Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015629
Original file (20090015629.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
		BOARD DATE:	  14 January 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090015629


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests:  deletion of Permanent Orders 326-31, dated 22 November 1999, awarding the 1st Army Good Conduct Medal; and deletion of Permanent Order 324-04, dated 19 November 2008, awarding the 3rd Army Good Conduct Medal, from his OMPF.

2.  The applicant states Permanent Orders 326-31 duplicates the action of awarding his first Army Good Conduct Medal which was accomplished by Permanent Orders 287-63, dated 14 October 1999.  He states that there are two versions of Permanent Order 324-04, dated 19 November 2008, in his OMPF; one incorrectly awards a 3rd Army Good Conduct Medal and the other correctly awards a 4th Army Good Conduct Medal.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of an electronic mail.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years on 4 September 1996.  He continues to serve on active duty in the rank of Sergeant First Class      (SFC/E-7).

2.  On 14 October 1999, Permanent Orders 287-63, Headquarters, US Army Artillery Center and Fort Sill, Fort Sill, OK awarded him the first Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 4 September 1996 through 3 September 1999.   On 22 November 1999, the same headquarters published Permanent Orders 326-31 accomplishing the same thing.
3.  On 19 November 2008, Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 505th Quartermaster Battalion, published two versions of Permanent Order 324-04.  One version awarded him the 3rd award of the Army Good Conduct Medal; the other version awarded him the 4th award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

4.  The applicant's periods of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal as shown on orders are:

1st Award		19960904 – 19990903
2nd Award	19990906 – 20020905
3rd Award	20021016 – 20051015
4th Award	20051015 – 20081014

5.  There is no evidence of record to show the applicant was ever disqualified for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests that two permanent orders involving award of the Army Good Conduct Medal be deleted from his OMPF because they are duplicates.

2.  Army Good Conduct Medals are issued for 3-year periods commencing on the date of enlistment on active duty.  The orders awarding the applicant's first Army Good Conduct Medal are the only correct orders in his OMPF; all subsequent orders are incorrect as to the periods of service.

3.  The applicant's periods of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal should be as follows:

1st Award		19960904 – 19990903
2nd Award	19990904 – 20020903
3rd Award	20020904 – 20050903
4th Award	20050904 – 20080903

4.  Only the October 1999 orders awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal is correct.  Therefore, his OMPF should be corrected as indicated below.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  ___x_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  revoking and removing the following orders:

		(1) Permanent Orders 326-31, Headquarters, US Army Artillery Center and Fort Sill, Fort Sill, OK, dated 22 November 1999; 

		(2) Permanent Orders 266-002, Headquarters, US Army Artillery Center and Fort Sill, Fort Sill, OK, dated 23 September 2002;

		(3) Permanent Order 324-04, Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 505th Quartermaster Battalion, Unit 35130, dated 19 November 2008 (awarding the 3rd award of the Army Good Conduct Medal);

		(4) Permanent Order 324-04, Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 505th Quartermaster Battalion, Unit 35130, dated 19 November 2008 (awarding the 4rd award of the Army Good Conduct Medal); and

		(5) Permanent Order 305-01, Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 505th Quartermaster Battalion, Unit 35130, dated 20 July 2009;

	b.  not filing the revocation order(s) in the individual's OMPF; and



	c.  issuing a new order awarding the Army Good Conduct Medal to the individual concerned for the following periods:

		(1) 2nd award – 19990904 – 20020903;

		(2) 3rd award – 20020904 – 20050903; and

		(3) 4th award – 20050904 – 20080903.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090015629



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090015629



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150008102

    Original file (20150008102.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the removal of Permanent Orders (PO) 324-001, dated 19 November 2012, and PO 324-001, dated 26 November 2012, from his official military personnel file (OMPF). His record contains: * PO 355-07, dated 21 December 2006, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * PO 363-003, dated 16 January 2010, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) 3. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011540

    Original file (20090011540.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of the following duplicate documents from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF): a. duplicate orders awarding him the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award); b. duplicate orders awarding him the Good Conduct Medal (4th Award); and c. duplicate memoranda, dated 10 August 2003, awarding him the Gold Recruiter Badge with three sapphire achievement stars. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was issued two sets of orders awarding him his second award of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015161

    Original file (20090015161.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 06 May 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090015161 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, in effect, the subject orders awarding him the second and third Army Good Conduct Medal have incorrect dates or the period of service is duplicated. The applicant’s OMPF contains: a. Bravo Detachment, 18th Personnel Services Battalion Permanent Orders Number 255-48, dated 11 September 2000, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010726C071029

    Original file (20060010726C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Permanent Orders 295-20, which awarded her the Good Conduct Medal, and which were rescinded, be removed from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant's request for removal of Permanent Orders 109-18 and Permanent Orders 295-20, which awarded her the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award and 3rd Award), for an incorrect period of good conduct, from her OMPF, has merit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016983

    Original file (20070016983.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant continues that a memorandum for the disqualification of the first award for the Army Good Conduct Medal was erroneously filed in his MPRJ (Military Personnel Jacket Record) and in the performance section of his OMPF. The applicant contends that the memorandum of disqualification, dated 9 February 2001, for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, filed in the performance portion of his OMPF should be removed. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016712

    Original file (20090016712.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends, in effect, that all traces of his court-martial should be removed from his OMPF or, if this is not possible, the court-martial documents should be transferred to the restricted portion of his OMPF because his NCOERs since that time show his professionalism and dedication to duty, but he has twice failed to be selected for promotion to SFC (E-7). The evidence of record shows that the court-martial order, dated 16 October 2003, is properly filed in the performance...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012137

    Original file (20140012137.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 14, from the Enlisted Records Brief, list formal in-service (full-time attendance) training courses successfully completed during the period of service covered by the DD Form 214. Therefore, she is entitled to correction of her DD Form 214 to show award of the Army Achievement Medal (3rd Award). With regard to the NATO Medal, the NATO Medal is not an Army award; therefore, this Board has no authority to award it.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003919

    Original file (20090003919.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records do not contain any adverse information, records show he served honorably and was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal during this period of service, and there is no evidence the applicant's commander denied him award of the Good Conduct Medal. Records show the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (6th Award). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013754

    Original file (20140013754.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the standard name line on the orders that awarded him the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (4th Award), to show his middle initial as "W" instead of "R." 2. The applicant's request for correction of the standard name line on the orders that awarded him the AGCM (4th Award) to show his middle initial as "W" instead of "R" was carefully considered. The evidence shows his middle initial is "W," not "R" as represented in the orders that awarded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020926

    Original file (20100020926.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of the erroneous award order, the revocation order, and the correct order awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (3rd Award). Corrected orders were issued for the applicant's 3rd award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * removing from his OMPF Permanent Orders Number 292-1, dated 8 November 2004, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (3rd...