Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000665
Original file (20110000665.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 July 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110000665 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests issuance of an Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 4 January 1974, the date he completed his active duty service.

2.  The applicant states that he received an Honorable Discharge Certificate for his inactive Reserve Service.  However, he never received his Honorable Discharge Certificate when he completed his active duty service.  He states it may at some point in the future be important for him to be able to produce this document for whatever reason and it should indicate the correct date.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 


has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) under the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 18 September 1970 for a period of 6 years.

3.  On 6 January 1971, he was discharged from the USAR DEP.  On 7 January 1971, he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years.  He completed his basic training at Fort Jackson, SC, his advanced individual training at Fort Sill, OK, and his airborne training at Fort Benning, GA before being transferred to Fort Bragg, NC for his first and only duty assignment.  He was promoted to the rank/grade of specialist five (SP5)/E-5 on 2 November 1972.

4.  On 4 January 1974, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) due to the expiration of his term of service (ETS).  He completed 2 years,
11 months, and 28 days of total active service.  His DD Form 214 for this period of service shows in:

* item 9e (Character of Service) the entry "Honorable"
* item 9f (Type of Certificate Issued) the entry "DNA"

5.  The applicant was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete the remainder of his Reserve obligation.  On 18 September 1975, he was transferred to the Standby Reserve.

6.  Orders 08-1164199, issued by the Office of The Adjutant General, Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center, St. Louis, MO, dated
24 August 1974, honorably discharged the applicant from the USAR Control Group (Standby Reserve), effective 17 September 1976

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), in effect at the time, serves as the authority for the separation of enlisted personnel and governs the issuance of discharge certificates.  It provides, in pertinent part, that discharge certificates are only issued upon discharge.  Individuals who are REFRAD are not entitled to a discharge certificate until all obligations are completed.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers 


upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states an entry is required for all items of the DD Form 214.  When the information is omitted or where no entry is appropriate, enter "DNA."  It further states for:

* item 9e, enter the character of service issued
* item 9f, enter the form number of discharge or retirement certificate, as appropriate

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions have been noted and appear to lack merit.  The applicable regulations provide that a DD Form 258A (Honorable Discharge Certificate) will be issued only upon discharge.

2.  At the time the applicant completed his active duty service obligation he was honorably REFRAD as shown on his DD Form 214 for the period ending
4 January 1974.  His DD Form 214 appropriately shows he was not issued a discharge certificate.  He was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his statutory service obligation.

3.  Accordingly, he was honorably discharged from the USAR on 17 September 1976 and he was properly issued a discharge certificate at that time.

4.  The applicant is advised that should the need arise, his DD Form 214 is the appropriate source document to present showing he was honorably REFRAD from his period of active service from 7 January 1971 through 4 January 1974.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110000665



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110000665



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008414

    Original file (20090008414.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be corrected to show his characterization of service. Based on the evidence of record and the regulatory guidance, in effect at the time of the applicant's relief from ADT, he is entitled to have his record corrected to show his period of active service from 24 June to 23 October 1975 as an honorable characterization. In addition, the applicant's separation document lacks the required entries to accurately...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005787

    Original file (20120005787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. On 10 April 1974, Office of the Adjutant General, USAR Components Personnel and Administration Center, St. Louis, MO, published Letter Orders Number 040378 transferring him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011425

    Original file (20090011425.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military personnel records do not contain any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded or received more than one award of the Army Commendation Medal. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows he was awarded a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013642

    Original file (20130013642.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * three character reference letters * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Evidence shows the applicant was discharged for misconduct by reason of fraudulent entry in 1977 and his DD Form 214 shows his character of service as "NA." _______ _ ___X____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019107

    Original file (20100019107.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the spelling of his first name as “Murrell” and that the suffix of “Jr.” be added to his name. The applicant states that his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects his first name as “Murrall” instead of “Murrell” and it does not contain the suffix “Jr.” His Honorable Discharge Certificate from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), issued on 1 January 1974, also does not contain...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019242

    Original file (20080019242.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Forms 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be changed to show the dates "10 Nov 1971 to 6 April 1972" and from "6 April 1972 to 23 May 1977." The applicant's DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract, Armed Forces of the United States) shows he had honorable prior service in the U. S. Army from 6 April 1972 to 5 April 1974 and that on his release date he held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4. The applicant contends that his separation document does not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025258

    Original file (20100025258.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFIP shall establish and maintain a procedure under which individual specimen samples shall be destroyed at the request of the donor following the conclusion by the donor of complete military service or other applicable relationship to the DoD. The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected by removing the entry, "SUBJECT TO ACTIVE DUTY RECALL BY THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY" because he wants the AFIP to destroy his DNA specimen sample. The governing Army regulation states...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000500

    Original file (20120000500.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A DA Form 664 (Serviceman's Statement Concerning Application for Compensation from the VA), dated 20 November 1968, shows the applicant acknowledged being processed for separation from active military service, he was advised that he was entitled to file an application for compensation from the VA, and he decided not to file an application at that time. A review of the applicant's military service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017271

    Original file (20110017271.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his voided enlistment be upgraded to an honorable discharge. His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 21 October 1976 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, by reason of a void enlistment. The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with eight offenses prior to enlisting and it appears he was convicted of one of the offenses.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007155

    Original file (20090007155.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code of RE-1 or an RE code which would allow his enlistment in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show that he was furnished an RE-1 code or an RE code that will allow his enlistment in the USAR. The applicant has provided no evidence to show that the RE code that was assigned to him is in...