Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003816
Original file (20120003816.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  6 September 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120003816 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests restoration of his rank/grade to specialist four (SP4)/
E-4. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, after he was released from the Correctional Training Facility his commander informed him that he had talked to officers at the Pentagon and he was asked by them to give him a message that stated they had made a mistake in sending him to prison and that he would be issued an honorable discharge.  It is logical to presume that if they made a mistake in sending him to prison, they also made a mistake by taking his rank. 

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* Special Court-Martial Orders Number 231

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show, on 7 February 1968, he was inducted into the Army of the United States and he held military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman). 

3.  He served in Vietnam from on or about 19 February 1969 to 1 February 1970. While in Vietnam, he was honorably discharged on 14 August 1969 for the purpose of immediate enlistment in the Regular Army (RA).  He enlisted in the RA on 15 August 1969.

4.  Also while in Vietnam, Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division published:

* Special Orders Number 43, promoting him to private first class/E-3, effective 12 February 1969
* Special Orders Number 222, promoting him to SP4/E-4 effective 12 July 1969

5.  On 14 October 1970, he was convicted by a special court-martial of being absent without leave from 16 March to 8 September 1970.  The Court sentenced him to confinement at hard labor for 5 months, a forfeiture of $80.00 pay for 
5 months, and a reduction to private (PV1)/E-1.  The convening authority approved the sentence on 22 October 1970.

6.  On 27 January 1971, the unexecuted portion of the applicant's sentence pertaining to confinement at hard labor and a forfeiture of pay was ordered remitted.  

7.  On 24 February 1971, Headquarters, U.S. Army Correctional Training Facility, Fort Riley, KS, published Special Orders Number 36 ordering his discharge from the RA, effective 26 February 1971.  These orders listed his rank as a PV1.

8.  Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was reduced to PV1/E-1 by the authority of Special Court-Martial Orders Number 231, effective 22 October 1970.

9.  His service records do not contain official orders promoting him back to SP4/E-4.

10.  He was honorably released from active duty on 26 February 1971.  His 
DD Form 214 shows in:

* Items 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 5b (Pay Grade) the entries "PV1" and "E-1" respectively
* Item 6 (Date of Rank) shows the entry "22 Oct 70 (22 October 1970)"

11.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), in effect at the time, prescribed policies, responsibilities, and procedures pertaining to career management of Army enlisted personnel.  Chapter 7 contained Army-wide promotion policy and procedures.  It stated, in pertinent part, that the promotion of enlisted personnel to grade E-5 through E-9, appointments, grade reductions, and grade restoration were announced in orders.  

12.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 of the regulation in effect at the time contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states items 5a and 5b will show the active duty rank and pay grade at time of the Soldier's separation.  The rank is taken from the Soldier’s promotion/reduction orders and item 6 shows the date of rank.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was convicted by a special court-martial on 22 October 1970 and he was sentenced to reduction to PV1/E1.  There is no evidence in his records and he did not provide any evidence that shows a competent legal authority restored his rank or an appropriate promotion authority promoted him back to SP4/E-4.  His DA Form 20 shows the reduction to PV1/E-1 and his separation orders listed his rank as a PV1.  

2.  In the absence of documentary evidence confirming he was promoted or appointed back to the rank of SP4/E-4 there is insufficient evidence to grant him the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X ___  ___X____  ___X  ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120003816



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120003816



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011488

    Original file (20120011488.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. Special Orders Number 231 that promoted the applicant to SGT/E-5 effective 4 August 1971 are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to amend items 5a, 5b, and 6 of his DD Form 214. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected accordingly.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010796

    Original file (20120010796.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 24 February 1969 in the rank/grade of private/E-1. There are no special orders in the applicant’s record that show he was promoted to SGT/E-5. The evidence of record shows that at the time of separation, 24 February 1971, the applicant held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023091

    Original file (20110023091.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DA Form 2495 (Disposition Form), dated 10 August 1971, subject: 1st Aircraft Maintenance Battalion Promotion Standing List, with Recommended List for Promotion of Enlisted Personnel to Pay Grade E-5 * Special Orders Number 277, U.S. Army Flight Training Center and Fort Stewart, Fort Stewart, GA, dated 13 October 1971 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. He appeared before the 1st Aircraft Maintenance Battalion Promotion Board on 5 August 1971 and was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013335

    Original file (20130013335.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He would like to have his DD Form 214 corrected to show his rank and pay grade as E-4. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) he was promoted to pay grade E-2 on 20 December 1969; the advancement to pay grade E-3 and promotion to pay grade E-4 are lined through * Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) all the awards listed on his DD Form 214 8. Without evidence, it appears his pay grade was E-2 at time his separation on 7 June 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021244

    Original file (20090021244.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 25 June 1971 and other applicable military records to show his rank as specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4 instead of private (PV2)/pay grade E-2. The applicant's record contains Headquarters, 97th Quartermaster Battalion, Special Orders Number 30, dated 16...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016458

    Original file (20080016458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 February 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080016458 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provided a Certificate of Appreciation for service in the Armed Forces of the United States during the period 18 November 1969 through 22 June 1971 that shows his rank as SGT. Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the ending period of 22 June 1971, which shows he was promoted on 16 September 1970 to the rank of SP4/E-4, is correct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023829

    Original file (20110023829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant did not provide any evidence. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. There is no evidence that he was promoted or appointed above this rank/grade between the date of reduction and the date of separation from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010650

    Original file (20090010650.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no special orders in the applicant’s record that show he was promoted to SGT/E-5. The evidence of record shows that at the time of separation, 16 February 1973, the applicant held the rank/grade of SP4/E-4. Promotions of enlisted personnel to grades E-5 through E-9 were announced in orders.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029248

    Original file (20100029248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show he held the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5 instead of specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4 at the time of release from active duty. The applicant states, in effect, he appeared before a board to be considered for promotion to SGT/E-5 and it was granted; however, his DD Form 214 shows he was discharged in the rank/grade of SP4/E-4. His record contains no evidence and he has failed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018209

    Original file (20130018209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected show: * his rank as sergeant (SGT) * he was assigned as a Drill Instructor and awarded the associated military occupational specialty (MOS) 2. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 includes an entry showing he was assigned to HHD, 2nd Battalion, 1st Brigade, Fort Jackson, SC, in duty MOS 00F4O Drill Sergeant, effective 3 August 1970. The applicant’s...