Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011713
Original file (20090011713.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 April 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090011713 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his date of rank to captain (O-3) be changed from 20 August 2008 to 9 January 2008 or 24 April 2008.

2.  The applicant states:

* he became promotable to captain on 9 January 2008
* 9 January 2008 was the agreed upon effective date of rank before multiple delays
* the date of his State promotion and Federal recognition is 24 April 2008
* his promotion was delayed 225 days from the date he mobilized into a captain's position
* he served in a captain's position for 8 months without time in grade and pay being counted

3.  The applicant provides:

* two Memoranda for Record dated 23 January 2009
* Assumption of Command Memorandum dated 9 January 2008
* Recommendation for Promotion Memorandum dated 20 March 2008
* Orders 158-804 dated 6 June 2008 promoting him to captain
* Promotion Notification dated 22 August 2008
* National Guard Bureau (NGB) Special Orders Number 218 AR dated 22 August 2008
* Orders 166-013 dated 15 June 2005 promoting him to first lieutenant
* Promotion Notification dated 30 June 2005
* NGB Special Orders Number 197 AR dated 30 June 2005
* two Officer Evaluation Reports
* Copies of assignment orders
* Request for 314 day tour for Contingency Operation for Active Duty Operational Support (CO-ADOS) dated 22 November 2008
* Memorandum for Record dated 27 December 2007
* Volunteer/Waiver Statement
* Recommendation for Promotion dated 20 March 2008
* Officer Promotion Checklist
* Numerous electronic mail between him Army officials.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  With prior enlisted Army National Guard (ARNG) service, the applicant accepted an appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer in the rank and pay grade of second lieutenant (O-1) on 28 June 2003.

2.  On 1 July 2003, he was released from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group to accept an appointment in the Michigan Army National Guard (MIARNG) in the grade of O-1.  He took his Oaths of Office in the MIARNG on 1 July 2003.

3.  He was promoted to first lieutenant (O-2) effective 28 June 2005.

4.  On 15 January 2007, the applicant was approved for an interstate transfer to the North Carolina Army National Guard (NCARNG).  He took his Oaths of Office on 9 March 2007 and was assigned to Company B, 1st Battalion, 252nd Combined Arms Battalion, Smithfield, North Carolina, as the executive officer on 12 March 2007.

5.  Orders 092-850 were published on 1 April 2008 transferring him to a position vacancy at Joint Forces Headquarters, Raleigh, North Carolina, effective 1 April 2008.

6.  A Federal Recognition Examining Board convened on 24 April 2008 to determine the applicant's qualifications for Federal recognition.  The board found him qualified and recommended that he be promoted the rank of captain (O-3).

7.  On 6 June 2008, Orders 158-804 were published promoting him to grade O-3, effective 24 April 2008.  However, these orders were amended to show his promotion was effective 20 August 2008.

8.  On 22 August 2008, NGB Special Orders Number 218 AR were published awarding the applicant Federal Recognition, effective 20 August 2008, in grade O-3.

9.  On 22 August 2008, the applicant was notified that he was promoted to grade O-3, effective 20 August 2008.

10.  In an advisory opinion, dated 22 June 2009, the Chief, Personnel Division, NGB, recommended disapproval of the applicant's request for the following reasons:

* his promotion was based on a position vacancy
* promotion effective dates on all position vacancy promotions is the date the Secretary of Defense approved and signed the promotion scroll list
* promotion is not based on the date of State Federal Recognition Board
* promotion is not based on the date of the State promotion orders
* in accordance with the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act, effective date of promotion and date of rank for officers promoted under the position vacancy promotion system will be the date the Chief, NGB extends Federal recognition, based on the approved scroll list from the Secretary of Defense
* scroll lists take approximately 90 to 120 days to be approved
* he was assigned to a captain position on 1 April 2008
* he was recommended for promotion by a State Federal Recognition Examination Board on 24 April 2008
* orders were published on 6 June 2008 promoting him to captain effective 24 April 2008
* his Federal recognition packet arrived at NGB-ARP on 6 June 2008
* his name was placed on the scroll and submitted to the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff (ODSC), G-1 for review and routing on 11 June 2008
* the promotion process took 75 days from the time the promotion packet arrived at NGB-ARP
* the promotion process took 141 days from his assignment to the captain position
* the delay between 1 April 2008 and 6 June 2008 was not excessive
* the rest of the process occurred in a timely manner

11.  The applicant submitted a rebuttal to the advisory opinion on 20 August 2009, in which he, in effect, reiterates his previous contentions regarding the length of time it took for his promotion packet to be processed.  He further 



contends that the advisory opinion failed to address his timeliness issues and it does not address the issue of the promise that was made to him and his chain of command regarding the effective date of his promotion to captain.  

12.  National Guard Regulation 600-100, chapter 8 establishes the policies and procedures for promotion of officers in the ARNG.  Essentially, officers serving in a unit where a position vacancy exits may be promoted by the State to fill the position vacancy.  However, until Federal Recognition in the new rank is extended by the NGB, the individual cannot be promoted and paid for the higher rank.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  It is unfortunate that the processing of the promotion packet was administratively delayed due to what appears to have been through no fault of the applicant.

2.  However, the promotion packet did not arrive at NGB-ARP until 6 June 2008 and on 11 June 2008 his name was placed on the scroll list for approval by the Secretary of Defense.  

3.  He was promoted to captain effective 20 August 2008.  Based on the available information this is the earliest date he could have been promoted (the date he was granted Federal recognition).  

4.  The applicant's contentions regarding an agreed upon promotion date and the length of time it took to process his promotion packet has been considered.  However, unless he can provide evidence to show that the Secretary of Defense approved the scroll list on which his name appeared earlier than 20 August 2008, no relief can be granted.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  ___x_____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011713



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011713



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010177

    Original file (20070010177.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Chief, Personnel Division stated that the promotion effective date on all position vacancy promotion systems is the date the Secretary of Defense approved and signed the promotion scroll list, not the date of the State Federal Recognition Board or the State promotion orders. The official went on to state that the CAARNG should have sent the applicant's promotion record to the Mandatory Reserve Component Selection Board in 2004, as the officer was eligible for promotion on 18 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011782

    Original file (20130011782.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, NGB recommended and the State concurred that the applicant was entitled to a vacancy promotion to CPT with a DOR and effective date of 9 January 2013. Based on the delays through no fault of his own, and the scrolls approved by the Secretary of Defense on 9 January 2013, as a matter of equity in this case, his records should be corrected to show he was extended Federal recognition and promoted to CPT in the SCARNG with a DOR and effective date of 9 January 2013 with entitlement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012615

    Original file (20080012615.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 August 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080012615 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, in effect, that he received State of Michigan promotion orders promoting him to the rank of CPT on 21 March 2007. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard records and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending NGB Special Orders Number 211 AR, dated 30 August 2007, to show he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000732

    Original file (20120000732.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is unclear from the official records if the promotion recommendation was staffed to the PAARNG or considered by his state Federal Recognition Board (FRB). On 19 October 2011, by email, an NGB official stated that the State submitted the promotion packet on 15 June 2011. It is unclear from the official records if the promotion recommendation was staffed to the PAARNG or considered by his State FRB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015866

    Original file (20110015866.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The applicant's records show: a. he was appointed in the Georgia Army National Guard (GAARNG) on 19 November 2003; b. he was assigned to lieutenant authorized positions from the date of his appointment to 31 December 2006; c. he was assigned to a captain position as commander, D Company, 2nd Battalion, 121st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006794

    Original file (20090006794.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The advisory official indicated the NGB recommended disapproval of the applicant's request to have his CPT DOR changed from 21 December 2006 to 12 July 2006 because his promotion was based on a position vacancy. This recommendation was based on the promotion regulatory guidance contained in the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA) for position vacancy promotions which provides that the effective date of an ARNG commissioned officer who is promoted in the State under the position...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007974

    Original file (20130007974.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The NGB and state recommend the applicant receive partial administrative relief in that her effective date of promotion and DOR be adjusted to 9 January 2013, the date the Secretary of Defense approved the scroll. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14308(f) states that the effective date of a promotion of a Reserve commissioned officer in the Army who is extended Federal recognition in the next higher grade in the ARNG shall be the date in which such Federal recognition in that grade is so...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017888

    Original file (20090017888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show the effective date and date of rank (DOR) for his promotion to captain (CPT)/pay grade O-3 was 12 September 2008 and payment of all pay and allowances due as a result of this correction. He states he assumed command of Company D, 3rd Battalion, 144th Infantry, on 23 February 2009; however, he was not promoted until 16 September 2009. c. He states it is unjust that he assumed the responsibility of a company commander without being...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010945

    Original file (20080010945.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, adjustment to his promotion effective date and date of rank (DOR) for major (MAJ) from 28 August 2007 to 21 June 2007. The promotion effective date is not the date of appointment into the position or the date of State Federal Recognition Board. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the applicant was promoted to MAJ with an effective date and DOR of 5 July 2007; b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000045

    Original file (20120000045.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DOR should be adjusted due to the State G-1's failure to submit his Federal Recognition 90 days prior to the Army Promotion List (APL) mandatory promotion board. m. On 2 November 2010, the FY 2011 Captain APL Board convened and recommended him for promotion to captain on a published list, dated 3 March 2011. n. Based on law, regulation, and NGB policy, his PRARNG unit should have proceeded with the promotion process when he was selected for promotion by the vacancy promotion board. (5)...