Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020974
Original file (20100020974.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  8 March 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100020974 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  He states his DA Forms 137 (Installation Clearance Record) from two permanent duty stations show his conduct and efficiency as "excellent."  He adds that his DA Form 1315 (Reenlistment Data Card) shows he was recommended and eligible for reenlistment.  Additionally, he states the card was marked "excellent" in (Performance on Army Job).

3.  He provides the following:

* DA Forms 137
* DA Form 1315
* Special Orders Number 270, dated 27 September 1967

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 11 May 1966.  He served in the Republic of Vietnam from 
26 October 1966 to 25 October 1967 and he was assigned to Company A, 13th Signal  Battalion, 1st Cavalry Division.  He served 2 years on active duty and he was honorably released from active duty on 10 May 1968.

3.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the following:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar
* 2 Overseas Service Bars

4.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his period of service.  There is no record of any Article 15's, courts-martial, or any type of adverse action in his available records.  There is also no record of a commander's disqualification for the AGCM.

5.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards) provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.

6.  A review of his DD Form 214 indicates he is entitled to additional awards that are not shown on this form.

7.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units which served in the Vietnam War.  This document shows Company A, 13th Signal Battalion was cited for award of the Presidential Unit Citation by Department of the Army General (DAGO) Number 2, dated 1973 during the period he was assigned.  This document also shows that the13th Signal Battalion was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation by DAGO 17, dated 1968.  Additionally, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation was awarded to all units that served in Vietnam between 20 July 1965 and 28 March 1973 which were subordinate to Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam by DAGO Number 8, dated 1974.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraph 2-13, contains the regulatory guidance on the Vietnam Service Medal and states that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in.  Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, participation credit was awarded for the following two campaigns:

* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase II (1 July 1966 - 31 May 1967)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III (1 June 1967 - 29 January 1968)

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and he had no adverse actions or commander's disqualification for award of the AGCM.  Therefore, he is entitled to award of the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 11 May 1966 to 10 May 1968 and correction of his 
DD Form 214 to show this award.

2.  The evidence shows he is entitled to wear the Presidential Unit Citation, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and two bronze service stars to be worn on his Vietnam Service Medal.  Therefore, he is entitled to have them added his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x___  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION






BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 11 May 1966 to 
10 May 1968; 

	b.  deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; and 

   c.  adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the AGCM (1st Award), the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, the Presidential Unit Citation, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020974



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020974



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016739

    Original file (20110016739.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the available records that shows he was awarded the AGCM; however, neither is there evidence of a commander's disqualification for the award. There is no evidence of a commander's disqualification statement pertaining to his first award of the AGCM; therefore, he should be awarded the AGCM (1st Award), for the period 8 September 1966 and 6 September 1968, and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. Awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021203

    Original file (20110021203.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it appears the applicant should have received the first award of the AGCM for his service from 11 April 1967 through 10 April 1969. Therefore, in the interest of justice, this error should be corrected by awarding the applicant the AGCM (1st Award) and correcting his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011979

    Original file (20110011979.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. General orders awarded him the Air Medal which is not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004189

    Original file (20140004189.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings for all his assignments up to his wounding in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) on 20 January 1968. The evidence of record also shows he served in Vietnam from 2 August 1967 to 29 January 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 13 July...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000553

    Original file (20110000553.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards): a. states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that at the time of his assignment to HHC, 3rd Brigade, 4th Infantry Division, this unit was cited for award of the: * Presidential Unit Citation for the period 21 March 1967 by Department of the Army (DAGO) Number 59,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016834

    Original file (20130016834.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is entitled to award of the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 28 November 1966 to 19 November 1968 and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. The evidence also shows he participated in six campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 28 November 1966 to 19 November 1968; b. deleting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019908

    Original file (20110019908.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. In light of his overall record of service, it would...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008508

    Original file (20110008508.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (1st Award) based on completion of a qualifying period of active Federal service and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 22 November 1966 to 21 November 1969; b. deleting the VSM and "VN Unit Cit" from item 24 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 26...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005598

    Original file (20140005598 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about 6 October 1967 to on or about 21 September 1968. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states a bronze service star is authorized with the Vietnam Service Medal for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000509

    Original file (20100000509.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 29 (Qualification in Arms) that he qualified Marksman with the M-16 rifle on 29 December 1966; b. item 31 (Foreign Service) that he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 16 February 1967 through 7 April 1969; c. item 38 (Record of Assignments) that he was assigned to: (1) Signal Company, 5th Special Forces Group (Airborne), 1st Special Forces, from 21 February through 7 May 1967; (2) Headquarters and...