Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000793
Original file (20100000793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  24 June 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100000793 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending on 29 February 2008 to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 68W (Health Care Specialist).

2.  The applicant states he completed all the training required to receive this MOS.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of Orders 11-239, dated 11 January 2008, and a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 29 February 2008.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 9 May 2006.  He subsequently entered active duty (ADT) for training on 20 July 2006.  However, he was discharged on 22 December 2006 under the provisions of chapter 11 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations). 

3.  Item 11 (Primary Specialty) of his DD Form 214 for the period ending on 22 December 2006 shows the entry "None" indicating he was not awarded an MOS

4.  He then enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 4 years on 23 August 2007 and he was assigned to Fort Sam Houston, TX, for training in MOS 68W.

5.  The facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge are not available for review with this case.  However, he provided a copy of a DD Form 214 that shows he was discharged on 29 February 2008 under the provisions of paragraph 5-11 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of failing medical, physical, or procurement standards.  

6.  Items 11 and 14 (Military Education) of this DD Form 214 also show the entry "None." 

7.  He submitted a copy of Orders 11-239, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Medical Department and School, Fort Sam Houston, TX, on 11 January 2008, awarding him MOS 68W effective 18 January 2008.

8.  Per phone conversation on 10 June 2010 between the case analyst of record and the Noncommissioned Officer in Charge (NCOIC), Academic Standards, 68W Course, Fort Sam Houston, TX, the NCOIC indicated that the applicant did not graduate from the 68W course.  The NCOIC also stated that due to the large number of students, MOS orders are normally prepared in advance prior to graduation.  

9.  On 15 June 2010, Headquarters, U.S. Army Medical Department and School, Fort Sam Houston, TX, published Orders 166-205 revoking the applicant's MOS orders. 

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of their military service.  It is important that information entered on the form should be complete and accurate.  Item 11 of the DD Form 214 reflects the primary specialty.  This Item contains titles of all MOS served for at least 1 year and includes for each MOS the number of years and months served.  Item 14 shows the Soldier’s Military Education, formal in-service (full-time attendance) training courses successfully completed during the period of service covered by the DD Form 214.  This item includes title, length in weeks, and year completed.  This information is to assist the Soldier in job placement and counseling; therefore, do not list training courses for combat skills.

11.  The Transition Policy Office at the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (the proponent of Army Regulation 635-5) previously advised that for Regular Army enlisted Soldiers, item 11 of the DD Form 214 shows the MOS that was awarded, either by service school attendance or orders awarding the MOS. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record shows the applicant attended training for MOS 68W but he did not complete training.  He was processed out for medical reasons.  It appears that the orders awarding him MOS 68W were pre-prepared ahead of graduation and should not have been published and were recently revoked.  Therefore, he is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000793



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR201000007

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001775

    Original file (20110001775.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The same regulation states to list in-service (full-time attendance) training courses successfully completed during the period of service in item 14 of the DD Form 214. Her request to have MOS 91C added to item 11 and the Practical Nurse Course to item 14 of her DD Form 214 was carefully considered. Both conversion periods were prior to the applicant’s retirement from the Army and accordingly, her MOS was converted during each period.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013357

    Original file (20140013357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show completion of the Practical Nurse Course. Acceptable source documents include the enlisted record brief, DA Form 4037 (Officer Record Brief), DA Form 1059, or other military issued certificate of completion with from and through dates or number of weeks. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002085

    Original file (20130002085.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests cancellation of the recoupment action that requires him to repay his $20,000 Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) for Critical Skill military occupational specialty (MOS) 68W (Health Care Specialist) in the Idaho Army National Guard (IDARNG) and that he be allowed to retain the bonus as an exception to policy (ETP). He stated the applicant contracted for a $20,000 NPS Critical Skill Enlistment Bonus as a 68W on 4 August 2008. He stated the applicant contracted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015660

    Original file (20070015660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 11 (Primary Specialty) and Item 14 (Military Education) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge) be corrected. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, AARTS transcript, Certificate of Affiliation with the Army Medical Department Regiment, Certificate of Completion for the Emergency Medical Technician-Basic Course, Certificate of Completion for the Health Care Specialist Course, and another DD form 214 from the U.S. Navy...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018070

    Original file (20080018070.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel states that the applicant timely completed the APFT on 4 December 1999. It is noted that, during the applicant's counseling session with the AMEDD OBC Program Director, he was advised that upon submission of a true copy of the record to the AMEDD Center and School showing a passing score on the APFT, his academic record would be revised to reflect his successful completion of the AMEDD OBC. Additionally, the applicant did not submit a verified copy of the DA Form 705 to the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016067

    Original file (AR20070016067.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: Application Receipt Date: 2007/11/08 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 061122 Chapter: 5-11 AR: 635-200 Reason: Failed Medical/Physical/Procurement Standards RE: SPD: JFW Unit/Location: B Co, 232d Medical Training Bn, Fort Sam Houston, TX Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NOne Counseling Records Available: Yes...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015058

    Original file (20090015058.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He adds he was removed from his duty station and transferred to a battery that was far away only one day after he got married. At the time he had completed 2 years of net active service. Item 38 of his DA Form 20 shows his duty MOS was 710 and his principal duty assignment was "Clerk AIT" at the USAMTC, Fort Sam Houston.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005917

    Original file (20090005917.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states, in pertinent part, that item 14 (Military Education) will list formal in-service training courses of 40 hours or more successfully completed during the period of service covered by title, length in weeks, and month and year completed. Although the evidence of record shows he was awarded PMOS 91A, there are no orders which show he was awarded the Expert Field Medical Badge and the applicant has not provided any supporting evidence to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004321

    Original file (20130004321.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A DD Form 214 ending on 26 June 2009 reports the applicant: a. has a middle name of James; b. was ordered to active duty on 26 June 2008 in support of Operation Enduring Freedom; c. served in Afghanistan from 24 August 2008 to 28 May 2009; d. held MOS 68W; and e. does not show he was awarded the CMB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019577

    Original file (20130019577.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect: a. removal of a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 2 July 2012, from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF); and b. that his case be reviewed by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion to captain (CPT). e. he is requesting that a new Academic Evaluation Report be placed in iPERMS to show he successfully completed BOLC. It states a DA Form 1059 will be filed in the performance section of the OMPF 13.