Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008574
Original file (20100008574.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 August 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100008574 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 March 1994 to show the correct:

* rank and pay grade
* last unit of assignment
* specialty

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the above changes should be made to his
DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214; U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) Orders S143-5, dated 28 July 1993; and Headquarters, XVIII Airborne Corps and Fort Bragg Orders 314-137, dated 10 November 1993.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant had prior enlisted service.  On 13 April 1979, he was appointed as a Reserve Commissioned Officer Army in the rank of second lieutenant (2LT). He was assigned in Branch 11, Infantry (IN), and area of concentration (AOC) 11A.

3.  Headquarters, U.S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center Permanent Orders 87-7, dated 10 May 1984, show the applicant was awarded the Special Forces (SF) Tab and AOC 18A, in Branch 18, SF.  On or about this time, AOC 18A was awarded as his secondary AOC.

4.  A DA Form 1059-1 (Civilian Institution Academic Evaluation Report) for the period ending 26 March 1987 shows the applicant's basic Branch as 11 and secondary Branch as 18.

5.  A DA Form 67-8 (Officer Evaluation Report) for the period 27 March 1987 through 26 March 1988 shows the applicant's primary AOC during this period was 18A.

6.  There are no orders in the applicant's available records that show he was awarded Functional Area 39, Psychological Operations and Civil Affairs; however, a DA Form 67-8 for the rating period 3 July 1992 through 2 July 1993 shows his primary AOC during this rating period was 39B (Psychological Operations).

7.  PERSCOM Orders 7-014, dated 12 January 1991, show the applicant was promoted to the rank/pay grade of major (MAJ)/04 effective 1 February 1991.

8.  PERSCOM Orders S143-5, dated 28 July 1993, show the applicant was assigned to A Company, 8th Psychological Operations (PSYOP) Battalion, Fort Bragg, North Carolina and that he was retiring effective 31 March 1994 in the rank of MAJ.

9.  On 31 March 1994, the applicant retired.

10.  The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 March 1994 shows the following:

* item 4a (Grade, Rate, Rank) "SFC"
* item 4b (Pay Grade) "E07"
* item 7a (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) "A CO ATH [sic] PSYOP FT BRAGG, NC 28307 FORSCOM, FC"
* item 11 (Primary Specialty) "39B AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT OPERATOR/MAINTAINER - - 2 YRS- 0 MOS// NOTHING FOLLOWS"
* item 18 continued from item "18A SPECIAL FORCES" 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 March 1994 should be corrected to show the correct:

* rank and pay grade
* last unit of assignment
* specialty

2.  The available evidence shows the applicant was initially appointed as 2LT in AOC 11A and he retired on 31 March 1994 in the rank and grade of MAJ/O4. His last unit of assignment and major command prior to retiring was Company A, 8th PSYOP Battalion, Fort Bragg, North Carolina.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his rank and pay grade as MAJ/O4 and his last duty assignment as Company A, 8th PSYOP Battalion.

3.  Although there are no orders in the applicant's available records that show he was awarded AOCs 18A and 39B, during the course of his career as a commissioned officer, he served in the following AOCs:

* 11A Infantry - 7 years and 11 months
* 18A SF - 5 years and 3 months
* 39B Psychological Operations - 1 year and 8 months

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the above AOCs.

BOARD VOTE:

____x____  ____x____  _____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____ ____  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: 

   a.  deleting from item 4a of his DD Form 214 SFC;
   
   b.  adding to item 4a of his DD Form 214 MAJ;

   c.  deleting from item 4b of his DD Form 214 E07;
   
   d.  adding to item 4b of his DD Form 214 O4;
   
   e.  deleting from item 8a of his DD Form 214 A CO ATH PSYOP FT BRAGG, NC 28307 FORSCOM, FC;
   
   f.  adding to item 8a of his DD Form 214 A CO, 8TH PSYOP, FT BRAGG, NC 28307 FORSCOM, FC;
   
	g.  deleting from item 11 as continued in item 18 of his DD Form 214 39B AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT OPERATOR/MAINTAINER - - 2 YRS- 0 MOS and 18A SPECIAL FORCES; and 
   
   h.  adding to item 11 of his DD Form 214:
   
* 11A Infantry - 7 years and 11 months
* 18A Special Forces - 5 years and 3 months
* 39B Psychological Operations - 1 year and 8 months




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100008574



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100008574



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018235

    Original file (20120018235.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Order Number 294-035 issued by the U.S. Total Army Personnel Command, on 20 October 2004, announced his promotion to MAJ with an effective date and date of rank of 1 November 2004. The regulation states items 4a, 4b, and 12h would list the rank, grade, and the date of rank of the individual's promotion or reduction to the rank/grade in which the individual was serving on the effective date of release, separation, or discharge from active duty. The evidence of record shows that in September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011577C070208

    Original file (20040011577C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The available evidence shows the applicant was promoted to 1LT on 7 August 1989, to CPT on 14 July 1993, and to MAJ on 12 November 2004. The opinion stated the applicant's DOR to MAJ should be adjusted to 13 July 2000 and, based on that adjustment, his records should be forwarded to a Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion consideration to LTC under the criteria in effect in 2004. The State MILPO could have granted an interim TOP SECRET clearance which would have permitted the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068045C070402

    Original file (2002068045C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his request for branch transfer into the Special Forces Branch (SFB) in specialty 18A be approved. In addition to completion of the qualification course, this regulation indicates that the ASI 5G and the SF Tab must be awarded by competent authority, which was the case for him. The Board notes the applicant’s contention his request for branch transfer into the SFB should be approved based on his being qualified, as evidenced by his being awarded the SF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012288

    Original file (20080012288.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 October 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080012288 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that items 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank), 4b (Pay Grade), and 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 25 August 2008 be corrected to show he was promoted to major/pay grade O4 effective 30 May 2008. The applicant states that he was promoted to major...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000391

    Original file (20140000391.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * U.S. Army Military Personnel Center Orders S144-4, dated 27 July 1981 * his DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. His DD Form 214 with an effective date of 30 November 1981 shows his rank as SFC and his pay grade as E-7. This regulation states that the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation will be entered in Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) of the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001926

    Original file (20140001926.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends that his DD Form 214, DFAS records, and TRICARE/medical records were not corrected to show he was promoted to MAJ because he was promoted just prior to his retirement. While orders were published showing he was promoted to MAJ effective 1 August 2012, the law states that to retire in the grade of MAJ he would have had to serve six months in that grade. While it is appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show his rank as MAJ, his DFAS and TRICARE/medical records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010095

    Original file (20100010095.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was a paratrooper with the 1st Battalion, 325th Infantry, 82nd Airborne Division, Fort Bragg, NC; that he volunteered for service in Vietnam; and all of his authorized awards and decorations. (1) Special orders awarded the applicant MOS 36K2P and it is recorded in item 23a of his DD Form 214. (2) However, item 25 of his DD Form 214 does not show the training...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013648

    Original file (20130013648.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of items 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 26 April 2012 to show his rank/pay grade as master sergeant (MSG)/E-8. The applicant provides amended orders, dated 4 April 2012. The evidence of record shows the applicant held the rank/pay grade of SFC/E-7 at the time of his retirement on 26 April 2012.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001933

    Original file (20130001933.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to: * correct the period he served in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) * change his branch of service * correct the misspelling of Colombia 2. Evidence of record shows the applicant served in support of Operation Enduring Freedom in Bogota, Colombia from 12 January 2003 to 30 September 2006. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show service in support of OEF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018573

    Original file (20140018573.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    If the Soldier does not meet all the criteria follow instructions in Section 3 for requesting an exception to policy (ETP)" (1) Section 1 (OAB Eligibility Requirements) shows the applicant('s): * AOC was on the SRIP list effective at the time of application * OAB Written agreement was signed by Soldier, Service Representative, and witnessing Officer on the same day * Direct Commissions would complete the bonus agreement prior to the dated of the DA Form 71(Oath of Office – Military...