Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019479
Original file (20140019479.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 June 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140019479 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests her time spent at the United States Military Academy (USMA) be added to her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 16 October 2001.

2.  The applicant states she understands her USMA time is allowed to be credited to her U.S. Government civilian retirement, but it must be reflected on her DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* transcripts from the USMA

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Her transcripts show she entered the USMA on 29 June 1992 and she graduated on 1 June 1996 with a Bachelor of Science Degree.  On 1 June 1996, she was commissioned a second lieutenant in the Regular Army.

3.  On 16 October 2001, she was honorably discharged.  She completed 5 years, 4 months, and 16 days of net active service this period.  Her DD Form 214 contains no entries showing her attendance at and graduation from the USMA.

4.  On 11 March 2002, she was commissioned a captain in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  On 13 October 2004, she was discharged from the USAR.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), then in effect, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It also established standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.

	a.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of all current active, prior active, and prior inactive duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

	b.  Paragraph 2-1(f) stated a DD Form 214 was prepared for USMA cadets who failed to graduate.

	c.  Paragraph 2-4h(18)(p) provided for an entry in item 18 (Remarks) for a Soldier who had a cadet status at the time of release to show the dates he/she served as a USMA cadet.

6.  Department of Defense (DOD) 7000.14, Financial Management Regulation (FMR), Volume 7A (Military Pay Policy and Procedures - Active Duty and Reserve Pay), Chapter 1 (Basic Pay), paragraph 010201 (Service which is Creditable) details the computation of the pay entry base date and shows that:

	a.  Subparagraph D (Other Creditable Service with restrictions noted below and in subparagraph 010102.A) states "Service as a cadet or midshipman at a military academy is always creditable service for an enlisted member who is not commissioned and reverts back to his/her enlisted status to complete their enlistment contract. See Table 1-1 to determine whether such service is creditable for commissioned and warrant officers."
	b.  Table 1-1 shows when a member currently serving as an officer has had service as a cadet or midshipman in any of the military academies to which appointed and member held no concurrent enlisted and/or Reserve status, then the period involved is not creditable.

7.  Title 10, United States Code (USC), section 971 (Service credit: officer may not count service performed while serving as cadet or midshipman), provides the following:

	a.  Subsection (b) (Prohibition on Counting Service as a Cadet or Midshipman) states that in computing length of service for any purpose, service as a cadet or midshipman may not be credited to any of the following officers: 

		(1)  An officer of the Navy or Marine Corps 

		(2)  A commissioned officer of the Army or Air Force 

		(3)  An officer of the Coast Guard 

		(4)  An officer in the Commissioned Corps of the Public Health Service 

	b.  Subsection (c) (Service as a Cadet or Midshipman Defined) states the term “service as a cadet or midshipman” means: 

		(1)  service as a cadet at the United States Military Academy, United States Air Force Academy, or United States Coast Guard Academy; or 

		(2)  service as a midshipman at the United States Naval Academy. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  She contends her time at the USMA should be included on her DD Form 214.

2.  DOD 7000.14 and Title 10, USC, section 971 state that service as a USMA cadet is not creditable for service for any purpose in a commissioned officer status.

3.  Army Regulation 635-5 provides for entries on the DD Form 214 for a Soldier who is released in a cadet status prior to graduating from the USMA.

4.  The applicant graduated from the USMA and was commissioned a second lieutenant in the Regular Army.  Her service as a USMA cadet is not creditable service for any purpose.  There are no provisions for additional entries on her 
DD Form 214.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140019479





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140019479



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000688

    Original file (20100000688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends that his request should be reconsidered in that his service at the USMA was active duty service authorized for inclusion in item 12c of his DD Form 214 because the U.S. Code states that the RA consists of persons whose continuous service on active duty in both peace and war includes cadets of the USMA. The evidence of record shows that: a. the U.S. Code provides that service as a cadet or midshipman may not be credited to any commissioned officer of the Army; b. the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022557

    Original file (20100022557.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the length of service her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be recalculated to include the time he spent as a cadet at the U.S. Military Academy (USMA). In this section, the term "service as a cadet or midshipman" means service as a cadet at the USMA, U.S. Air Force Academy, or U.S. Coast Guard Academy; or service as a midshipman at the U.S. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 971(b)(2), in effect at the time, stated that no commissioned officer of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001028C070206

    Original file (20050001028C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 28 June 1969; his DA Form 71 (Oath of Office – Military Personnel); a DAPC-PS Form 143 (Computation of Officer's Service); a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) dated 13 September 1999; an enlistment contract dated 29 June 1966; his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record); his DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record); a DA Form 7301-R (Officer Service Computation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001028C070206

    Original file (20050001028C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 28 June 1969; his DA Form 71 (Oath of Office – Military Personnel); a DAPC-PS Form 143 (Computation of Officer's Service); a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) dated 13 September 1999; an enlistment contract dated 29 June 1966; his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record); his DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record); a DA Form 7301-R (Officer Service Computation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000558

    Original file (20060000558.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected and he receive service credit and retirement points for his period of service as a cadet at the United States Military Academy (USMA). A 13 December 1985 DA Form 1506 (Statement of Service - For Computation of Length of Service for Pay Purposes) indicates the applicant had 13 days credit for service under DEP; 1 year, 5 months, and 7 days active duty enlisted service; 3 years, 10 months, and 21 days as an USMA cadet; and that he had been...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071761C070403

    Original file (2002071761C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Further, that service as a cadet at the USMA under an appointment accepted after 25 June 1956 is not creditable service. Therefore, the Board finds the 3 rd and 4 th year of the applicant’s service as a cadet at the USMA cannot be legally credited as time in service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001519

    Original file (20130001519.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show he completed Air Assault School during the period he was a cadet. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The evidence of record shows the applicant entered USMA as a cadet on 28 June 1989 and graduated on 29 May 1993.

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2010-197

    Original file (2010-197.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD 214 shows that he had 2 years, 1 month, and 17 days of total active service, with a note that the service “includes midshipman service from 30 Jun 69 to 16 Aug 71.” Subsequently, on June 20, 1974, the applicant was discharged from his enlisted status to accept a Naval Reserve commission. However, the alleged error should have been discovered when he received his April 24, 1998 retirement points statement because it shows that he was not given credit for his time at the Naval Academy. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006417C070206

    Original file (20050006417C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his time in service for pay and retirement purposes be recalculated to include the time he spent as a cadet at the U. S. Military Academy (USMA). It states service as a cadet at a military service academy is always creditable service for an enlisted member. If the circumstances in those "precedent" cases had been similar to the applicant's (i.e., enlisted persons who attended the USMA during their initial enlistment, graduated from the USMA, served only...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019886

    Original file (20130019886.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It was determined that he was entitled to retirement as an officer, retirement orders as a MAJ were published, and the applicant was granted retirement pay based on 36 years of service. On 20 September 2012, the applicant requested that HRC retroactively credit him with 1,435 additional retirement points for the time he served on active duty as a midshipman/cadet at a service academy. On 10 January 2013, the applicant requested retroactive credit for his service in the Navy Academy.