Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009448
Original file (20090009448.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  5 November 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090009448 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and Air Medal (AM).

2.  The applicant states he was assigned to a combat strike force in Vietnam and was in combat continuously from January to April 1968. 

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 17 July 1967.  He was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman), and pay grade E-4 was the highest grade that he held.

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was assigned to A, 2d Battalion, 27th Infantry as a light weapons infantryman from 
19 January to 23 April 1968 during his service in the Republic of Vietnam.  The applicant was in a patient status from 24 April to 3 June 1968, however, it was not combat related.

4.  Available records are void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB or AM by proper authority.

5.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 16 July 1969 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) after completing 2 years of creditable active service.

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS) maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, which is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973, failed to reveal any orders awarding the applicant the CIB or AM.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army's awards policy.  Chapter 8 states in pertinent part that there are three basic requirements for the CIB.  The member must hold and serve in an infantry MOS; must be assigned to a qualifying infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size; and must have been present and participated with his qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces.  It further stipulates that combat service alone is not a sufficient basis to support award of the CIB.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the AM is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service while participating in aerial flight.  This award is primarily intended for personnel on flying status, but may also be awarded to those personnel whose combat duties require them to fly; for example, personnel in the attack elements of units involved in air-land assaults against an armed enemy.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders is required.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  By regulation, in order to support award of the CIB, there must not only be evidence that a member served in an infantry MOS while assigned to an infantry unit, but he must also have been personally present and participated with the qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces.  While the applicant contends he served continuously in combat for a period of time, there is no evidence in the available records and he did not provide sufficient evidence to support that he personally engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces.  Therefore, regrettably, there is insufficient evidence to show he met the eligibility criteria for award of the CIB.

2.  There is also no evidence or orders available to show the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the AM.  Therefore, he is not entitled to this medal.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  _____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009448



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009448



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017420

    Original file (20100017420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013345

    Original file (20090013345.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It allows, in effect, that upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award or presentation of a decoration (or the upgrading of a decoration), either for an individual or a unit, that is not otherwise authorized to be presented or awarded due to limitations established by law or policy for timely submission of a recommendation for such award or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009508

    Original file (20100009508.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Air Medal (AM). There is no evidence he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB or the AM. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not submit any evidence that conclusively shows the helicopter was downed because of enemy action or that he was directly involved in the incident.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002652

    Original file (20080002652.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents that show the applicant was ever awarded, held, or served in an infantry MOS, or that he was awarded the CIB or AM by proper authority while serving in the RVN. The evidence of record also fails to show that the applicant served as a crewmember or non-crewmember on flight status during his tenure of assignment in the RVN, or that he completed the number of air missions necessary to qualify for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023880

    Original file (20100023880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and Air Medal (AM) (6th Award) and with "V" Device. The available evidence of record fails to show the applicant was awarded the CIB. Although the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the AM (5th OLC), there is no evidence of record and he has provided none to show he was awarded the AM (6th Award) and with "V" Device.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065089C070421

    Original file (2001065089C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, this military records be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH), Air Medal (AM), and Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). United States Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for award of the AM. The evidence of record does not show that the applicant was wounded or injured in action or that he was ever awarded the PH and the applicant has failed to provide evidence that supports his claim of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074769C070403

    Original file (2002074769C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in Newark, New Jersey, on 22 August 1966, for a period of 3 years and training as a clerk typist. The regulation outlines the criteria for award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and provides, in pertinent part, that the GCMDL is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. Additionally, there is no evidence in the available records to show that he was recommended for or is entitled to an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005684

    Original file (20110005684.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's official military personnel file (OMPF) contains a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) which shows: * in item 27 (Military Education) – no entry * in item 28 (Specialized Training) – * Army Training Program (ATP) 21-114 [Basic Combat Training] * Code of Conduct * Basic Airborne Course * Chemical/Biological/Radiological (CBR) training * in item 38 (Record of Assignments) – conduct and efficiency ratings of "excellent" * in item 40 (Wounds) – gunshot wound right arm 8...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011827

    Original file (20090011827 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While the applicant was an infantryman serving as a rifleman, there is no evidence that he actually engaged the enemy in combat. As such, there is insufficient evidence in which to award the applicant the CIB. There is no evidence to show that the applicant participated in aerial combat assaults and there is no evidence that he participated in at least 25 such assault missions, the minimum criteria for award of the AM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075102C070403

    Original file (2002075102C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and the Air Medal (AM).