IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 12 August 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100000910
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests his DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 13 February 2007, be removed from his official military personnel file (OMPF).
2. The applicant states he had personal concerns and had to be removed from the Advanced Noncommissioned Officer Course (ANCOC). He successfully completed the ANCOC/Senior Leader Course (SLC) on 8 October 2009 and would like to have this DA Form 1059 replace the DA Form 1059, dated 13 February 2007. He feels he has been twice passed over for promotion due to this negative document.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DA Form 1059, dated 8 October 2009, in support of his request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is a Regular Army staff sergeant (SSG) who initially enlisted on 28 May 1999. His records show that he holds military occupational specialty 88M (Motor Transport Operator) and that he was promoted through the ranks to SSG on 1 December 2005.
2. The applicant's records show he was enrolled in the Transportation Deployment and Distribution ANCOC at the NCO Academy, Fort Eustis, VA, from 23 January 2007 to 23 February 2007 and was disenrolled for inappropriate personal conduct. The DA Form 1059 he was issued shows he "failed to achieve course standards." This form is filed in the performance section of his OMPF.
3. The applicant's records further show he was reenrolled in the Transportation Deployment Distribution SLC, Phase I, at the NCO Academy, Fort Eustis, VA, from 10 September 2009 to 8 October 2009. The DA Form 1059 he was issued shows he achieved course standards. This form is also filed in the performance section of his OMPF.
4. Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/
Records) provides the principles of support, standards of service, policies, tasks, rules, and steps governing all work required to support maintaining the OMPF. Chapter 2 provides detailed guidance and instructions with regard to the initiation, composition, maintenance, changing, access to, and transfer of the OMPF. Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) shows that the DA Form 1059 is filed in the performance section of the OMPF.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends that the DA Form 1059, dated 13 February 2007, should be removed from his OMPF.
2. The evidence of record shows the applicant failed to achieve course standards for ANCOC from 23 January 2007 to 23 February 2007. His DA Form 1059 shows his personal conduct was such that continuance in the course was not appropriate. His subsequent successful completion the course of instruction does not warrant the removal of the initial DA Form 1059 because there is no error or injustice. This DA Form 1059 is correctly filed in the performance section of his OMPF.
3. The purpose of maintaining the OMPF is to protect the interests of both the U.S. Army and the Soldier. In this regard, the OMPF serves to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, duty performance, and evaluation periods and any corrections to other parts of the OMPF. Once placed in the OMPF, the document becomes a permanent part of that file and will not be removed from or moved to another part of the OMPF unless directed by an appropriate authority.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X___ ____X___ ____X___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_____________X____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100000910
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100000910
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016547
U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Eustis, Military Personnel Division, Fort Eustis issued the following orders: * Orders 149-0011, dated 29 May 2009 - placed him on the Retired List by reason of permanent disability effective 28 July 2009. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be amended to show he was an SFC, pay grade E-7 with an effective date of grade of 27 July 2009. Showing he was promoted to SFC/pay grade E-7 effective 27 July 2009. b. Amending his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 27 July...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008272
Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) of this Army regulation shows that the DA Form 1059 is filed on the performance section of the OMPF. The evidence of record shows that the applicant failed to achieve course standards for Phase II of 19D BNCOC from 22 May 2008 to 2 July 2008. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007009
This regulation also provides that once filed, such documents become a permanent part of the OMPF and may only be removed by one of several agencies, one of which is the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The applicant contends the DA Form 1059 signed on 20 October 2009 should be removed from her OMPF. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing the DA Form 1059, signed on 20 October...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007483
The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 19 January 2007, from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Accordingly, as required by the applicable regulation at the time, she was issued a DA Form 1059 that shows she marginally achieved course standards in that she met the academic requirements but failed to meet body fat standards IAW AR 600-9 during this course. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008630
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests removal/deletion of an Article 15 from the restricted folder of his official military personnel file (OMPF). Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) of Army Regulation 600-8-104 shows that the DA Form 2627 is filed in either the performance or restricted section of the OMPF, as directed in Item 5 of the DA Form 2627.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015921
The applicant requests, in effect, amendment of the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report (AER)), dated 18 August 2006, that is filed in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The rater documented the applicant's academic performance average for ANCOC of 95.8% and that he passed the APFT on 6 August 2006 in item 14 of the DA Form 1059. The rater also provided comments in item 14 of the DA Form 1059 about the applicant's leadership capabilities and overall...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009267
The applicant states that: a. she has two DA forms 1059 showing she completed Phase I of BNCOC; b. she has completed the Warrior Leadership Course in 2006 and would like to have the DA Form 1059 for PLDC removed; c. she was awarded a certificate of achievement that is showing the wrong year; and d. she only needs one DD Form 214 in her OMPF. The applicant's records also show that she was released from active duty on 23 October 1999 in accordance with chapter 4 of Army Regulation 635-200...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006515
The applicant provides two DA Forms 1059, dated 8 September 2007. Therefore, it would be appropriate to remove the DA Form 1059, dated 8 September 2007, which shows an X in item 11b from his OMPF. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing the DA Form 1059, dated 8 September 2007, which shows an X in item 11b from his OMPF.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005918
The applicant requests that the DA Form 1059 (Academic Evaluation Report (AER)) dated 30 March 2007 be removed from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File, and replaced with the corrected copy of the same form. The applicant states the DA Form 1059 currently contained in his interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) for the period ending on 30 March 2007 contains a marginal rating; however, a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009648C070205
In his application to the Board, the applicant based his request for removal of the DA Form 1059, dated 25 September 2003, on the fact he returned to the AMEDD NCO Academy and successfully completed ANCOC and met the Army standard. The document will not be removed from a fiche or moved to another part of the fiche unless directed by, among other agencies, the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) or the OMPF custodian when documents have been improperly filed. The...