Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012669
Original file (20090012669.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	 15 December 2009 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090012669 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant states that she served for a period of 3 years without any incident and was awarded the Army Commendation Medal.  She believes she should have received the Army Good Conduct Medal and would like it added to her records.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), dated 2 September 1977, in support of her request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show she enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 3 September 1974.  She completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 76Y (Supply Specialist).  She was promoted through the ranks to specialist four (SP4)/E-4 on 11 December 1975.

3.  The applicant’s records also show she completed the Standard Installation Division Personnel System (SIDPERS) Course on 27 February 1975 and was subsequently awarded secondary MOS 71B (Clerk Typist).

4.  On 15 January 1976, 8 November 1976, and 18 March 1976, the applicant received three separate letters of commendation and/or appreciation from various members of her chain of command for outstanding performance as a SIDPERS clerk.

5.  The applicant was honorably discharged on 2 September 1977 by reason of completion of her required service.  The DD Form 214 she was issued shows she completed 3 years of creditable active service and was fully eligible to reenlist.

6.  Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows she was awarded the Army Commendation Medal.

7.  There are no orders in the applicant's records that show she was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal.

8.  A review of the applicant's service record shows no derogatory information in the form of nonjudicial punishment, lost time, or suspension of favorable personnel action that would have disqualified her for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record confirms that the applicant served honorably during the period from 3 September 1974 through 2 September 1977.  She attained the rank/grade of SP4/E-4 and was awarded the Army Commendation Medal and received multiple letters of appreciation and/or commendation.  Furthermore, her record is void of any lost time, nonjudicial punishment, or suspension of favorable personnel actions.

2.  Lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified her, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service and to correct her records to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during the period from 3 September 1974 through 2 September 1977 and adding this award to her DD Form 214.



      ___________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090012669



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090012669



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010937C080407

    Original file (20070010937C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 20 August 1976, the Commander, United States Army Health Services Command (HSC), issued the applicant a letter of appreciation indicating that the United States Army Forces Command (FORSCOM) and Department of the Army (DA) Awards Boards completed their review of the recommendations for award submitted on personnel who participated in Operation New Arrivals, and although her services during this operation were extraordinary, the current awards policy regrettably precluded favorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014849

    Original file (20100014849.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB), and that he was promoted to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5. Records show that, subsequent to the applicant's period of AWOL, he served a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service for award of the AGCM from 9 December 1973 through 8 December 1976. a. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004760

    Original file (20070004760.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 September 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070004760 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served a period of qualifying service for award of the National Defense Service Medal; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011694

    Original file (20090011694.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and seven other awards and badges he earned; and that he be provided a copy of his separation documents. As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 17 October 1974 through 16 October 1977 and to add this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022502

    Original file (20120022502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show she was promoted to the rank of sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5. The applicant provides: * a letter, dated 13 November 1976, from Headquarters, Headquarters Detachment, 817th Personnel and Administration Battalion (FA), James W. Reese U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Center, Upland, Chester, PA * Headquarters, First U.S. Army, Fort George G. Meade, MD, Orders 119-230, dated 18 July 1977 * her Honorable Discharge Certificate * her letter, dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008599

    Original file (20080008599.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records do not show that he was awarded the Korea Defense Service Medal. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Good Conduct Medal for the period 29 October 1974 to 28 October 1977, and correction of his military records to show the award of the Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Good Conduct Medal for the period 29...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075320C070403

    Original file (2002075320C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board notes that there is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any which supports her contention that she qualified with a military weapon and was awarded an associated badge. The Board also notes that there is no evidence the applicant was ever recommended for, or awarded a personal decoration. However, the applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal on 15 September 1976.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018529

    Original file (20080018529.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his first period of military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019489

    Original file (20080019489.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel record which show that she was awarded the Army Commendation Medal. The available evidence also shows the applicant completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service for award of the Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal for the period 31 July 1974 through 30 July 1977; b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011562

    Original file (20080011562.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that she attended the Officer Candidate School (OCS) and the Basic Leadership Course at Fort Hood, Texas, and the Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) training at the Hampton Institute, Norfolk, Virginia. The applicant's records show she enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 27 January 1975. The evidence of record shows that the highest rank the applicant attained during her military service was SP4/E-4.