IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 13 October 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110008413
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of items 6a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 6b (Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), for the period ending 18 February 1977, to show he was separated in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5, versus specialist four (SP4)/E-4.
2. The applicant states, "I was an E-4 at the time of my discharge."
3. The applicant provides:
* his DD Form 214, for the period ending 16 February 1971
* his DD Form 214, for the period ending 18 February 1977
* General Orders Number 52, Headquarters, 35th Engineer Group (Construction), dated 2 August 1969
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 June 1968. He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 51B (Carpenter).
3. Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record Part II) shows he was promoted to SP4 effective 18 July 1969.
4. On 18 February 1977, he was honorably discharged. Item 6a of his DD Form 214 shows his rank as SP4. Item 6b shows his grade as E-4.
5. On 19 February 1977, he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve, in the rank/grade of SP4/E-4. Item 49 (Prior Service) of his DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract Armed Forces of the United States) shows he was discharged from the Regular Army on 18 February 1977, in the rank/grade of SP4/E-4.
6. His available record is void of any document that shows he was promoted to SGT.
7. Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), in effect at the time, prescribed policies, responsibilities, and procedures pertaining to career management of Army enlisted personnel. Chapter 7 contained Army-wide promotion policy and procedures. Promotion of enlisted personnel to grade E-5 through E-9, appointments, grade reductions, and grade restoration were announced in routine orders.
8. Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations Separation Documents) established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214. The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service. It is important that information entered on the form should be complete and accurate. Items 6a and 6b show the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation and are obtained from the Soldier's records (promotion or reduction orders).
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he was a SGT at the time of his discharge. The evidence of record does not support this contention; therefore, he is not entitled to the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X____ ___X____ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X_____ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110006018
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110008413
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021202
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show he held the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/pay grade E-6 instead of specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4 at the time of release from active duty. His record contains no evidence and he has failed to provide evidence showing he was promoted to the rank of SSG/E-6 during the period of active duty service covered by his DD Form 214. Evidence shows the applicant was promoted to SSG/E-6 in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028667
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). * Item 6a shows "SP4" * Item 6b shows "E4" * Item 7 shows "76-03-05" * Item 17a shows "NA" * Item 17b shows "NA" * Item 26 shows "National Defense Service Medal" 6. The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002625
There are no orders in his record that shows he was ever promoted to SP5. Although he appeared before an E-5 promotion board and was recommended for promotion, there is no evidence in his record and he has not provided any evidence that shows he was ever promoted to SP5/E-5. The DD Form 214 he was issued correctly shows his rank/grade as SP4/E-4.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021349
The applicant states: * he was promoted in 1975 or 1976 as an acting noncommissioned officer (NCO) in the rank of SGT * his promotion was omitted from his DD Form 214 and kept out of his personnel records * he is eligible for the KDSM for his service in Korea during the period 1974-1975 3. The DD Form 214 he was issued does not show the KDSM as an authorized award. Since there is no evidence of record showing he was recommended for promotion to SGT by a promotion selection board and placed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000197
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), ending on 6 August 1977, to show his rank/grade as specialist four (SP4)/E-4 instead of private (PV2)/E-2. His rank and grade at the time of release from active duty was PV1/E-1. There is no evidence in his records and he did not provide any evidence that shows he was promoted beyond this rank/grade while on active duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001749
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was discharged in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 vice private (PV2)/E-2. It states items 6a and 6b will show the active duty rank and pay grade at the time of the Soldier's separation. There is no evidence in his records and he provides none that shows he was promoted beyond the rank/grade of PV2/E2 from the date he was reduced to the lowest enlisted grade to the date...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014488C071029
The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he completed 5 months and 6 days of active duty service during the period covered by the DD Form 214. The applicant's record does show he completed two food service courses in 1972 and 1976; however, it also shows that he was awarded MOS 11B in 1976, and that he was ordered to active duty in that MOS. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010925
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his highest level of education/training, award of the Army Commendation Medal, and that he was promoted to specialist five (SP5)/pay grade E-5. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020819
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show the following: * award of the * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * National Defense Service Medal * dates of his promotions to the grades of E-2 through E-5 * training completion of the * Basic Leadership Course * Primary Leadership Course * Aircraft Armament Mechanic Course * Aircraft Armament Mechanic Course (45M2O) * two correspondence courses 2. With respect to listing...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018200
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of item 4 (Date of Birth), items 6a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 6b (Pay Grade), and item 9d (Effective Date) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty). There is no evidence indicating the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for a change to the reason for his separation within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.