IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 09 March 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100008793
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE:
12. On 22 February 2010, new information was received from LTC L------ S.
C---------, Personnel Policy Integrator, Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 in regard to the decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20080001962, dated 17 June 2008.
13. The evidence submitted consists of an email from LTC C---------, dated 22 February 2010.
ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
4. At the time of the decision of the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20080001962, dated 17 June 2008, it was the intent of the ABCMR to make the applicants record as administratively correct as it should properly have been at the time.
5. The ABCMR's decision in Docket Number AR20080001962 failed to indicate the corrections that would be made to the applicants records if she is selected for promotion to colonel (COL) by a duly constituted Special Selection Board (SSB) under the 1998, 1999, and 2000 criteria.
6. The BOARD RECOMMENDATION should have included guidance that if the applicant was selected for promotion her records should be further corrected by promoting her to COL and assigning the appropriate date of rank with appropriate back pay and allowances and also that if she is not selected for promotion, she be notified accordingly.
BOARD VOTE:
__X_____ ___X____ ___X___ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
3. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant amendment of the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20080001962, dated 17 June 2008, to add in paragraph 1 of the BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
a. That if she is selected for promotion her records be further corrected by promoting her to COL, assigning the appropriate date of rank, and paid any associated back pay and allowances; and
b. That if she is not selected for promotion, she be notified accordingly.
___________X______________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100008793
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Supplemental Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100008793
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016411
The ABCMR's 17 June 2008 recommendation additionally should have read, "That if she is selected promote her to COL if otherwise eligible ." If the applicant is selected for promotion under the 2000 criteria, whose release date (and, therefore, the earliest date her promotion could be effective) was 4 January 2001, her records would need to be corrected to show she received a further 6-month extension to her MRD in order for her to be eligible to retire as a colonel. The Board determined...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030440
If the report of a special selection board, approved by the President, recommends for promotion to the next higher grade an officer not currently eligible for promotion, or a former officer whose name was referred to it, the Secretary of the Army may act through the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to correct the military record of the officer or former officer to correct an error or remove an injustice resulting from not being selected for promotion by the board which...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008160
All were so assigned except one officer the applicant. On 28 August 2010, by letter, the Director of Officer Personnel Management notified the applicant that she was considered for promotion to LTC by the FY 2010 LTC JAG Corps Promotion Selection Board but she was not selected for promotion. Counsel asserts that the applicants assignment to the Environmental Law Attorney position at FORSCOM was an off "due-course" assignment.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009418
The applicant provides: * Promotion consideration memorandum, dated 2 November 2004 * HRC Officer Promotion Memorandum, dated 19 April 2012 * Second Non-selection Memorandum, dated 12 April 1999 * Reassignment to the Retired Reserve orders, dated 21 May 1999 * Election of Option statement, dated 1 June 1999 * Extract of Army Regulation (AR) 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records) * Extract of AR 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021448
The applicant requests removal of the general officer memorandum of reprimand (GOMOR) from her official military personnel file (OMPF) or transfer of the GOMOR from the performance section to the restricted section of her OMPF. The applicant states that continued filing of the GOMOR in the performance section of her OMPF is unjust. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the GOMOR, dated 24 August...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012932
On 14 July 2009, the Active Component lieutenant colonel (LTC) promotion selection board results were released, and the applicant was selected for promotion to LTC. The RECOMMENDATION in Docket Number AR20090012774 should be amended to reflect the date of her "new" discharge from the Regular Army (i.e., 26 July 2009); to show she was placed on the appropriate Reserve promotion list, and to delete references to an SSB. BOARD VOTE: ___X____ ___X____ ____X__ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015716
An officer selected for promotion under the stipulation who had a promotion eligibility date (PED) prior to the approval date of the board criteria for which he/she was selected was granted the approval date of the board as his/her DOR. The evidence of record shows the applicant was selected for promotion to LTC by the August 2004 SSB under the 2003 criteria. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021243
Army Regulation 600-8-29, paragraph 5-5 states that an officer may decline certain promotions and that the officer should be counseled by his or her rater about the impact of declination. The IG indicated the applicant's promotion list was approved on 30 December 2009 and the PDA selection board did not meet until after 6 January 2010. Further, based on the statement in Enclosure 1 of the MOI and on COL KLC's response to the applicant, evidence shows the OPMD Director intended that the DCP...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005102
As he was serving as a CW2 in the NYARNG when he was notified of his promotion to LTC, when the board considered him for promotion to COL he did not have any Officer Evaluation Reports (OER) as a LTC in his records. He was recalled to active duty from a retired status and served on active duty in the rank of LTC as follows: * 16 November 2008 - 1 April 2009 * 28 June 2009 - 27 June 2010 * 1 August 2010 - 31 July 2011 13. Given that he was not selected for promotion to COL by three...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013319
He states: * he was not notified he was selected to appear before the FY 2009 LTC - COL APL DA Board * the RCS-AG-601 (Reserve Officers Eligible for Promotion) roster did not list him as a selectee for board consideration * a Military Personnel (MILPER) message accompanied the RCS-AG-601 stating no new LTCs/pay grade O-5 would be considered by the FY 2009 LTC - COL APL DA Board for promotion to COL/pay grade O-6 * the National Guard Bureau (NGB) cannot show that the supplemental RCS-AG-601...