Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012862
Original file (20090012862.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	  4 March 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090012862 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his rank as specialist four (SP4)/E-4; to delete the entry in Item 26a (Non-Pay Periods Time Lost), 
"30 APR 71 – 4 JUN 71"; and to change the entry in Item 30 (Remarks) 
"45 DAYS LOST UNDER 10 USC 972."

2.  The applicant states that his court-martial was reversed on appeal and he needs his records corrected to establish eligibility for certain benefits.

3.  The applicant does not provide any additional documents in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 28 July 1969, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (light weapons infantryman), and he was stationed in Europe.

3.  Between 10 November 1969 and 9 February 1971, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), on four occasions for being absent without leave (AWOL), on two occasions for failing to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty, and for disobeying a lawful order.  In the applicant's last NJP his punishment included a reduction from SP4/E-4 to private first class (PFC)/E-3.

4.  On 21 March 1971, the applicant was convicted by a summary court-martial for failure to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty.  He was sentenced to a reduction to private (PV2)/E-2 and restriction for 30 days.

5.  On 30 April 1971, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial for carrying a concealed weapon.  He was sentenced to confinement for 6 months, forfeiture of $90.00 a month for 6 months, and reduction to private (PV1)/E-1.  However, while the convening authority approved that portion of the sentence as pertained to the forfeiture of pay and reduction in grade, the convening authority only approved confinement for 37 days.

6.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 30 July 1971 as an early separation of an overseas returnee.  His DD Form 214 shows in item 5 a/b his rank as PV1/E-1; it shows in Item 26a the entry "3 NOV 69 - 4 NOV 69,
31 JUL 70 - 6 AUG 70, 30 APR 71 - 4 JUN 71"; and in Item 30 the entry "45 DAYS LOST UNDER 10 USC 972."

7.  The Department of Defense Pay Manual, Table 1-1-2, Rule 8 states that a period of absence is not creditable when the absence is because of confinement for more than one day (24 consecutive hours) while awaiting trial (if the trial results in conviction) or confinement as the result of the court-martial sentence.  In addition, Rule 2 of this table states that unauthorized absence of more than 1 day is not creditable service.  This precludes any pay and allowances for a period of AWOL of over 1 day.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence that the applicant's court-martial conviction was "reversed."  There is evidence that the 4 months confinement the applicant was sentenced to was reduced to confinement for 37 days.

2.  The timeframe 30 April to 4 June 1971 is 36 days, which equates to the applicant's modified sentence.  As such, it would appear the entry in Item 26a is correct.

3.  This 36 days of lost time, added to the applicant's other two periods of lost time, equals 45 days of lost time.  Therefore, the entry in Item 30 is also correct.

4.  In view of the foregoing there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090012862



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090012862



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011536C070208

    Original file (20040011536C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Leonard Hassell | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There is no evidence which indicates the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. However, the evidence of record shows he was convicted by a Special Court-Martial for being AWOL during these periods and was sentenced to confinement in the Post Stockade at Fort...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015874

    Original file (20090015874.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The record contains no documentation of any period of lost time except for the entries contained on his DD Form 214. Army Regulation 635-5 further stated that for block 30, if the individual lost any time prior to normal ETS as indicated on his/her DA Form 20, enter the total number of days lost with inclusive dates. The record contains no supporting documentation for the time lost entries on the DD Form 214 at blocks 26a and 30.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004487

    Original file (20140004487.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of the lost time from item 26a (Non-Pay Periods Time Lost) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). His DD Form 214 shows in: * item 10c (Date Inducted) - 23 September 1969 * item 11d (Effective Date (of Separation)) - 17 September 1971 * item 22a (1) (Net Service This Period) - 1-11-25 * item 22b (Total Active Service) - 1-11-25 * item 26a - 17 to 30 October 1970 * item 26b (Days Accrued Leave Paid) - -14 days 6....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028921

    Original file (20100028921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. He was discharged on 5 October 1973 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. _____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025368

    Original file (20100025368.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He also requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * he had less than 345 days of lost time * he held the rank/pay grade of private (PV2)/E-2 at the time of separation * he had 3 years of creditable active duty service * award of the Army Good Conduct Medal 2. The applicant contends that his undesirable discharge under other...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003446

    Original file (20120003446.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. _______ _x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120003446 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120003446 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003816

    Original file (20120003816.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was reduced to PV1/E-1 by the authority of Special Court-Martial Orders Number 231, effective 22 October 1970. The applicant was convicted by a special court-martial on 22 October 1970 and he was sentenced to reduction to PV1/E1. There is no evidence in his records and he did not provide any evidence that shows a competent legal authority restored his rank or an appropriate promotion authority...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010312

    Original file (20110010312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his rank/grade as specialist four (SP4)/E-4 or sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and for his lost time to be removed from his DD Form 214. The applicant provides DA Form 2166-5, dated 9 January 1975, wherein he was rated for his duty performance while serving in HHC, 1st Battalion, 32d Infantry, as a wheeled vehicle mechanic in duty MOS 63B1O. The evidence of record shows the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013137

    Original file (20110013137.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides in support of his application: * Two Army medical records * DA Form 20 * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) * ADRB letters * Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) records * Social Security Statement * VA decision and medical records CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. c. Therefore, based on the available evidence, it would...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013489

    Original file (20080013489.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 20 January 1975, the applicant was discharged accordingly.