IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 14 October 2009
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090006794
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his captain (CPT) date of rank (DOR) and Federal recognition date be changed from 12 December 2006 to 12 July 2006, and that he be provided all back pay and allowances due as a result.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that unknown administrative delays by the National Guard Bureau (NGB), G-1, delayed his promotion to CPT. He indicates his unit completed and submitted his vacancy packet to the Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) in April 2006; a Federal Recognition Examining Board (FREB) convened on 28 April 2006 and recommended his promotion to CPT; he was transferred to assume a position as Commander, C Battery, 3rd Battalion, 133rd Field Artillery (FA) Regiment effective 1 May 2006; and he signed his Assumption of Command Memorandum on 11 May 2006. The applicant also states that his branch was mistakenly recorded as Air Defense (AD); however, it was corrected and a second FREB convened on 6 July 2006, which recommended he be promoted to CPT on 12 July 2006. He further states that he did not receive Federal recognition for CPT until 21 December 2006. He indicates that as a first lieutenant (1LT) or CPT, he served on active duty from 12 July 2006 to 13 August 2008 in battalion staff level positions normally assigned to officers in the rank of major (MAJ) as both an Executive Officer and Operations Officer.
3. The applicant provides Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) document extracts in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant's record shows that he was initially appointed a second lieutenant (2LT) and he was granted Federal recognition in the New Mexico Army National Guard (NMARNG) on 18 August 2001.
2. On 4 February 2002, NGB Special Orders Number 32 AR again extended Federal recognition to the applicant in the rank of 2LT based on his change of state from the NMARNG to the TXARNG, effective 8 November 2001.
3. The applicant was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant (1LT) and he was extended Federal recognition on 18 August 2003.
4. On 19 April 2006, the TXARNG published Orders Number 109-1027, which show the applicant was released from a Fire Support Officer position and transferred him to a Command position effective 1 May 2006. The TXARNG published Orders Number 123-1063 on 3 May 2006, directing the applicant's branch transfer from Air Defense Artillery (ADA) to FA.
5. Based upon his branch transfer, the applicant was extended Federal Recognition in the rank of 1LT on 3 May 2006 and he assumed command on 11 May 2006.
6. On 12 July 2006, TXARNG published Orders 193-1098, which promoted the applicant to captain, effective 12 July 2006.
7. On 29 December 2006, NGB Special Orders Number 328 AR, extended Federal recognition to the applicant for the purpose of promotion to the rank of CPT, effective 21 December 2006.
8. In connection with the processing of this case, on 19 June 2009, an advisory opinion was obtained from the NGB Chief, Personnel Division. The advisory official indicated the NGB recommended disapproval of the applicant's request to have his CPT DOR changed from 21 December 2006 to 12 July 2006 because his promotion was based on a position vacancy. This recommendation was based on the promotion regulatory guidance contained in the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA) for position vacancy promotions which provides that the effective date of an ARNG commissioned officer who is promoted in the State under the position vacancy system is the date the Chief, NGB extends Federal recognition based on the approved scroll list from the Secretary of Defense.
9. The advisory official further stated that the promotion regulatory guidance states that the promotion effective date is not the date of appointment to the position or the date of the State FREB. Scroll lists take approximately 90 to 120 days to be approved by the Secretary of Defense due to processing and staffing requirements.
10. The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal. On 21 July 2009, the applicant submitted a letter responding to the NGB advisory opinion. In it, he stated that the date between his effective date of promotion to CPT of 13 July 2006 to his CPT DOR of 21 December 2006 is 165 days which exceeds the average 90-120 days by 45 days. He further requests consideration be given the final disposition of his case based on this oversight.
11. National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officers - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) prescribes policies and procedures for the personnel management of ARNG officers. Chapter 8 contains the policies for promotion of ARNG officers other than General Officers and states, in pertinent part, that the promotion of ARNG officers is a function of the State and will be based on efficiency, time in grade, time in commissioned service, demonstrated command and staff ability, military and civilian education, and potential for service in the next higher grade. Except as otherwise provided, officers will be promoted only when an appropriate position vacancy exists in the unit. Paragraph 8-2 stipulates that the effective date of promotion for an ARNG officer who is promoted in the State is the date the Chief, NGB extends Federal Recognition.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contention that his CPT DOR should be changed to 12 July 2006 and that he should be provided all back pay and allowances due as a result was carefully considered. However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim.
2. By law and regulation, the effective date of vacancy promotions in the ARNG is the date Federal recognition is granted by the Chief, NGB. Further, scroll lists take approximately 90 to 120 days to be approved by the Secretary of Defense due to processing and staffing requirements.
3. The evidence of record confirms that although the applicant was assigned to a position authorized the higher grade and the FREB was completed on 12 July 2006, processing was not completed and the Chief, NGB did not extend Federal recognition to the applicant in the grade of CPT until 21 December 2006.
4. Although the time between the FREB was completed and the date Federal recognition was granted by the Chief, NGB exceeded the 120 days it normally takes for scroll lists to be approved, the delay was not extraordinary and did not excessively exceed normal processing times. Therefore, there appears to be no significant error or injustice related to the delay in the applicant being extended Federal recognition, in the rank of CPT, by the Chief, NGB that would cause this Board to substitute its judgment for that of the Chief, NGB, who is granted the vacancy promotion authority by law and regulation.
5. Absent the concurrence of the Chief, NGB or of any compelling evidence of error in the NGB processing of Federal recognition in the applicant's case, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X___ ___X____ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
__________X___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090006794
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090006794
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020955
His packet was submitted in July 2012 with the New Mexico State Recognition Board results, dated 20 July 2012, and State Orders for promotion, dated 26 July 2012. The applicant provides copies of the following: * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board (FREB)) * Orders Number 208-004 * FY 2013 DA Reserve Component Board Schedule * Special Orders (SO) Number 137 AR * two emails * Suspense for Submission of Applications for the Federal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022437
The applicant provides: * Orders 330-1325 (State promotion to CPT) * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Special Orders 306 AR (initial appointment), 43 AR (promotion to 1LT), and 193 AR (promotion to CPT) * U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) promotion to CPT and 1LT memoranda * Orders 174-1003 (promotion to 1LT) * Orders 197-1110 (State appointment orders) * Mobilization and demobilization orders * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Email exchange with Officer Personnel...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013026
The advisory cites National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officers - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions), which states that the effective date of promotion for an ARNG commissioned officer who is promoted in the State is the date the Chief, NGB, extends Federal Recognition, unless otherwise provided by law. The advisory official states that in accordance with the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA), the effective date of promotion and DOR for an officer...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013059
Although she was transferred to a maintenance officer (CPT) position on 1 October 2004, she did not have the 2 years minimum TIG required for promotion consideration to CPT in 2004. On 26 May 2006, the State FREB approved the applicant's promotion to CPT, OD based on position vacancy. The applicant was not entitled to promotion to CPT until she was extended Federal recognition in an approved promotion vacancy promotion.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028471
The official stated the applicant was promoted to captain by the TXARNG on 20 May 2010 per order number 145-1064, dated 25 May 2010. The advisory official also stated the applicant contends that he was eligible for promotion to captain on 22 April 2010. The applicant was not eligible for promotion to captain until 22 April 2010.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017888
The applicant requests correction of his records to show the effective date and date of rank (DOR) for his promotion to captain (CPT)/pay grade O-3 was 12 September 2008 and payment of all pay and allowances due as a result of this correction. He states he assumed command of Company D, 3rd Battalion, 144th Infantry, on 23 February 2009; however, he was not promoted until 16 September 2009. c. He states it is unjust that he assumed the responsibility of a company commander without being...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004162
The applicant provides copies of: * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings Docket Number AR20090007322, dated 5 January 2010 * his promotion orders to MAJ * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Federal recognition orders * two memoranda from the Virgin Islands National Guard (VING) Joint Force Headquarters * an NGB Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board) * his OER's * a memorandum of promotion to LTC by an SSB, dated 2 July 2009 * an NGB...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017880
Army Board for Correction of Military Records, Record of Proceedings, dated 2 November 2006. b. On 26 December 2006, the State of Georgia, Department of Defense, Military Division, Ellenwood, Georgia Army National Guard, published Orders 360-089, amending the applicants promotion service date from 20 January 2005 to 20 January 2004 and his promotion eligibility date as 19 January 2006 instead of 19 January 2007. The promotion effective date is not the date of appointment into the position...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021008
The applicant states he could not submit his promotion packet for CPT until the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) had finalized his DOR to first lieutenant (1LT). Without question, the failure to timely process the applicant's earlier correction for Federal recognition resulted in a delay in the processing of his appointment as a CPT. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State ARNG records of the individual concerned be corrected by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003692
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 September 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090003692 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He further states that under the governing regulatory guidance and statutory guidance contained in the ROPMA, the effective date of an Army National Guard (ARNG) commissioned officer who is promoted in the State under the position vacancy system is the date the Chief, NGB extends Federal Recognition based on the approved scroll list from the Secretary of Defense. ...