Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022411
Original file (20110022411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  31 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110022411 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he remembers he was hurt in Vietnam in January 1969 or January 1970.  He has a piece of metal in his spine based on x-rays at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital.  He further states he has never been shot at since he's been out of the Army and that Vietnam is the only place he could have gotten it.

3.  The applicant provides:

* an undated letter from the VA Medical Center, Dayton, OH
* a witness letter from E--- K---------, dated 15 March 2007
* a witness statement from W------ F. D--------, dated 20 March 2007
* an undated witness statement from P------ B. C----
* an undated witness statement from C------ R. S------

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame 


provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 16 July 1968.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (light weapons infantryman).

3.  He served in Vietnam from 9 January 1969 to 28 February 1970 while assigned to Company B, 4th Battalion, 21st Infantry Regiment, 11th Infantry Brigade.

4.  Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) is blank.

5.  On 3 March 1970, he was honorably released from active duty as an overseas returnee and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining service obligation.  He completed 1 year, 7 months, and 3 days of total active service.

6.  The applicant's medical records are not contained in the available records.  Administrative documents in the applicant's military personnel file indicates his medical records were transferred to the VA in October 1970.

7.  Review of The Adjutant General's Office, Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty listing does not show the applicant's name as a casualty.

8.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

9.  The applicant provides a VA Medical Center letter that shows he was examined on 13 October 2011.  The letter reports:

Soft tissues of the neck done on 10/13/2011:  A small 2 mm size density is projected over the angle of the mandible in the lateral view.  I am unable to localizing [sic] in the frontal view.  I think it could represent shrapnel an [sic] foreign body.  In the cervical spine series it is seen in the left.


10.  The applicant provides four witness statements, two dated in 2007 and two undated.

	a.  E--- K---------- states he and the applicant served in Vietnam when his injury occurred.  While on combat patrol the lead point-man triggered an explosive device that severely wounded him (the writer) and injured the applicant.  He states the applicant was dazed and scratched up but did not think he was badly injured.  He further states after caring for the seriously injured point-man the applicant was treated by the field medic for what seemed to be cuts, abrasions, and minor shrapnel wounds.

	b.  W------ F. D-------- states he suffered the traumatic amputation of his left arm due to an enemy booby-trap.  While on combat patrol in January 1970 an enemy booby-trap exploded seriously injuring their point-man.  The applicant was dazed and bleeding from several cuts from the force of the explosion.  The applicant was patched up by their combat medic and stayed with his platoon in the field.

	c.  P------ B. C---- states he served proudly alongside of the applicant in Vietnam.  During a patrol, the lead point-man triggered a booby-trapped explosive device severely wounding him (the point man), and as they know now, sent a piece of shrapnel into the applicant's upper spinal area.  The applicant was covered with debris, but he did not seem badly injured.  The applicant stated he was not injured sufficiently enough to leave the field.

	d.  C------ T. S------ states that in January 1970 the applicant was hit.  He states the applicant was hit three times since July that he knew about.  The applicant was injured but he would not go and get checked out by the medic.  

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

12.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System),
chapter 9 of the version in effect at the time, stated a brief description of wounds or injuries (including injury from gas) requiring medical treatment received through hostile or enemy action, including those requiring hospitalization would be entered in item 40 (Wounds) of the DA Form 20.  This regulation further stated that the date the wound or injury occurred would also be placed in item 40.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that conclusively shows he was injured as a result of hostile action and treated for that injury.  The supporting statements by the applicant's fellow Soldiers indicate he was injured as a result of a tripped booby trap and that three of the four letters indicate he was treated by the unit medic.  However, there is no evidence of such medical treatment in his military record, which is a requisite for consideration for award of the Purple Heart.

2.  In view of the foregoing there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

3.  The applicant and all others concerned should know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X__  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022411



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022411



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000092C070205

    Original file (20060000092C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, dated 29 January 1988, which lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam, shows that the unit the applicant was assigned to, 1st Battalion, 22d Infantry Regiment, 4th Infantry Division, was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross, with Palm, Unit Citation, for the period 1 August 1965 through 16 April 1971, by Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) Number 54, dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000829

    Original file (20150000829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He has the piece of shrapnel that was taken from his arm while at the hospital. There is no medical evidence in his available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action while in an active duty status. He provides a statement of support wherein one individual stated the applicant was wounded in the arm and had not shot himself.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000485

    Original file (20130000485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. An artillery round jungle pack exploded. The letters of support and other evidence provided by the applicant has been reviewed; however, there was no investigation conducted at the time of the incident to show the explosion was the direct result of enemy action (a booby-trapped artillery round).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010945

    Original file (20140010945.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This regulation further stated that the date the wound or injury occurred would also be placed in item 40. c. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show award of the Purple Heart. He provides a document titled Rating Decision, dated 13 July 1971, which appears to be from VA. On the document it essentially states: * the applicant made a claim for service-connection for shrapnel wounds * available medical records did not show any treatment for shrapnel wounds but his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019657

    Original file (20140019657.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His medical records, which would have listed any injuries and treatment of such injuries, are not available for review with this case. The applicant's record remains void of any evidence and he has not provided any substantiating evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, that he was treated for such wounds by medical personnel, and that his treatment was made a matter of official record. Again, notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, in the absence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019671

    Original file (20110019671.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Concerning the applicant's Vietnam Service Medal: * his DD Form 214 showed only the Vietnam Service Medal * his record indicated he was entitled to 4 bronze service stars to be affixed to the medal * the original ROP (Docket Number AR20110000274) deleted the medal without bronze service stars, then added the medal with 4 bronze service stars * a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) accomplished the correction on 20 October 2011 The applicant's Vietnam Service Medal with 4 bronze service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005760

    Original file (20150005760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was in the lead vehicle with the applicant and two other Soldiers. The medical treatment for concussion that meets the standard of treatment necessary for award of the Purple Heart includes limitation of duty following the incident, pain medication such as acetaminophen to treat the injury, referral to a neurologist to treat the injury, and rehabilitation to treat the injury. The evidence of record the applicant provided shows that on 24 December 2007, in Iraq, he and three other...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017625

    Original file (20140017625.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was treated by a field medic; therefore, there are no records of this injury. d. The third wound is the one for which he is applying for correction of his record because a field medic provided a notarized statement regarding the injury he sustained as he jumped out of a helicopter during a combat assault. There are no medical records in his official military personnel file that show he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam and treated for such wounds.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010189

    Original file (20120010189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * He served in Vietnam as infantryman from August 1969 to June 1970; he was assigned as a platoon sergeant to A Company, 3rd Battalion, 503rd Infantry, 173rd Airborne Brigade * Between August and October 1969, he was wounded; his unit received small arms fire during a patrol; he dropped to the ground near a rock when a bullet hit the rock next to his hand and fragments injured his hand * After the shooting stopped, a medic examined his wound and gave him a topical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019982

    Original file (20130019982.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), chapter 9, stated a brief description of wounds or injuries (including injury from gas) requiring medical treatment received through hostile or enemy action, including those requiring hospitalization, would be entered in item 40 of the DA Form 20. Nothing in the following typical sources confirms his entitlement to the Air Medal: * his DA Form 20 does not list this award * his flight record is not available for review * his...