Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013807
Original file (20090013807.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  17 February 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090013807 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show an honorable characterization of service.  He also requests the removal of that portion of the entry in item 23 (Authority and Reason): "unsatisfactory participant" from his NGB Form 22 (National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service).

2.  The applicant makes no statement. 

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and his NGB Form 22 in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Army National Guard on 26 May 1988.  He was awarded the military occupational specialty of motor transport operator, and was promoted to pay grade E-4.

3.  The applicant requested removal of the words "unsatisfactory participant" from item 23 of his NGB Form 22.

	a.  Paragraph 2-5, Section II, Army Regulation 15-185, the regulation under which this Board operates, states that the Board will not consider any application if it determines the applicant has not exhausted all administrative remedies available to him.  There is no evidence that the applicant has petitioned the Alabama Army National Guard (ALARNG) to correct the authority and reason for discharge on his NGB Form 22.

	b.  Paragraph 8-18 (Amendments and Corrections to NGB Form 22) of National Guard Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management) provides that when determined from official records that an NGB Form 22 contains error or omission of pertinent facts, discharge authorities may issue an NGB Form 22A (Correction of NGB Form 22).  Therefore, the applicant must first submit his request to the Adjutant General of the ALARNG.

	c.  In view of the foregoing, this portion of the applicant's request will not be further discussed in this record of proceedings.

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was relieved from active duty for training (ADT) due to "completion of ADT" with an "uncharacterized" character of service under the provision of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Separations), chapter 4. 

5.  Paragraph 4-2, Army Regulation 635-200 provides that the service of Soldiers in the Army National Guard of the U.S. and U.S. Army Reserve who successfully complete a period of initial active duty for training (IADT) and are in an entry level status will have uncharacterized service even though they have completed their IADT successfully.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part, it states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

Based on available records and regulatory policy the applicant's DD Form 214 appears to be correct as constituted.  As such, there is insufficient basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X__  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013807



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013807



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016453

    Original file (20100016453.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 December 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100016453 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that block 24 (Character of Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed to honorable.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007526

    Original file (20130007526.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Character of Service) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "honorable" instead of "uncharacterized." The letter states VA records certified she "separated under honorable conditions from active duty military service." Chapter 4 (Separation for Expiration of Service Obligation) states the service of ARNG Soldiers in an entry-level status upon completion of IADT will be uncharacterized even though they...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020291

    Original file (20120020291.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided evidence to show that her DD Form 214 for the period ending 24 February 1979 is in error. The applicant's active duty service and prior inactive service appear to be correct on her DD Form 214 for the period end 31 May 1997.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030310

    Original file (20100030310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of the deceased former service member (FSM), requests the characterization of her husband's active service for initial active duty for training (IADT), completed on 17 September 1992, be changed to honorable. Because the FSM was in an entry-level status at the time of his release from active duty, his period of active service was properly determined to be uncharacterized in accordance with the regulation in effect at the time. Therefore, the Board determined that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011516

    Original file (20080011516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that the characterization of service on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from “uncharacterized” to “honorable” and the reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from "NA" to "RE-1." Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028718

    Original file (20100028718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Character of Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "honorable," "under honorable conditions," or "general" rather than "uncharacterized." It specifies that "Soldiers of the ARNG and the USAR ordered to active duty for a period in excess of 90 days will, upon release from active duty, revert to control of the appropriate Reserve Component" and that the "service of Soldiers specified in this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011451

    Original file (20110011451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: * item 4b (Pay Grade) "E4" * item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) all commendations and medals authorized * item 24 (Character of Service) "Honorable" 2. g. Item 13 "Army Service Ribbon//Nothing Follows." His record is void of any evidence and he has not provided any evidence showing he completed any other...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007531

    Original file (20100007531.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her character of service as honorable instead of uncharacterized. The applicant's records show that she enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 16 March 1989 for a period of 8 years. Upon completion of her training, the applicant was released from active duty for training (ADT) on 22 February 1990 to her Minnesota ARNG (MNARNG) unit to complete her military service obligation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20080015386

    Original file (AR20080015386.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, he was ordered to active duty to attend basic training (BT) and advanced individual training (AIT); however, his discharge document shows his service as “active duty for training.” He also states he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal for 90 days of active service during the Gulf War. Chapter 1 (General), paragraph 1-3 (DD Form 214 - Report of Separation from Active Duty), states a DD Form 214 will be issued to all personnel at time of retirement,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011502

    Original file (20060011502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Upon completion of this 106 day period of active duty training she was released from active duty training with an uncharacterized separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4 for "Completion of Required Active Service" and assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code of "MBK." Chapter 4 of the regulation provides the guidance for "Separation for Expiration of Service Obligation" and states that a Soldier will be discharged or released from active duty upon...