Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007171
Original file (20070007171.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  22 January 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070007171 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Ms. Antoinette Farley

Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. James E. Vick

Chairperson

Mr. Thomas M. Ray

Member

Mr. Jeffrey C. Redmann

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his date of rank (DOR) to captain be corrected to show the effective date of 20 December 2000.

2.  The applicant states he is receiving credit for his DOR as a captain based upon his Federal Recognition re-appointment date of 14 December 2005 and not for his prior commissioned service on active duty and with the National Guard.  The applicant further states that the Federal Recognition Board did not utilize his application for Federal Recognition when calculating his DOR.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of US Army Military Personnel Center Orders 7-146; US Army Military Personnel Center Appointment authorization, dated 25 June 1987; State of North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, Office of The Adjutant General, Raleigh, North Carolina Orders 13-45, dated 16 January 1990; US Army Reserve Personnel Command Orders 
C-04-009719, dated 30 April 1990; State of North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, Office of The Adjutant General, Raleigh, North Carolina Orders 122-8, dated 29 May 1990; National Guard Federal Recognition Orders Number 142 AR, dated 24 July 1990; State of North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, Office of The Adjutant General, Raleigh, North Carolina Orders 113-72, dated 24 May 1991; National Guard Federal Recognition Orders Number 85 AR, dated 17 July 1995; NGB Form 22 (Departments of the Army and the Air Force, National Guard Bureau, Report of Separation and Record of Service), dated 1 March 1995; State of North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, Office of The Adjutant General, Raleigh, North Carolina Orders 349-871, dated 15 December 2005; NGB Form 337 (Oaths of Office), effective 14 December 2005; National Guard Federal Recognition Orders Number 126 AR, dated 12 May 2006; State of North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, Office of The Adjutant General, Raleigh, North Carolina Orders 044-846, dated 13 February 2006; DD Form 214, dated 17 October 2006; and a personal statement in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is currently serving in the North Carolina Army National Guard (NCARNG).

2.  Department of the Army, U.S. Total Army Personnel Command, St. Louis, Missouri, memorandum notified the applicant that he was promoted to the rank of captain effective 1 March 1986. 

3.  Department of the Army, U.S. Army Military Personnel Center, St. Louis, Missouri, memorandum, dated 25 June 1987, notified the applicant that he was appointed as a Reserve Commissioned Officer for an indefinite term. 

4.  On 13 March 1988, the applicant executed a DA Form 71 (Oath of Office – Military Personnel) as a captain in the NCARNG and was granted temporary Federal Recognition.

5.  On 16 January 1990, the applicant executed a second NGB Form 337 as a captain in the NCARNG.

6.  State of North Carolina, Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, Office of The Adjutant General, Raleigh, North Carolina, Orders 13-45, dated 16 January 1990 appointed the applicant in the Army National Guard in the rank of captain.  The applicant was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, 1st Battalion of the 113th Field Artillery North Carolina.

7.  Department of the Army, U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, Missouri Orders C-04-099719, dated 30 April 1990, relieved the applicant from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) effective 15 January 1990.

8.  State of North Carolina, Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, Office of the Adjutant General, Raleigh, North Carolina, Orders 122-8, dated 29 May 1990, show the applicant was transferred from Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, 1st Battalion, 113th Field Artillery, North Carolina to the Inactive National Guard (ING) effective 1 June 1990.

9.  National Guard Federal Recognition Orders Number 142 AR, dated 24 July 1990, show the applicant transferred to the Inactive National Guard (ING) effective 1 June 1990.  

10.  State of North Carolina, Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, Office of The Adjutant General, Raleigh, North Carolina, Orders 113-72, dated 24 May 1991, show the applicant was relieved from the ING and transferred to 2nd Battalion, 120th Infantry, NCARNG (Overstrength), effective 1 June 1991.

11.  National Guard Federal Recognition Orders Number 85 AR, dated 17 July 1995, show the applicant transferred from the Inactive National Guard (ING), effective 1 June 1991.  

12.  The applicant's records show that he was honorably separated from the NCARNG and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement), St. Louis, Missouri in the grade of captain on 1 March 1995.
13.  On 14 December 2005, the applicant executed a third NGB 337 as a captain in the NCARNG.

14.  National Guard Federal Recognition Orders Number 126 AR, dated 12 May 2006, show the applicant received an initial appointment to the grade of captain and was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 30th Heavy Brigade, North Carolina, effective 14 December 2005.  

15.  State of North Carolina, Department of Crime Control and Public Safety, Office of The Adjutant General, Raleigh, North Carolina, Orders 349-871, dated 15 December 2005, show the applicant was appointed in the Army National Guard to the rank of captain effective 14 December 2005.

16.  The applicant's record contains a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) which shows he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom on 3 June 2006.  He was honorably released from active duty on 17 October 2006, upon completion of his required active service. 

17.  The National Guard Bureau provided a two-page advisory opinion for review with this case.

18.  The Chief of the Personnel Division of the National Guard Bureau recommended that the applicant's date of rank be adjusted to 20 December 2000 based on the fact that the applicant never received credit for the time he served as a captain in the Regular Army and the Army National Guard.  It was further recommended that the applicant's initial appointment date remain as 14 December 2005.

19.  The applicant was provided a copy of the National Guard Bureau advisory opinion for review and comment.  On 1 June 2007, the applicant concurred with the advisory opinion and did not provide any written comments.

20.  National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officer-Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) provides procedures for processing applications for Federal Recognition.  Paragraph 2-1 states that commissioned officers of the ARNG are appointed by the several States under Article 1, Section 8 of the U. S. Constitution.  

21.  Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers) prescribes the policies and procedures for promotion of Reserve officers.  Paragraph 2-5 of this regulation states that to be 
eligible for consideration for promotion to the next higher grade, an ARNGUS or USAR officer must have continuously performed service on either the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) or the Active Duty List (ADL) or a combination of both lists during the 1– year period ending on the convening date of the promotion board and must meet the TIG requirements in tables 2-1 or 2-3, as appropriate.  

22.  National Guard Regulation 614-1, paragraph 4-6, provides in part that officers may not be considered for promotion for a period of 1 year following the most recent transfer back to an active status as required under National Guard Regulation 614-1, chapter 4, officer personnel.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his date of rank to captain should be adjusted to show the effective date as 20 December 2000. 

2.  Evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in the Regular Army, was selected for permanent promotion to the grade of captain/pay grade O-3, effective 1 March 1986.

3.  Evidence of record shows that the applicant was subsequently transferred to the ING during the period 1 June 1990 through 1 June 1991.  The applicant's records also show that he was relieved from the ING and transferred to the NCARNG, effective 1 June 1991.

4.  Evidence of record further shows that the applicant was separated from the Army National Guard and transferred to the United States Army Reserve on 1 March 1995, in the grade of captain.  The applicant's records show that Human Resources Command, St. Louis, notified him he was not recommended for promotion to Major on 2 June 1995.

5.  Evidence of record shows that the applicant was appointed as a captain in the NCARNG, effective 14 December 2005.

6.  Based on the foregoing, the applicant's records should be amended to show his date of appointment as a captain in the NCARNG as 14 December 2005, with a date of rank effective 20 December 2000.  If this adjustment results in the applicant's eligibility for consideration by a Department of the Army Mandatory Promotion Board, then his records should be considered under the appropriate criteria.



BOARD VOTE:

_JEV____  _TMR __  _JCR____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his date of appointment as a captain in the NCARNG as 14 December 2005, with a date of rank as effective 20 December 2000; and, if entitled, his records be placed before an appropriate Department of the Army Mandatory Promotion Board.




__James E. Vick__
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20070007171
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003552

    Original file (20080003552.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military service record shows he was appointed in the ARNG as an Armor officer, in the grade of 1LT/pay grade O-2, effective and with a DOR of 28 September 2006. These documents show, in pertinent part, the applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army, with appointment in the ARNG of the United States, in the grade of 2LT, effective 8 August 1992. b. These documents show, in pertinent part, the applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004741

    Original file (20110004741.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states the Discussions and Conclusions portion of his previous Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings noted he had signed a letter requesting a delay in promotion on 19 February 2009 after mobilizing and that there was no evidence showing exactly when he accepted promotion. The NGB recommended the applicant's DOR and effective date of promotion to LTC be corrected to 11 February 2009, the date of his mobilization under the provisions of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004651C070205

    Original file (20060004651C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of the DA Boards – Search Results printed on 20 July 2005; a memorandum from the Departments of the Army and Air Force National Guard Bureau, dated 26 September 2005; a memorandum from Headquarters 30th Corps Support Group North Carolina Army National Guard, dated 20 July 2005; Federal Recognition Special Orders Number 161 AR, dated 24 May 2005; Department of Crime Control and Public Safety Orders Number 132-809, dated 12 May 2005; a memorandum from Headquarters...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012482

    Original file (20110012482.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A memorandum, dated 29 November 2010, subject: Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army, shows he was promoted to CPT effective 29 November 2010. c. The advisory official confirms he met the MTIG, and the civilian and military education requirements, and he was assigned to a CPT position as shown by Orders 026-853, dated 26 January 2009. d. The advisory official recommends approval of the applicant's request and correction of NGB SO Number 266 AR to show his promotion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005458

    Original file (20080005458.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the case of an applicant being found qualified for Federal recognition as a CW2, in accordance with paragraph 2-10c(2) of this regulation, except for the successful completion of WOCS and Department of the Army certification, the following statement will be entered on the record of proceedings (NGB Form 89): "the applicant is qualified for appointment as a warrant officer in the Army National Guard and is extended temporary Federal recognition as a warrant officer WO1 as provided by NGR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003277C071029

    Original file (20070003277C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The memorandum advised of the promotion and three alternatives which the applicant could request for consideration: a. the applicant could request to be selected for a vacancy and accept promotion with continued assignment to the NCARNG, or b. request delay of promotion with continued assignment to the NCARNG in the present grade, or c. transfer to the United States Army Reserve to accept promotion. After having reviewed the evidence and available regulatory guidance, the NGB, Personnel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004562

    Original file (20070004562.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military service records to show he transferred to the Retired Reserve, effective 15 June 2005. The evidence of record shows that the applicant elected to be discharged from the ARNG and as a Reserve of the Army with 19 years of creditable service for retired pay. Thus, the evidence of record shows that the applicant completed 20 creditable years of service prior to the date he was discharged from the ARNG and as a Reserve of the Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019169

    Original file (20130019169.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he completed his Selected Reserve (SELRES) Special Pay Program service obligation. The evidence of record shows he was issued orders separating him effective 2 July 2010. There is no evidence the applicant was advised that the 8-day difference in the date of his appointment and SELRES Special pay contract date would result in recoupment of the entire special pay based on him being separated on 2 July 2010; two years after...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007474

    Original file (20120007474.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This change resulted in no National Guard warrant officers being promoted from January 2011 until 11 August 2011. NGB Policy Memorandum 11-015, Subject: Federal Recognition of WOs in the ARNG, dated 14 June 2011, states that ARNG WOs are initially appointed and are also promoted by the State or Territory to which the officer is assigned. The NGB issued orders extending Federal recognition to him as a CW4 effective 28 October 2011 despite him having been promoted by the State effective 18...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004501

    Original file (20120004501.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The J1 noted that both officers had been selected for promotion by the State Federal Recognition Board and the error in not processing their promotions to the NGB in a timely manner lay solely with the G1 section, not the officers. In view of the foregoing, especially considering the NGB advisory opinion's recommendation, it would be appropriate at this time to correct the applicant's records to show his State promotion packet was submitted in a timely manner and the applicant was extended...