Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006984
Original file (20130006984.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  2 January 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130006984 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with 
(M-16) Rifle Bar.

2.  The applicant states he received only one copy of the orders awarding him the AGCM.  He sent it to the National Personnel Records Center when he requested issuance of his medals; however, the orders were not returned to him.  He also states the AGCM and Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with
(M-16) Rifle Bar are not recorded on his DD Form 214.  He adds that he wants his records to be accurate.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, badge orders, and a 
DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 June 1966 for a period of 
3 years.  He was awarded military occupational specialty 02F (Tuba Player).

3.  Headquarters, 2nd Basic Combat Training Brigade, U.S. Army Training Center, Infantry, Fort Dix, NJ, Special Orders Number 158, dated 27 July 1966, awarded the applicant the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with (M-14) Rifle Bar.

4.  Headquarters Special Troops, U.S. Army Training Center, Infantry, Fort Dix, NJ, Special Orders Number 129, dated 2 July 1968, awarded the applicant the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with (M-16) Rifle Bar.

5.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

   a.  item 33 (Appointments and Reductions), that he was promoted to specialist five (SP5)/pay grade E-5 on 26 October 1967;

	b.  item 38 (Record of Assignments), that he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service; and

   c.  item 41 (Awards and Decorations):
   
* National Defense Service Medal (NDSM)
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with (M-14) Rifle Bar

6.  A DA Form 137 (Installation Clearance Record), dated 27 May 1969, shows the applicant was assigned to the 19th Army Band, Fort Dix, NJ, and the commander rated the applicant's conduct and efficiency as "excellent."

7.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty on 13 June 1969.  He completed 3 years of net active service this period.

   a.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows the NDSM.

   b.  Item 25 (Education and Training Completed) shows, in part, "Sharpshooter M-14."

8.  A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal evidence of any disciplinary actions, adverse information, or a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being recommended for or awarded the AGCM (1st Award). 

9.  A DA Form 1577, dated 9 February 1976, shows The Adjutant General of the Army, Washington, DC, authorized issuance of the AGCM and NDSM to the applicant.

10.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than
3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.  

11.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribes policies and procedures regarding separation documents.  It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The instructions for completing:

   a.  item 26 state:  list all decorations, service medals, campaign medals, and badges (emphasis added) awarded or authorized during the period covered, omitting authorities cited therein; and

   b.  item 25, in pertinent part:  enter service schools, training courses, military correspondence courses, and off-duty courses successfully completed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the AGCM and Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with (M-16) Rifle Bar.

2.  The applicant served a period of continuous honorable active duty enlisted service from 14 June 1966 through 13 June 1969.

   a.  He was promoted to SP5 (E-5) and he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings during this period of service.

   b.  There is no evidence of any disciplinary actions, adverse information, or a commander's disqualification for the first award of the AGCM.

   c.  The Adjutant General of the Army issued the AGCM to the applicant on 
9 February 1976.  The applicant states he sent his orders to the National Personnel Records Center.

   d.  Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate at this time to add the AGCM (1st Award) to his DD Form 214.

3.  Special orders awarded the applicant the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with (M-16) Rifle Bar.

4.  Special orders also awarded the applicant the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with (M-14) Rifle Bar.  However, the evidence of record shows the badge was incorrectly recorded in item 25 (vice item 24) of his
DD Form 214.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct this record error.

5.  In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his awards and decorations, as recommended below.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  deleting from item 25 of his DD Form 214 the entry "Sharpshooter M-14"; and
   
   
   
   
   b.  adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the:

* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with (M-16) Rifle Bar
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with (M-14) Rifle Bar




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130006984



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130006984



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016625

    Original file (20110016625.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's records indicates he is entitled to additional awards which are not shown on his DD Form 214. The evidence of record shows he completed a qualifying period of service for award of the NDSM; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. Awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 18 March 1960 and 17 March 1963; b. Amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 to add the: * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007925

    Original file (20110007925.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Reception Station, Fort Dix, NJ on 22 August 1967; (2) he was assigned to B Company, 2nd Battalion, 8th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division, from 25 May to 24 December 1968 in duty MOS 11B with duties as a rifleman; (3) he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division on 25 December 1968 in duty MOS 11B with duties as an automatic rifleman; and (4) he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings; d. Item 41 – (Awards and Decorations)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004474

    Original file (20120004474.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows he was awarded 3 awards of the Bronze Star Medal, including 1 with the "V" Device. Therefore, he is entitled to 4 bronze service stars for wear on his previously-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these bronze service stars. Awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 13 February 1969 to 18 September 1970; and b. Amending his DD Form 214 to delete the Vietnam Service Medal and Bronze Star Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010854

    Original file (20090010854.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and any other awards and decorations he may have been eligible for at the time of his separation. As a result, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 9 February 1971 through 20 November 1972, and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006206

    Original file (20080006206.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Good Conduct Medal, and correction of his DD Form 214 to show the Good Conduct Medal, a Letter of Commendation, and completion of the Explosives and Demolitions Course. The applicant's records contain orders awarding him marksmanship badges which either do not appear, or incorrectly appear on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Good...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000161

    Original file (20150000161.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows: a. DAGOs awarded the applicant's unit the – * Valorous Unit Award * RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (3rd Award) * RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation b. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017807

    Original file (20140017807.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the following: * correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his award of the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar and Korea Defense Service Medal * award of the Army Good Conduct Medal 2. With regard to the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar, there is no evidence of record, i.e., orders, and he provided insufficient evidence showing he was awarded this badge during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006607

    Original file (20130006607.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 8 March 1967 to 7 March 1969; b. deleting the ARCOM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010615

    Original file (20120010615.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). His records show he served honorably throughout his period of active duty, including his service in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004413

    Original file (20140004413.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This publication shows that the 2nd Battalion, 35th Infantry Regiment, during the time of the applicant's assignment, was cited in Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 38, dated in 1970 for award of the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; and in DAGO Number 53, dated in 1970 for award of the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had...