Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065089C070421
Original file (2001065089C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 19 March 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001065089


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. William Blakely Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Shirley L. Powell Chairperson
Mr. Stanley Kelley Member
Mr. Elzey J. Arledge, Jr. Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, this military records be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH), Air Medal (AM), and Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

3. The applicant states, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) does not include the PH, AM, and CIB in the list of authorized awards in
item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized).

4. The applicant’s military records show that he entered the Army on
28 February 1968, and that he continuously served on active duty for 2 years,
7 months, and 10 days until 8 October 1970, when he was honorably separated in the rank of specialist five/E-5. His awards include the Bronze Star Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Good Conduct Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, and Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with 60 Device.

5. Neither his DD Form 214, nor his Enlisted Qualification Record (DA From 20) reflect entitlement to the PH, AM, or CIB. His DA Form 20 does show he served in the RVN, in military occupational specialty (MOS) 63A (Rigger Crewman), with B Company, 7th Support Battalion, 199th Light Infantry Brigade, from 25 October 1969 to 24 October 1970. Item 40 (Wounds) contains no entry, which would indicate he was never wounded or injured in action during his active duty tenure.

6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Air Medal (AM) is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service while participating in aerial flight. This award is primarily intended for personnel on flying status, but may also be awarded to those personnel whose combat duties require them to fly; for example, personnel in the attack elements of units involved in air-land assaults against an armed enemy. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders is required.


8. United States Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for award of the AM. It established that passenger personnel who did not participate in an air assault were not eligible for the award based upon sustained operations. It defined terms and provided guidelines for the award based upon the number and types of missions or hours. Twenty-five Category I missions (air assault and equally dangerous missions) and accrual of a minimum of 25 hours of flight time while engaged in Category I missions was the standard established for which sustained operations were deemed worthy of recognition by an award of the AM. However, the regulation was clear that these guidelines were considered only a departure point. Nothing created an entitlement to the award and there were no provisions for making the award simply because an aircraft was struck by enemy fire.

9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) is awarded to infantry personnel, with an infantry MOS, who served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size. The Awards Branch of the Total Army Personnel Command has advised, in similar cases, that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

10. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) indicates that the applicant’s unit, B Company,
7th Support Battalion, 199th Light Infantry Brigade, was cited for the award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation Badge and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation during his tenure of assignment.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that his military records should be corrected to show he earned the PH, AM, and CIB, but it finds these claims lack merit.

2. The evidence of record does not show that the applicant was wounded or injured in action or that he was ever awarded the PH and the applicant has failed to provide evidence that supports his claim of entitlement to the PH. In addition, there is no evidence to show that he performed infantry duties, in an infantry MOS, while assigned and personally present under hostile fire with a qualifying unit that was actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy. Therefore, the Board finds insufficient evidence to support awarding him the PH or the CIB.


3. Further, the evidence of record fails to show that the applicant satisfied the regulatory criteria necessary to be awarded the AM. Therefore, lacking independent evidence to the contrary, the Board finds no evidentiary basis to support granting this requested relief.

4. The evidence of record does show that the applicant’s unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation Badge and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation during his tenure of assignment. Therefore, the Board concludes it would be appropriate to add these awards to his record at this time.

5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation Badge and Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation; and by providing him a corrected separation document that reflects these awards.

2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

__SLP__ __SK __ __EJA___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  __Shirley L. Powell__
                  CHAIRPERSON    



INDEX

CASE ID AR2001065089
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/03/19
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002652

    Original file (20080002652.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents that show the applicant was ever awarded, held, or served in an infantry MOS, or that he was awarded the CIB or AM by proper authority while serving in the RVN. The evidence of record also fails to show that the applicant served as a crewmember or non-crewmember on flight status during his tenure of assignment in the RVN, or that he completed the number of air missions necessary to qualify for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002617

    Original file (20110002617.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for award of the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 by: a. deleting the current VSM and ARCOM entries and b. adding the Vietnam Service Medal with 4 bronze service stars, Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013097

    Original file (20110013097.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any orders or other documents indicating he was awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. In order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that it required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011575C070208

    Original file (20040011575C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant also claims his unit was awarded the RVNGC with Palm Unit Citation, and that he is entitled to the AGCM. However, there are no orders, flight records, or other evidence on file in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) that confirms he is entitled to this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him Army Good Conduct Medal; by showing his entitlement to the Air Medal with Numeral...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027655

    Original file (20100027655.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show, in effect, he: a. completed the Infantry Leaders Course Phase I and II; b. was authorized award of the Purple Heart (PH), Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), Air Medal (AM), Bronze Star Medal (BSM), and Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; and c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005845

    Original file (20090005845.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the Purple Heart (PH), Air Medal (AM), Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, and all other awards to which he is entitled be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). There is no evidence that the applicant was awarded the AM; therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his record to show this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059422C070421

    Original file (2001059422C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    United States Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided, in pertinent part, guidelines for award of the Air Medal (AM). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal (VCM). The Government of Vietnam awarded this medal to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014418

    Original file (20080014418.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that it required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020119

    Original file (20100020119.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM and to correct his records to reflect this award. His records show he participated in three campaigns while serving in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 27 September 1966 through 26 September 1968, b. deleting the VSM from item 24 of his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040006470C070208

    Original file (20040006470C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 June 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040006470 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show his entitlement to a 2nd award of the Purple Heart (PH) and to a 5th award of the Air Medal (AM). As a result, the Board recommends that all...