Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014356
Original file (20110014356.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  18 August 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110014356 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of the portion of his previous application pertaining to award of the Purple Heart.

2.  He states his record should reflect that an explosion in the course of hostile action at Moc Hoa, Ken Tuong Province, Vietnam, during the Tet Offensive caused an injury to his right eye.  The injury should have led to award of the Purple Heart.

3.  He provides:

* a Standard Form (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination)
* an SF 89 (Report of Medical History)
* a Veterans Administration (VA) rating decision, dated 1 September 1970
* his unsworn/undated Affidavit

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number 76-7281, on 18 May 1977.

2.  The applicant submitted a new argument which was not previously reviewed by the ABCMR; therefore, it is considered new evidence and as such warrants consideration by the Board.
3.  Following a period of enlisted service in the Regular Army, on 5 December 1966, the applicant entered active duty as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army.  He was honorably released from active duty 4 December 1968 after completing 4 years, 3 months, and 4 days of total active service.

4.  Item 18 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) shows he was assigned for duty in Vietnam with the 149th Military Intelligence Group and the U.S. Military Assistance Command (MACV) from 7 September 1967 to 17 August 1968.

5.  His record is void of documentation showing he was awarded the Purple Heart.

6.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Awards and Decorations Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

7.  His name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty listing.

8.  His complete service medical record is not available to the Board for review.  The Standard Forms (SF) 88 and 89 he provides were completed on 2 December 1968 during his separation processing.

	a.  Next to item 33 (Have you ever had any illness or injury other than those already noted?) the SF 88 shows the entry "Fragment in eye, mortar explosion, S. Vietnam, 1968."  The information in this portion of the form was provided by the applicant.

	b.  Item 74 (Summary of Defects and Diagnoses) of the SF 89 shows the entry "Has fragment in sclera of eye -- not seen today."  Item 75 (Recommendations - Further Specialist Examinations Indicated) shows the entry "Rec:  eye consult ref: removal of foreign body."

9.  The VA rating decision he provides shows he was given a 0 percent (%) disability rating percentage for a right eye condition and a laceration on the head.

10.  The affidavit he provides was prepared in 1976 and shows he is the affiant.  He stated, in pertinent part:

On February 2, 1968, in an attack on B-41 during the Tet Offensive a hostile mortar explosion caused either a stone or metal fragment to [lodge] in my eye.  Although a report and recommendation was supposedly made, it apparently never reached MACV.…I was advised by doctors that the fragment would best be left alone since it does not impair my vision in any way.

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available documentation shows the applicant had a fragment in his eye.  Unfortunately, the source of the fragment is not recorded in the available records other than by statements and information he provided.

2.  While the available record shows no apparent reason to doubt his affidavit or the information on the SF 88 prepared during his separation processing, these documents alone do not constitute the substantiating evidence required by regulation for award of the Purple Heart.

3.  In the absence of official documentation confirming the cause of his eye injury, the medical treatment he received, and that the treatment he received was made a matter of official record, there is an insufficient basis for awarding him a Purple Heart or correcting his record to show the Purple Heart.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION
 
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number 76-7281, dated 18 May 1977.



      ____________x___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014356



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110014356



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000448

    Original file (20120000448.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the: * Purple Heart * Combat Infantryman Badge 2. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show award of the Purple Heart or the Combat Infantryman Badge. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant has not provided evidence that shows he participated in active ground combat as an infantryman.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005643

    Original file (20130005643.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Neither of these forms show any evidence indicating he had been wounded while serving in Vietnam. His Army Military Human Resources Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), does not contain any documentation indicating he was wounded in action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. He provides a USARV Form 130-R that shows: * the report was submitted by a chief warrant officer two at 1930 hours on 24 October 1968 * on 24 October 1968, the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010688

    Original file (20080010688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214, dated 18 April 1969, shows he was awarded the Purple Heart for this wound. The available evidence to include the documents the applicant provided are insufficient to support award of a second Purple Heart. To receive a second award of the Purple Heart, the applicant must show that he was wounded a second time as a result of hostile action, that the wound was treated and the treatment was documented.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001556

    Original file (20150001556.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant stated in his previous application: a. His records contain: a. He described these injuries as "superficial" and stated he believed the injuries may have been cause by shrapnel from the explosion.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016275

    Original file (20140016275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of the following: * two Standard Forms (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination) * two SFs 89 (Report of Medical History) * medical history * International Certificates of Vaccination * five SFs 600 (Health Record – Chronological Record of Medical Care) * SF 539 (Clinical Record – Abbreviated Clinical Record) * dental record * letter of commendation * SF 602 (Health Record – Dental Clinic) * DA Form 3082-R (Statement of Medical Condition) * DD Form 214 (Armed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011079

    Original file (20110011079.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides for award of the Purple Heart to a member of the Armed Force or any civilian national of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with one of the U.S. Armed Services after 5 April 1917, has been wounded or killed, or who has died or may die after being wounded in any action against an enemy of the U.S. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007048

    Original file (20120007048.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award. There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Although contemporaneous medical evidence (his SF 88, dated 22 May 1969) states he had mixed hearing loss and he was exposed to explosions in Vietnam, it does not mention any injuries or wounds...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003302

    Original file (20150003302.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * he was wounded by shrapnel during his service in Vietnam * he feels he should have received the Purple Heart at the time * his efforts to receive this award have been unsuccessful thus far * his service medical record should show treatment 3. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for a shrapnel wound incurred while he served in Vietnam. Should the applicant be able to obtain additional evidence (such as unit reports or other official documents...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010020

    Original file (20110010020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. Neither form lists any injury or medical treatment he received while on active duty. _______ _ __X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005398

    Original file (20070005398.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that while he was serving in the Republic of Vietnam, he sustained and was treated for a fragment wound in February 1969. The applicant provided copies of the following documentations in support of his application: a. Self-authored letter responding to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) denial letter dated 4 April 2007 of his request for award of the Purple Heart dated 25 August 2006. b. However, the original Board consideration of...