Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011483
Original file (20090011483.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  28 January 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090011483


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the narrative reason for separation on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed to "service connected disability."

2.  The applicant states he was discharged for a medical condition which resulted from an injury incurred during active duty.  He states the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has awarded him a disability rating of 50 percent.

3.  The applicant provides:

	a.  a copy of his DD Form 214; and

	b.  documents from the VA awarding him disability.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 January 2007.

2.  A DA Form 4707 (Entrance Physical Standards Board Proceedings), dated 8 August 2007, reveals immediately upon entering active duty, the applicant experienced serious shoulder pain and weakness in both arms when performing physical training.  This was followed by frequent crepitus and then by actual subluxation (dislocation).  The applicant was able to self-reduce the subluxation, but the problem became more frequent and more painful.

3.  The DA Form 4707 further provides that upon arrival at Fort Gordon, GA for military occupational specialty (MOS) training, the applicant sought medical treatment.  It was determined that his condition of hyperlaxity pre-existed his enlistment and that he would require some 12 months of rehabilitation.  Orthopedic surgeons concluded his condition was not compatible with rigorous military training and recommended he be separated.

4.  The applicant's chain of command initiated action to discharge him for failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards under the provisions of paragraph 5-11, chapter 5, Army Regulation 635-200.

5.  On 1 November 2007, the approving authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of paragraph 5-11, Army Regulation 635-200.  He was subsequently honorably discharged on 26 November 2007 after serving 10 months and 9 days on active duty.  

6.  A shoulder subluxation is a temporary, partial dislocation of the shoulder joint. The shoulder is a ball and socket joint.  The ball of the upper arm bone (humerus) is held into the socket (glenoid) of the shoulder blade (scapula) by a group of ligaments.  If an individual has had a previous injury or if shoulder ligaments are naturally loose, he may sublux the shoulder doing simple activities like throwing a ball or putting on a shirt or jacket.

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) sets policies, standards, and procedures to ensure the readiness and competency of the force while providing for the orderly administrative separation of Soldiers for a variety of reasons.  Chapter 5 states Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty may be separated.  Such conditions must be discovered during the first 6 months of active duty.  Such findings will result in an entrance physical standards board.

8.  Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability.  Under the laws governing the Army Physical Disability Evaluation system, Soldiers who sustain or aggravate physically unfitting disabilities must meet several line of duty criteria to be eligible to receive retirement and severance pay benefits.  One of the criteria is that the disability must have been incurred or aggravated while the Soldier was entitled to basic pay or was the proximate cause of performing active duty or inactive duty training.


9.  Title 38, U. S. Code, sections 1110 and 1131, permits the VA to award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in or aggravated by active military service.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant would like his DD Form 214 to indicate he was discharged by reason of a service-connected physical disability.

2.  The applicant entered the Army with a physical predisposition for multi-directional subluxation of both shoulder joints.  During routine physical training, he suffered bilateral subluxations on numerous occasions and ultimately sought medical help. 

3.  The applicant underwent an Entrance Physical Standards Board Proceedings on 18 July 2007.  That board found him unfit for continued service and he was ultimately discharged for a failure to meet physical procurement  standards.

4.  The VA, in accordance with its own policies and regulations, awards compensation solely on the basis that a medical condition exists and that said medical condition reduces or impairs the social or industrial adaptability of the individual concerned.  The VA may also apply its own standards of “reasonable doubt” concerning the service connection of a condition.  Such a decision does not impact on the Army’s determination that a medical condition existed prior to entering service and was not service aggravated.

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011483



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011483



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00656

    Original file (PD 2013 00656.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. At the MEB narrative summary performed on 14 Jan 2005 (8 months prior to separation) she endorsed a painful left shoulder with overhead activities with feelings of dislocations when reaching for a seatbeltor taking items out of the refrigerator.The examination revealed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-00431

    Original file (BC-2006-00431.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 July 2002, the DVA denied his request for service-connection for recurrent anterior instability, left shoulder, because the disability pre- existed service and was not incurred in or aggravated by service. On 6 January 2004, the Board considered the applicant’s request that his RE code be changed. In view of the supporting statement from the applicant’s physician indicating his shoulder has healed and his medical condition changed, the Board changed his RE code to “3K” which can be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085557C070212

    Original file (2003085557C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-11 provides that soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entrance on active duty, active duty for training, or initial entry training, will be separated. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01768

    Original file (PD-2014-01768.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20071002VA -Based on Service Treatment Records(STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Right Shoulder Pain and Instability5099-500310%Right Shoulder Instability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00158

    Original file (PD2009-00158.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA rated CI’s shoulders at 30% combined using a combination of 10% for the left shoulder instability, 10% for the right shoulder instability and 10% for the right shoulder painful scar. He has chronic pain and disability even after surgery on one shoulder, can’t lift over 10 lbs, has limited ROM, painful shoulders and right knee; painful running due to both knee and shoulders (slide in and out of socket); shoulder pain making sleep difficult, and that all were combat wounds and not...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00920

    Original file (PD 2014 00920.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Separation Date: 20050923 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the recurrent right shoulder instability condition, the Board unanimously...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01790

    Original file (PD-2014-01790.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Orthopedic clinic note dated 12 February 2008 noted the CI reported recurrent episodes of subluxation. Full ROM of the right shoulder was recorded in May 2008 during separate PT and orthopedic clinic examinations. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00901

    Original file (PD2012 00901.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although symptoms did improve with medication, a P3 profile due to “sleeping disorder” was recorded on 2 November 2002, limiting the CI to “no driving vehicles, handling ammunition, firing weapons or performing duties requiring concentration or alertness.” The commander’s performance statement letter, dated 14 March 2003,records that the limitation of duties for narcolepsy prohibits assignments in which “sudden incapacitation would be dangerous to self or others.” The narrative summary...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01077

    Original file (PD2011-01077.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    Right Shoulder Condition . While the VA exam performed 6 months after separation demonstrated a shoulder dislocation, “frequent episodes and guarding of all movements” required for the 30% rating under code 5202, was not specified. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00823

    Original file (PD2012-00823.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On the MEB physical exam DD Form 2808, dated 05 November 2001, the examiner recorded “B shoulder subluxation, popping B shoulder, + sulcus sign L>R, N/V intact distally.” In the NARSUM, 4 months prior to separation, the examiner noted “he has minimal pain from this, but pretty much every time he tries to adduct, externally rotate the arms, he dislocates the shoulders. The examiner opined “Bilateral shoulder joint laxity, right greater than left, with history of recurrent, uncomplicated,...