Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008445
Original file (20100008445.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  10 August 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100008445 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he does not see any reason why he should not receive the AGCM along with the accompanying medal set.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant’s records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 25 February 1964 for a period of 2 years.  Upon completion of basic combat and advanced individual training, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 05C (Radio Telephone Operator).  He was honorably released from active duty on 19 February 1966 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  He served 1 year, 11 months, and 25 days of total active service with 5 months and 3 days of foreign service in USARPAC [Vietnam].

3.  Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not show award of the AGCM.

4.  There is no indication in the applicant’s personnel records that he was recommended for or awarded the AGCM.  A copy of his DA Form 24 (Service Record), section 2 (Chronological Record of Military Service), shows he received four "excellent," one "good," and two "unknown" conduct and efficiency rating periods during his active service.

5.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  Ratings of "Unknown" for portions of the period under consideration were not disqualifying.  Service school efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "Good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 were not disqualifying.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his records to show award of the AGCM was carefully considered and found not to be supported by the evidence.

2.  The applicant's records show he did not receive all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings during the qualifying period for award of the AGCM.  The regulatory guidance in effect at the time stated the enlisted person must have 


had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  The applicant did not have all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  Therefore, based on the foregoing, he is not entitled to the AGCM.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ___X____  ___X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  Notwithstanding the staff DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS above, the Board determined that the applicant's service was "excellent" while he was in a permanent party status.  He received "good" conduct and efficiency ratings only while in basic combat training.  The Board believed those "good" ratings should not prevent him from being awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  Therefore, the Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to grant relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 25 February 1964 through 19 February 1966; and

	b.  adding the Army Good Conduct Medal to his DD Form 214.



      _________XXX__________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100008445



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100008445



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019837

    Original file (20100019837.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974. It would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM based on completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016908

    Original file (20140016908.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There are no orders or any other evidence showing he was awarded or recommended for the AGCM. His military service qualifies him for award of the NDSM; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021667

    Original file (20140021667.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on his overall record of service, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 23 April 1962 through 22 April 1964 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. The applicant’s USMC records are not available for review; however, the applicable regulation, in effect at the time, made no provision to list awards receive outside the period covered by the DD Form 214. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006163

    Original file (20110006163.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He provides the following: * Two DD Forms 214 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) * DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record – Armed Forces of the United States) * DA Form 24 (Service Record) * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * DA Forms 2627-1 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) * Special Orders Number 64, dated 19 December 1966 * General Orders...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025382

    Original file (20100025382.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 December 1963. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 6 December 1963 to 7 September 1966 and adding it to his DD Form 214. _____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021057

    Original file (20140021057.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he received the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal (VCM) and any other awards he may have earned. Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the: * Republic of Korea from 17 July 1964 to 28 July 1965 * RVN from 20 October 1966 through 9 February 1967 4. c. Adding to his DD Form 214 the: * AGCM (1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002863

    Original file (20140002863.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded or authorized the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960). His military records contain Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam, General Orders Number 3608, dated 10 June 1966, awarding him the ARCOM for meritorious service in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006095

    Original file (20140006095.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. There is no evidence of record and he failed to provide evidence showing the PUC was awarded to any of the units to which he was assigned. The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001135

    Original file (20150001135.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the: * Army Good Conduct Medal * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with two bronze service stars * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960 (RVNCM) 2. The applicant provides: * Self-Authored Statement * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) letter with original Record of Proceedings * DA Form 20 (Enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028949

    Original file (20100028949.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The record does not show he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (1st Award) based on completion of a qualifying period of active Federal service and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 2 January 1964 to 12 January 1966; b. deleting the VSM from...