| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Gale J. Thomas | Analyst |
| Ms. Celia L. Adolphi | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Ted S. Kanamine | Member | |
| Mr. Conrad V. Meyer | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to reflect entitlement to any awards and decorations which she would have earned during her period of military service. She states that her separation document does not reflect any awards or decorations but she recalls wearing several on her dress uniform. She specifically notes, in effect, that one of the awards resulted from her qualification as an expert with the rifle. She submits no evidence in support of her request.
3. Records available to the Board indicate that the applicant entered active duty on 23 September 1974 for a period of 2 years as part of 2-year enlistment option, which included assignment to Europe. The applicant completed training at Fort McClellan, Alabama and in February 1975 was assigned as a clerk typist with the 7th Signal Brigade in Germany.
4. The applicant remained in Europe until September 1976 when she returned to the United States and was separated under an Army program which permitted the early separation of soldiers returning from overseas who had insufficient remaining service to warrant reassignment. The applicant was released from active duty in pay grade E-4 with an honorable characterization of service. Neither her separation document, nor her military personnel file reflects entitlement to any awards.
5. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states that United States Army Basic Marksmanship Qualification Badges are awarded to indicate the degree in which an individual has qualified in a prescribed record course. The badges are awarded in three classes; expert, sharpshooter, and marksman. Between 1963 and 1974 military women did not undergo any weapons training. Commencing on 12 July 1974 enlisted women attending basic training began a sixteen-hour course to familiarize them with the M16 rifle; firing the weapon was voluntary. It was not until after 1 July 1975 that women's basic training contained a forty-hour course that included familiarization with and qualification on the M16 and other hand-held weapons. There is no indication in the applicant's file that she ever completed a prescribed record course or any information which indicates she was awarded any United States Army Basic Marksmanship Qualification Badges.
6. Historical files maintained by the 7th Signal Brigade indicate that the brigade was activated in 1970. A review of Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 does not indicate that the brigade was awarded any unit decorations during the applicant's period of assignment with the organization. Additionally, individuals serving on active duty between 15 August 1974 and 1 August 1990 were not awarded the National Defense Service Medal. Personnel decorations, like the Army Commendation Medal, required a recommendation, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders.
7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified. Current practice requires that the commander provide written notice of nonfavorable consideration and permits the individual to respond. There is no evidence in the applicant's official military personnel file that her commander ever disqualified her for award of the Good Conduct Medal and no evidence of any misconduct or disciplinary action.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. Based on the dates of the applicant's military service and the institution of weapons qualification for military women in 1975 during basic training, it is unlikely that she was ever awarded a qualification badge. The Board notes that there is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any which supports her contention that she qualified with a military weapon and was awarded an associated badge. In the absence of such evidence, there is no basis to correct her records.
2. Additionally, the Board notes that the applicant would not have been eligible for award of the National Defense Service Medal and there is no evidence that her unit of assignment was awarded any unit awards during her tenure with the organization. As such, there is no evidence that the applicant was entitled to any of the usual awards one would associate with military service. The Board also notes that there is no evidence the applicant was ever recommended for, or awarded a personal decoration.
3. However, the applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal on 15 September 1976. There is no evidence her commander ever disqualified her from receiving the award and no evidence of any misconduct which would justify denying her the award. In view of the foregoing, the Board concludes that the applicant met the basic qualifications for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and it would be appropriate and in the interest of equity to award her that decoration for the period 23 September 1974 through 15 September 1976.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 23 September 1974 through 15 September 1976.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__CLA __ __TSK __ __CVM__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
____Celia L. Adolphi______
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002075320 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20021210 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003938
Item 10 (Reenlistment code) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows his RE Code as 1b. Army Regulation 640-2-1 (Personnel Qualification Records), in effect at the time, provided that letters of commendation, certificates of achievement, and service stars would not be recorded on the DA Form 2-1. There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records and the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence showing that he was either awarded or entitled to be awarded the Expert...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010942C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 August 1975 to show award of the Army Commendation Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, the Vietnam Service Medal with two or three bronze service stars, the Presidential Unit Citation, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, and the Valorous Unit Award. Evidence of record shows the applicant served a period of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021177
The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his award of the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with M16 Rifle and 81mm Mortar bars. After carefully examining the applicants record of service, it appears that the applicant should have received the first award of the AGCM for his service from 27 November 1967 through 26 November 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008319
The applicant requests: a. award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for his first period of active duty from 1959 to 1962; and b. award of marksmanship qualification badges for the M-1, M-14, and M-16 rifles, M-60 machine gun, M-79 grenade launcher, and .45 caliber pistol. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075571C070403
Two general orders awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal are in his file -- General Orders 1868, Headquarters, U. S. Army, Europe and Seventh Army dated 16 April 1975 (awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 14 December 1969 to 13 December 1972) and General Orders 210, Headquarters, U. S. Army Field Artillery Center and Fort Sill dated 21 January 1974 (awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal third award for the period 14 December 1972 to 13 December 1975). His...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004052
The applicant requests correction of his records to show the service training courses he successfully completed and all of his awards and decorations. She requests correction of his records to show the service training courses he successfully completed and all of his awards and decorations. The applicant served a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) from 11 September 1950 to 10 May 1952. a.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013956
The applicants records do not contain special orders that show he was awarded a Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar. Special orders show that the applicant was awarded the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun Bar (M-60) which are not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these badges. As a result, the Board recommends that all...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012755
x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any orders, or other documents that show he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB or Driver's Badge by proper authority while serving on active duty. However, his records are void of any orders or other documents confirming he met the qualifications for or that he was ever recommended for or awarded the Driver's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005280
The applicant requests correction of his military records by including an incident report. This incident was not recorded in his service records. The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document, along with his application will be filed in his Official Military Personnel File.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002535
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 16 August 1976 to show: * his status as a Vietnam era veteran vice post-Vietnam veteran * the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16), and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar 2. Therefore, there is no basis for entering any marksmanship qualification badges on the DD Form 214 documenting...