IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 29 April 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100007009
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests removal of a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), signed on 20 October 2009 and filed in her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) on 25 November 2009.
2. The applicant states she submitted the first copy of the DA Form 1059 after her graduation from the course. She states the school later contacted her indicating minor corrections had to be made to the form and she was required to sign a second form (digital signature used). The corrected copy was then submitted to her OMPF.
3. The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of her application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is a staff sergeant currently serving on active duty.
2. A DA Form 1059, signed on 20 October 2009, shows the applicant attended the SLC (Senior Leader Course) (42A) 020-09 from 14 September 2009 through 20 October 2009. This form contains hand-written signatures and was filed in her OMPF on 25 November 2009.
3. A DA Form 1059, digitally signed on 23 November 2009, shows the applicant attended the SLC (42A) 904-09 from 14 September 2009 through 20 October 2009. This form was filed in her OMPF on 29 December 2009
4. Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records), provides in Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) that DA Forms 1059 are filed in the Performance Section of the OMPF. This regulation also provides that once filed, such documents become a permanent part of the OMPF and may only be removed by one of several agencies, one of which is the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR).
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends the DA Form 1059 signed on 20 October 2009 should be removed from her OMPF.
2. The only difference between the two DA Forms 1059 is the course number. Apparently due to an administrative error the incorrect course number was entered on the DA Form 1059, signed on 20 October 2009. Therefore, a corrected DA Form 1059, digitally signed on 23 November 2009, was filed in the applicant's OMPF on 29 December 2009.
3. The DA Form 1059, signed on 20 October 2009, contains an administrative error by the school. This form holds no historical value in documenting the applicant's military career. Therefore, it would be appropriate to remove this form from the applicant's OMPF.
BOARD VOTE:
___X____ ___X____ ____X___ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing the DA Form 1059, signed on 20 October 2009, from the applicant's OMPF.
__________X__________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100007009
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100007009
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018903
A comment on the form states she met academic requirements but failed to meet body fat composition standards during the course in accordance with Army Regulation 600-9 (The Army Weight Control Program). The available records do not include a DA Form 5501 documenting the measurements that served as the basis for determining she did not meet height/weight standards while attending the SLC. Other than her own statements, there is no evidence of error in the determination that she did not meet...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007483
The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 19 January 2007, from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Accordingly, as required by the applicable regulation at the time, she was issued a DA Form 1059 that shows she marginally achieved course standards in that she met the academic requirements but failed to meet body fat standards IAW AR 600-9 during this course. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000910
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant contends that the DA Form 1059, dated 13 February 2007, should be removed from his OMPF. In this regard, the OMPF serves to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, duty performance, and evaluation periods and any corrections to other parts of the OMPF.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004398
The applicant requests the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) for the period ending 31 May 2012, currently filed in her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) be removed. In accordance with the applicable regulation, the performance folder should show a continuous record of a Soldier's performance throughout his/her Army service. Therefore, her DA Form 1059 is correctly filed and should not be removed or transferred to the restricted folder of her OMPF.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150009127
The applicant requests correction of her DA Form 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER)) for the rating period 31 August 2012 through 5 July 2013, specifically to recreate the NCOER with the proper rating chain and change her duty position to Platoon Sergeant. The applicant's available records do not contain evidence that shows she requested a Commander's Inquiry (CI) regarding the contested NCOER. The applicant provides: a.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005707
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests the following documents be removed from her official military personnel file (OMPF): * DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 14 July 2005 * duplicate Army Good Conduct Medal orders, dated 17 September 2004, filed under two categories in the performance section of her OMPF 2. The applicant requests an Academic Evaluation Report showing she failed to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029346
The applicant states: * the correct DA Form 1059 for this course shows she attended the course during the period 13 February 2006 through 14 March 2006 * the error was caused due to a lack of attention to detail by her small group leader * she wants to correct her records because she is coming up for her first consideration by the sergeant first class promotion board 3. Since the duration of WLC is 4 weeks for Regular Army Soldiers and evidence shows she attended WLC during the period 13...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024415
The applicant requests removal of a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) for the period 11 October 2006 through 14 December 2006 from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). c. she has completed the requirement of the Captain's Career Course and this DA Form 1059 has affected her promotion to major. The applicant provides: * The DA Form 1059 in question * Five OERs * A DA Form 1059 for the period 29 November 2010 through 10 December 2010 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024423
The applicant requests the removal of his General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR) and all allied documents from his official military personnel file (OMPF) or as an alternative he requests that the GOMOR be transferred to the restricted section of his OMPF. The GOMOR was filed in the performance section of his OMPF. The applicant's documents related to this matter are filed as follows: * his GOMOR, consisting of a 9-page packet of documents, is filed in the performance section of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009267
The applicant states that: a. she has two DA forms 1059 showing she completed Phase I of BNCOC; b. she has completed the Warrior Leadership Course in 2006 and would like to have the DA Form 1059 for PLDC removed; c. she was awarded a certificate of achievement that is showing the wrong year; and d. she only needs one DD Form 214 in her OMPF. The applicant's records also show that she was released from active duty on 23 October 1999 in accordance with chapter 4 of Army Regulation 635-200...