Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021816
Original file (20090021816.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 June 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090021816 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his subsequent service in the United States Army Reserve (USAR).

2.  The applicant states that he desires his DD Form 214 to be corrected to show the USAR service that he completed after he was released from active duty (REFRAD).

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 October 1979 for a period of 4 years.  He completed his training and served until he was honorably REFRAD on 10 October 1983 and was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his statutory service obligation.  

3.  On 16 July 1985, the applicant was transferred to Battery A, 3d Battalion, 15th Artillery Regiment in Cullman, Alabama.  On 18 August 1987, he was transferred back to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) due to unsatisfactory participation.  On 9 March 1988, he was honorably discharged from the USAR.

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of the
DD Form 214.  It provides, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect information as it exist on the date of release from active duty or discharge.  The DD Form 214 will not be corrected to reflect Events and/or information that occur subsequent to the date the DD Form 214 was prepared.  In other words, once the DD Form 214 is prepared and authenticated, no information or data that occurs after the date of release or discharge will be entered on that form.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2.  The applicant’s contention that his service in the USAR that occurred subsequent to his REFRAD should be entered on his DD Form 214 has been considered and found to lack merit.

3.  The DD Form 214 serves to document service up to the date an individual is REFRAD or discharged from active duty.  Service performed subsequent to the effective date of the DD Form 214 is not authorized for entry on the DD Form 214.

4.  Accordingly, there is no basis to grant the applicant’s request.







BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021816



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021816



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019562

    Original file (20140019562.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his rank as Sergeant (SGT) E-5. On 21 August 1984, he was transferred to Fort Stewart, Georgia where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) in the pay grade of E-4 on 4 October 1985. The applicant was subsequently discharged from the USAR in the rank of sergeant.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013039

    Original file (20140013039.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) dated 16 November 1994 be corrected to reflect his Federal deployment overseas for training. The DD Form 214 should reflect information that is in effect at the time the DD Form 214 is prepared. Further, regulatory guidance states a DD Form 214 is prepared for Reserve component personnel when they serve 90 or more days of continuous active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020113

    Original file (20130020113.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 June 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130020113 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his rank of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 as permanent. His rank of SGT became permanent on 4 October 1969, the day after his REFRAD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000665

    Original file (20110000665.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests issuance of an Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 4 January 1974, the date he completed his active duty service. At the time the applicant completed his active duty service obligation he was honorably REFRAD as shown on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 4 January 1974. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029431

    Original file (20100029431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She states she served 11 months and 8 days of active duty and then reenlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 19 December 1985 for six years. Her separation packet is not available for the Board’s review; however, her DD Form 214 shows she was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 12 December 1979, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel), chapter 8, for pregnancy. Orders D-12-135821, dated 18 December 1991, which are contained in her military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010458

    Original file (20120010458.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states the SSN recorded on his DD Form 214 is incorrect. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows in: a. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his correct SSN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009009

    Original file (20140009009.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant’s records failed to show any evidence of the applicant serving on active duty as a 2LT. The applicant was REFRAD in the pay grade of E-5 and his DD Form 214 correctly reflects the rank he served under while on active duty as of 7 March 1984. The applicant was commissioned as a USAR 2LT on 28 August 1984 and there is no evidence to show that he served on active duty in that grade long enough to be issued a DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023313

    Original file (20100023313.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) dated 30 September 1992 be corrected to reflect his award of the Armed Forces Reserve Medal (AFRM) with Silver Hourglass to reflect his 20 years of Reserve Component service. He goes on to state that he was transferred to the Retired Reserve effective 1 September 2001 and should now be authorized to wear the AFRM with silver hourglass. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002486

    Original file (20140002486.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (statutory or other directives), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005310

    Original file (20090005310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that item 19a (Mailing Address after Separation) and item 19b (Nearest Relative) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected. The address and nearest relative listed in items 19a and 19b of the applicant's DD Form 214 would have been provided by him at the time it was prepared and he authenticated the DD Form 214 with his...