Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011827
Original file (20090011827 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  12 January 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090011827 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and the Air Medal (AM).

2.  The applicant states that he served in the jungle with the 1st Cavalry Division and participated in numerous firefights with the enemy.  He also participated in several combat assaults by air including one at night on a "hot" landing zone.

3.  The applicant does not provide any additional documents.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 9 July 1968, was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (light weapons infantryman), and was promoted to pay grade E-4.

3.  The applicant served in Vietnam from 9 December 1968 to 10 February 1970. 
While assigned to Vietnam, he served as a rifleman and team leader with units under the 1st Cavalry Division.

4.  On 10 February 1970, the applicant was honorably released from active duty.

5.  The applicant's records do not contain any orders awarding him the AM or CIB, there are no documents recording flight hours, and there are no documents which show that the applicant actually engaged the enemy.

6.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for award of the AM.  This regulation stated that individuals who travel by aircraft from point to point for the purpose of participating in combat assaults are eligible for the award of the AM for achievement after completion of 25 assault missions.  For personnel transported by aircraft, a combat assault mission is defined as a mission where friendly troops conduct the initial landings into a hostile area for the purpose of conducting combat or combat support operations.  A passenger may receive credit for one mission for each assault landing completed.  This regulation continued by stating that passenger personnel who did not participate in an air assault were not eligible for the award based upon sustained operations.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 provides that during the Vietnam era, the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the applicant was an infantryman serving as a rifleman, there is no evidence that he actually engaged the enemy in combat.  As such, there is insufficient evidence in which to award the applicant the CIB.

2.  There is no evidence to show that the applicant participated in aerial combat assaults and there is no evidence that he participated in at least 25 such assault missions, the minimum criteria for award of the AM.  As such, there is insufficient evidence in which to award him the AM.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011827



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090011827



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017852

    Original file (20110017852.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    CIB orders are on file in the applicant's record and therefore the CIB should be added to his DD Form 214. The applicant's record is void of AM orders or other documentation indicating it was ever recommended or awarded; however, by regulation, eligibility for the AM is established for members whose combat duties require them to fly, which includes those in the attack elements of units involved in air-land assaults against an armed enemy and those directly involved in airborne command and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019778

    Original file (20110019778.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) governed the military awards program in Vietnam during the Vietnam War. In light of his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (1st Award) based on completion of a qualifying period of active Federal service from 28 September 1967 to 12 March 1969 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010183

    Original file (20100010183.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the following awards: * Combat Infantryman Badge * Purple Heart * Arrowhead Device for the Vietnam Service Medal based on participation in an amphibious assault in conjunction with the 1st Marine Division during the Spring of 1968 * Joint Service Commendation Medal based on combat duty performed with the 1st Marine Division during the Tet Counteroffensive campaign in 1968 2. The applicant states the following: * He was wounded in combat as an infantry squad member *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007687

    Original file (20080007687.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant also requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to show he was “put in for promotion to E6,” that he was “put in” for the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and that he is entitled to unit awards. However, even though the applicant may have participated in additional flights after the award of the 23rd OLC to his AM, there is no evidence or indication that he had sufficient assault missions to warrant any additional awards of the AM. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002617

    Original file (20110002617.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for award of the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 by: a. deleting the current VSM and ARCOM entries and b. adding the Vietnam Service Medal with 4 bronze service stars, Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055299C070420

    Original file (2001055299C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he served with Company B, 2d Battalion, 8 th Cavalry (2/8 th Cavalry) in Vietnam, a highly-involved combat unit. In pertinent part, it states that a soldier may wear a unit award permanently if the individual was assigned to and present for duty with the unit any time during the period cited or who was attached by competent orders to and present for duty with the unit during the entire period or for at least 30 consecutive days of the period cited. A soldier may...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065089C070421

    Original file (2001065089C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, this military records be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH), Air Medal (AM), and Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). United States Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for award of the AM. The evidence of record does not show that the applicant was wounded or injured in action or that he was ever awarded the PH and the applicant has failed to provide evidence that supports his claim of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006800

    Original file (20090006800.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that his 25 February 1969 DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected by adding the Silver Star (SS), Air Medals (AMs), Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and any other earned awards and decorations. In this case, the evidence of record shows the applicant was not awarded MOS 11B until 29 July 1966.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018553

    Original file (20070018553.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show the award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his records to show the award of the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the awards of the CIB, Army Good Conduct Medal first award for the period 4 February 1969 to 3 February 1971, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071603C070402

    Original file (2002071603C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he attended Pathfinder Class 1-78, that an earlier DD Form 214 included his CIB, and that other members of his company received the Air Medal but he did not. There is no evidence of record, no USARV Form 131 on the applicant is available, and he has submitted no evidence to show he was eligible for award of the Air Medal. The applicant’s DA Form 2-1 shows he completed HALO training; however, his DA Form 1307 is not available and he has not submitted a course...