Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018975
Original file (20090018975.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 May 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090018975 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant states the AGCM is not on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and it was never received.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 January 1966.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty 13A (Field Artillery Basic).  He was honorably released from active duty on 24 January 1969 with 2 years,
11 months, and 28 days of creditable active military service.
3.  A DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following:

* in item 31 (Foreign Service), the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) during the period 12 December 1966 through 5 December 1967
* in item 44 (Time Lost Under Section 972, Title 10, U.S. Code and Subsequent to Normal Date ETS), the applicant was absent without leave (AWOL) from 3 September 1966 to 5 September 1966
* in item 38 (Record of Assignments), the applicant received a conduct/efficiency rating of fair/good for the period 6 September 1966 through 3 November 1966, and good/good for the period 15 January 1967 through 4 December 1967
* in item 38, the applicant received conduct/efficiency ratings of excellent for all other periods

4.  The applicant's record includes six DA Forms 2627-1 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ [Uniform Code of Military Justice]).  He accepted non-judicial punishment (NJP) for the following offenses:

     a.  AWOL during the period 3 September 1966 to 6 September 1966.  His punishment was reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $25.00 per month for 2 months, and restriction for 30 days.

     b.  Failing to obey a lawful order issued by a noncommissioned officer on
5 October 1966.  His punishment was a verbal reprimand, forfeiture of $20.00 pay for 1 month, and extra duty for 14 days.

     c.  Failing to go at the time prescribed to his place of duty on 18 January 1967 and absenting himself from his unit without proper authority on 27 January 1967.  His punishment was reduction to E-2, forfeiture of $15.00 per month for 1 month, and extra duty for 14 days.  His appeal of the punishment as being too severe was denied.

     d.  Violating curfew and wrongfully possessing an unauthorized pass with intent to deceive on 13 February 1967.  His punishment was reduction to E-1, and extra duty and restriction for 14 days.

     e.  Appearing in the headquarters battery area in an improper uniform on
16 June 1967.  His punishment was forfeiture of $20.00 for 1 month.

     f.  Exceeding the posted speed limit on Fort Meade, MD on 18 October 1968.  His punishment was forfeiture of $20 for 1 month.

5.  A DA Form 137 (Installation Clearance Record) completed prior to his released from active duty shows the applicant was recommended for the AGCM.

6.  The record is void of documentation showing the applicant was awarded the AGCM.

7.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, states the AGCM is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in General Orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request to be awarded the AGCM was carefully considered and not supported by the evidence in this case.

2.  Although the record shows the applicant was recommended for award of the AGCM on his DA Form 137, evidence of record shows he did not receive all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings during his service and he accepted NJP on six occasions.  There is no documentary evidence showing the recommendation for the AGCM was approved by the proper authority or that the GCM was awarded.  Therefore, he is not entitled to award of the AGCM.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018975



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018975



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019800

    Original file (20100019800.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received "good" conduct ratings during the periods from 2 October 1961 to 31 August 1963 and from 1 September 1963 to 8 December 1963. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. ___________x______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002712

    Original file (20120002712.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show this award. Army Regulation 672-5-2 (Awards), in effect at the time, states the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020974

    Original file (20100020974.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 11 May 1966. Additionally, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation was awarded to all units that served in Vietnam between 20 July 1965 and 28 March 1973 which were subordinate to Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam by DAGO Number 8, dated 1974. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003606

    Original file (20130003606.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 15 November 1963 through 31 October 1966 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 15 November 1963 through 31 October...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027422

    Original file (20100027422.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), and correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show this award. Army Regulation 672-5-2 (Awards), in effect at the time, states the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. ____________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003257

    Original file (20140003257.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the available military records that show he was awarded the AGCM. The evidence of record shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his active duty service and his records are void of derogatory information or a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being awarded the AGCM. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM for the period 7 August 1967 to 12 June 1970 and to add this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005679

    Original file (20080005679.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record shows that he received excellent ratings in conduct and efficiency during his period of active duty service as evidenced by his DA Forms 20 and 137. The applicant completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service from 10 November 1965 through 9 August 1967 with excellent conduct and efficiency ratings and no court-martial convictions, reductions in grade or lost time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017266

    Original file (20110017266.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests to be awarded the following: * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) * United Nations Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) * Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR) * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) * Overseas Service Bar * Imjin Scout Certificate 2. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006984

    Original file (20130006984.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 33 (Appointments and Reductions), that he was promoted to specialist five (SP5)/pay grade E-5 on 26 October 1967; b. item 38 (Record of Assignments), that he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service; and c. item 41 (Awards and Decorations): * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with (M-14) Rifle Bar 6. d. Based on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013943

    Original file (20110013943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 4 November 1966 through 3 August 1968 and to add this award to his DD Form 214. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.