| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Ms. Karol A. Kennedy | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | |
| Mr. Allen L. Raub | Member |
2. The applicant requests that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and any other awards that he is entitled to receive.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he was never awarded the AGCM, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM) with appropriate service stars or the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in Brooklyn, New York on 2 June 1965, for a period of 3 years. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 23 November 1965. He was assigned to Company D, 1st Battalion, 12th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division as an infantry direct fire crewman. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 20 September 1966.
5. He departed Vietnam on 11 November 1966 and was transferred to Fort Bragg, North Carolina. He was promoted to the rank of sergeant on 22 June 1967 and on 3 October 1967, while assigned to the 3rd Battalion, 503rd Infantry Battalion, 173rd Airborne Brigade, he was transferred back to Vietnam with his unit.
6. He remained in Vietnam until 20 May 1968, when he was transferred to Fort Lewis, Washington, where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) as an early overseas returnee, due to the expiration of his term of service. He had served 2 years, 11 months and 19 days of total active service and was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Parachutist Badge, the Purple Heart, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) first oak leaf cluster with “V” device, the Air Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal. He participated in five campaigns while assigned to Vietnam. His records also show that he had excellent conduct and efficiency ratings and there is no indication of disciplinary actions being taken against him.
7. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, prescribed Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning award of the AGCM. It states, in pertinent part, that the AGCM was established by Executive Order 8809, 28 June 1941 and was amended by Executive Order 9323, 1943 and by Executive Order 10444, 10 April 1953 and is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years, but more than 1 year, qualifies for award of the AGCM. Disqualification for award of the AGCM requires specific action by the commander in writing, to disqualify a member and it must be referred to the individual for comment.
8. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/palm) Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation and the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) for service in Vietnam during the period the applicant was assigned.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM). The Government of Vietnam awarded this medal to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or service outside the geographic limits of the Republic of Vietnam that contributed direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and its Armed Forces. Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the RVNCM.
10. That regulation also provides that a bronze service star is authorized to be worn on the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for each campaign in which credit is awarded. A silver service star is authorized for participation in five campaigns and is worn in lieu of bronze service stars.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. Although awarded subsequent to the applicant’s REFRAD, the applicant was entitled to be awarded the PUC, the RVNGC w/Palm and RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citations. Additionally, he should have been awarded the RVNCM and a silver service star for wear on his already awarded VSM, to denote his participation in five campaigns. Accordingly, it should be done so at this time.
2. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 2 June 1965 through 20 May 1968. This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information, which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM, and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the award.
3. The Board found that the applicant not receiving the AGCM was likely the result of an administrative error as opposed to it being the result of a conscious disqualification by any of the unit commanders for which he served. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the AGCM at this time.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation, the PUC, the RVNCM with ‘60 Device, one silver service star for wear on his already awarded VSM and the AGCM for the period of 2 June 1965 through 20 May 1968.
BOARD VOTE:
__kak___ ___alr ___ __mm___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
____Karol A. Kennedy____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002066812 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/06/18 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 102 | 107.0056/AGCM |
| 2. 134 | 107.0088/RVNCM |
| 3. 140 | 107.0094/RVNGC |
| 4. 141 | 107.0095/RVNCAHM |
| 5. 77 | 107.0031/PUC |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090343C070212
On 6 November 1963, he transferred to Vietnam with his unit. While in Vietnam, his commander submitted a recommendation to award the applicant the award of the Silver Star for gallantry in action in Vietnam on 2 and 3 March 1964. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded the BSM with "V" Device that was not included on his DD Form 214 at the time of separation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020485
The applicant requests that his deceased father be awarded two Silver Stars and two additional awards of the Bronze Star Medal; however, there are no orders or other evidence in his Official Military Personnel File authorizing these awards. Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that during his service with the Heavy Mortar Company of the 180th Infantry Regiment in Korea, this unit was awarded the Distinguished Unit...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013439
His DD Form 214, item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), lists the following earned awards: * NDSM * RVNCM with Device * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * ARCOM 8. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 30 November 1965 through 13 November 1967, and to add this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003459C070206
The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the GCMDL. The applicant has failed to show through evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record, sufficient evidence to establish his entitlement to the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080933C070215
He further states that his commander recommended him for the Silver Star and he should have also received the Purple Heart for his wounds. Army Regulation 15-185, the regulation under which this Board operates, states that the Board will not consider any application if it determines that the applicant has not exhausted all administrative remedies available to them. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023206
Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicants DA Form 20 shows he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * RVNCM with Device 1960 * AM * Bronze Star Medal (BSM) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) 6. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM first award for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 11 May 1967 through 8 May 1970 and to add this award to his DD Form...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018250
The applicant states that he was awarded all of those awards and they were omitted from his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM. Adding the following awards to his DD Form 214: * BSM with 1OLC and V Device * ARCOM with 1OLC...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077114C070215
The Soldier’s Medal is awarded to any person of the Armed Forces of the United States or of a friendly foreign nation who, while serving in any capacity with the Army of the United states, distinguished himself or herself by heroism not involving actual conflict with the enemy. The evidence of record fails to show that the applicant was wounded/injured as a result of enemy action. Additionally, there is no evidence that the applicant was recommended for an award of the Soldier’s Medal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004435C070206
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 29 June 1966 through 10 May 1968. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him four bronze service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012755
The applicants DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 7 January 1968 through 2 January 1969. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the DA Form 20 does not list the ARCOM and indicates the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) was requested. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 31 July 1967...