Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009180
Original file (20090009180.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  11 March 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090009180 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to reflect in block 17c (Date of Entry) that he entered active duty on 2 July 1962.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects that he entered active duty on 23 July 1970 and that it should reflect 2 July 1962, the date he entered the United States Military Academy (USMA) at West Point and remained there until he was commissioned as a second lieutenant.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214; pages from 38 USC (Title 38, U.S. Code which outlines the role of Veterans’ Benefits in the United States Code) Section 101; and 38 CFR (Code of Federal Regulation - Veterans) Section 3.6 defining active duty for service academy cadets.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame 


provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant entered the USMA on 2 July 1962 and graduated on 7 June 1966.  He was commissioned with a medical waiver for hearing loss as a Regular Army (RA) second lieutenant on 8 June 1966 and served on active duty as a military intelligence officer until he permanently retired in the rank of captain by reason of physical disability (40% hearing loss) on 23 July 1970.

3.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his retirement reflects he entered active duty on 8 June 1966 and that he was retired on 23 July 1970, for a total of 4 years, 1 month, and 16 days of total active service.

4.  The Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation (DODFMR), volume 7, chapter 1, paragraph 0101 prescribes service creditable for pay purposes.  It states that service as a cadet at a military service academy is always creditable service for an enlisted member.  Table 1-1 must be used to determine whether such service is creditable for commissioned and warrant officers.  Table 1-1 states that when a member currently serving as an officer has had service as a cadet in any of the military service academies to which he was appointed after 25 June 1956 and he held no concurrent enlisted and/or Reserve status or had an enlistment contract or period of obligated service that was not terminated, then the period involved was not creditable.

5.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 971(a) states that the period of service under enlistment or period of obligated service while also performing service as a cadet may not be counted in computing, for any purpose, the length of service of an officer of an armed force.  Section 971(b) states that in computing length of service for any purpose, service as a cadet or midshipman may not be credited to any commissioned officer.

6.  Title 38, U.S. Code outlines the role of Veterans’ Benefits in the United States Code.  The Code of Federal Regulations, CFR Title 38, Pensions, Bonuses and Veterans’ Relief, outlines the regulations pertaining to bonuses and veterans’ support.  CFR 38 is the codification of the permanent rules published in the Federal Register and is updated once a year.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect that he entered active duty on 2 July 1962 when he entered the USMA has been noted and found to lack merit.

2.  In accordance with the applicable laws and regulations in effect at the time the applicant served, active duty service credit was not authorized for commissioned officers.  Accordingly, his DD Form 214 was properly prepared.

3.  The applicant’s contention that the provisions of Title 38, U.S. Code allow him active duty service credit for his time at the USMA has also been noted.  However, the applicant served under Title 10, U.S. Code and the rules that apply under the title in which he served must be applied.

4.  The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) operates under its own policies and regulations and assigns benefits as it sees fit.  Accordingly, the fact that the VA may credit individuals for service at the USMA does not necessarily demonstrate an error or injustice on the part of the Army.

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  Therefore, in view of all of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 



are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X___________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009180



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090009180



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071761C070403

    Original file (2002071761C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Further, that service as a cadet at the USMA under an appointment accepted after 25 June 1956 is not creditable service. Therefore, the Board finds the 3 rd and 4 th year of the applicant’s service as a cadet at the USMA cannot be legally credited as time in service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022557

    Original file (20100022557.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the length of service her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be recalculated to include the time he spent as a cadet at the U.S. Military Academy (USMA). In this section, the term "service as a cadet or midshipman" means service as a cadet at the USMA, U.S. Air Force Academy, or U.S. Coast Guard Academy; or service as a midshipman at the U.S. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 971(b)(2), in effect at the time, stated that no commissioned officer of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001519

    Original file (20130001519.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show he completed Air Assault School during the period he was a cadet. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The evidence of record shows the applicant entered USMA as a cadet on 28 June 1989 and graduated on 29 May 1993.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001028C070206

    Original file (20050001028C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 28 June 1969; his DA Form 71 (Oath of Office – Military Personnel); a DAPC-PS Form 143 (Computation of Officer's Service); a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) dated 13 September 1999; an enlistment contract dated 29 June 1966; his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record); his DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record); a DA Form 7301-R (Officer Service Computation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001028C070206

    Original file (20050001028C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 28 June 1969; his DA Form 71 (Oath of Office – Military Personnel); a DAPC-PS Form 143 (Computation of Officer's Service); a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) dated 13 September 1999; an enlistment contract dated 29 June 1966; his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record); his DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record); a DA Form 7301-R (Officer Service Computation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000688

    Original file (20100000688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends that his request should be reconsidered in that his service at the USMA was active duty service authorized for inclusion in item 12c of his DD Form 214 because the U.S. Code states that the RA consists of persons whose continuous service on active duty in both peace and war includes cadets of the USMA. The evidence of record shows that: a. the U.S. Code provides that service as a cadet or midshipman may not be credited to any commissioned officer of the Army; b. the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006417C070206

    Original file (20050006417C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his time in service for pay and retirement purposes be recalculated to include the time he spent as a cadet at the U. S. Military Academy (USMA). It states service as a cadet at a military service academy is always creditable service for an enlisted member. If the circumstances in those "precedent" cases had been similar to the applicant's (i.e., enlisted persons who attended the USMA during their initial enlistment, graduated from the USMA, served only...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019479

    Original file (20140019479.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests her time spent at the United States Military Academy (USMA) be added to her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 16 October 2001. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * transcripts from the USMA CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-5 provides for entries on the DD Form 214 for a Soldier who is released in a cadet status prior to graduating from the USMA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000558

    Original file (20060000558.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected and he receive service credit and retirement points for his period of service as a cadet at the United States Military Academy (USMA). A 13 December 1985 DA Form 1506 (Statement of Service - For Computation of Length of Service for Pay Purposes) indicates the applicant had 13 days credit for service under DEP; 1 year, 5 months, and 7 days active duty enlisted service; 3 years, 10 months, and 21 days as an USMA cadet; and that he had been...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03318

    Original file (BC-2005-03318.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03318 INDEX CODE: 110.01 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 MAY 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, dated 29 Feb 96, Block 12a, Date Entered Active Duty (AD) should reflect 25 Jun 79, rather than 1...