Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011494
Original file (20090011494.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 November 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090011494 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, amendment of his active duty orders to reflect his rank as first lieutenant.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was promoted to first lieutenant on 14 April 2009 and extended Federal recognition on 30 April 2009 in the Arkansas Army National Guard (ARNG) prior to entering active duty.  He also states, in effect, that he was originally "scrolled" for appointment in the Regular Army on 27 February 2009 as a second lieutenant.  He was promoted to first lieutenant between the time of his assignment to the ARNG and entering active duty.  He was advised that he had two options for correcting his rank, he could either enter active duty and get it fixed or continue to stay in a Reserve status until the issue was fixed.

3.  In support of his application, the applicant provides copies of his second lieutenant appointment memorandum and Federal recognition orders, his first lieutenant promotion and Federal recognition orders, his active duty orders, his separation orders, his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), his Federal recognition withdrawal orders, a scroll of the individuals appointed in the Regular Army Medical Service Corps, and his active duty oath of office.


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's military records show he was appointed in the Arkansas ARNG Medical Service Corps as a second lieutenant effective 28 December 2007 with a date of rank of 6 November 2007.

2.  Arkansas ARNG Orders 104-888, dated 14 April 2009, were issued showing the applicant was promoted to first lieutenant with an effective date of 14 April 2009.

3.  U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), St. Louis, Missouri, Orders A-04-911958, dated 23 April 2009, were issued showing the applicant was ordered to active duty in a voluntary indefinite status in the rank of second lieutenant with a reporting date of 2 June 2009.

4.  NGB Special Orders Number 108 AR, dated 30 April 2009, were issued showing the applicant was extended Federal recognition in the rank of first lieutenant with an effective date of 14 April 2009.

5.  Arkansas ARNG Orders 149-830, dated 29 May 2009, were issued showing the applicant was separated from the Arkansas ARNG in the rank of first lieutenant effective 1 June 2009.  He was also issued an NGB Form 22 which shows he was separated in the rank of first lieutenant with a date of rank of 14 April 2009.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Individual Ready Reserve).

6.  NGB Special Orders Number 134 AR, dated 2 June 2009, were issued withdrawing the applicant’s Federal recognition based on his transfer to the USAR.  His rank is shown as first lieutenant.

7.  The applicant was appointed in the Regular Army Medical Service Corps as a first lieutenant effective 1 June 2009.

8.  The applicant submitted a copy of a scroll of individuals appointed in the Regular Army Medical Service Corps.  His name is listed with the rank of first lieutenant.

9.  In an advisory opinion, dated 10 September 2009, the Chief, Personnel Division, NGB, reiterated the applicant's request.  The NGB Personnel Division recommended approval of the applicant’s request to amend HRC 
Orders A-04-911958, dated 23 April 2009, to reflect the rank of first lieutenant.  The recommendation is based on the documentation which shows the applicant’s promotion to first lieutenant effective 14 April 2009, prior to entering the Regular Army on 1 June 2009.  NGB Special Orders Number 108 AR, dated 30 April 2009, and Arkansas ARNG Orders 104-888, dated 14 April 2009, indicate the applicant was promoted to first lieutenant 14 April 2009.

10.  The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for acknowledgement and/or rebuttal on 30 September 2009 and he concurred 1 October 2009.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In view of the circumstances in this case, the applicant is entitled to an amendment to his active duty orders HRC St. Louis Orders A-04-911958, dated 23 April 2009, to reflect his rank as first lieutenant.

2.  The evidence shows that the applicant was promoted to first lieutenant effective 14 April 2009 while serving in the Arkansas ARNG.  On 23 April 2009, HRC issued orders ordering the applicant to active duty.  The orders show his rank as second lieutenant.  The applicant was separated from the Arkansas ARNG on 1 June 2009 and entered active duty on 2 June 2009.  The evidence shows the applicant was promoted to first lieutenant prior to entering active duty; therefore, his active orders should be corrected to reflect the rank of first lieutenant.

3.  It is concluded that based on a matter of equity and the support for favorable consideration expressed by the NGB Personnel Division, the applicant should be granted relief as recommended.

4.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s Department of the Army records should be corrected as recommended below.

BOARD VOTE:

____x____  ___x_____  ___x_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending HRC St. Louis Orders A-04-911958, dated 23 April 2009, to reflect the applicant’s rank as first lieutenant and providing him with corrected orders based on this action and by paying him any pay and allowances due as a result of this correction.



      ___________x______________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011494



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011494



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009398

    Original file (20140009398.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * first lieutenant (1LT) promotion memorandum, dated 5 May 2009 * NGB Special Orders Number 112 AR, dated 5 May 2009 * recommendation for promotion memorandum, dated 21 April 2011 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board), dated 1 June 2011 * ARARNG Orders 195-834, dated 14 July 2011 * NGB Special Orders Number 265 AR, dated 24 October 2011 * memorandum for record, dated 19 May 2014 * Officer Record Brief, dated 7...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006794

    Original file (20090006794.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The advisory official indicated the NGB recommended disapproval of the applicant's request to have his CPT DOR changed from 21 December 2006 to 12 July 2006 because his promotion was based on a position vacancy. This recommendation was based on the promotion regulatory guidance contained in the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA) for position vacancy promotions which provides that the effective date of an ARNG commissioned officer who is promoted in the State under the position...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021419

    Original file (20120021419.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. The applicant provides: * chronological outline * Officer Record Brief * Personnel Qualification Record – Officers/WOs * DA Form 705 (Army Physical Fitness Test Scorecard) * Individual Medical Readiness * 2008 LAARNG appointment orders * 2009 ARARNG WO1 appointment orders * interstate transfer orders * 2009 and 2011 FREB Proceedings * DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) * Recommendation for Promotion to CW2 * 2011 NGB 62E (Application for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001493

    Original file (20120001493.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an adjustment of his Federal recognition order for promotion to chief warrant officer two (CW2) from 10 November 2011 to 5 June 2011. However, in January 2011 the National Defense Authorization Action (NDAA) changed the warrant officer (WO) promotion protocol causing a backlog and his Federal recognition was delayed until 10 November 2011, which is the date the Secretary of Defense signed his promotion scroll. The evidence of record shows the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011713

    Original file (20090011713.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 April 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090011713 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states: * he became promotable to captain on 9 January 2008 * 9 January 2008 was the agreed upon effective date of rank before multiple delays * the date of his State promotion and Federal recognition is 24 April 2008 * his promotion was delayed 225 days from the date he mobilized into a captain's position * he served in a captain's position for 8 months...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022918

    Original file (20120022918.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * two NGB Forms 89 * two appointment orders * two NGB Forms 337 (Oaths of Office) * NGB Form 62E (Application for Federal Recognition as an ARNG Officer or Warrant Officer and Appointment as a Reserve Commissioned Officer or Warrant Officer of the Army in the ARNG of the United States) * NGB Special Orders CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. On 19 July 2012, the applicant completed an NGB Form 62E requesting Federal recognition as a CPT with appointment as a Reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008292

    Original file (20120008292.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his effective date for promotion to captain, pay grade O-3 as 20 November 2010. The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show his effective date for promotion to captain, pay grade O-3 as 20 November 2010 because of the time it took to evaluate his service for constructive credit as an MS officer. In addition, since he was not appointed as an MS officer until 21 January 2011, it does not appear...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012980

    Original file (20120012980.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 18 April 2011, the request for an ETP was approved by NGB allowing for the applicant's promotion packet to go before the State Federal Recognition Board. National Defense Authorization Action (NDAA) for Fiscal year 2001, dated 22 July 2011, subject: Changes to WO Federal Recognition Process, states all initial appointments of WO's and promotion to higher grades, by warrant or commission, will be issued by the President (delegated to the Secretary of Defense) effective 7 January 2011. As...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012769

    Original file (20100012769.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * Original appointment to second lieutenant was 1 March 2005 * The 6-month temporary Federal recognition expired before the Secretary of Defense signed the appointment scroll * He was reappointed by a subsequent Federal Recognition Board on 28 July 2009 * He did get promoted to first lieutenant without his initial permanent Federal recognition but was notified that he needed his initial permanent Federal recognition before he could be promoted to captain * Since his DOR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003656

    Original file (20120003656.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests a change of his date of rank (DOR) to chief warrant officer four (CW4) from 2 December 2011 to 20 May 2011. The applicant states that prior to enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2011, all Army National Guard (ARNG) warrant officers (WO) were promoted by the Chief, NGB and the Secretary of the Army. With the signing of the NDAA 2011 into law, promotions were elevated from the Secretary of the Service to the President of the United States and...