IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 8 October 2009
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090008443
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states that he was wounded in June 1969 in the Republic of Vietnam. He adds that he was assigned to the 4th Infantry Division in the central highlands of Vietnam, nearly 40 kilometers north of Pleiku. His unit was camped out overnight and he was on perimeter duty when he and his squad received
.50 caliber machinegun fire that injured several members including himself. He was wounded due to heat flash and shrapnel to the left side of his face and head. He also suffered the loss of hearing in his left ear. He was subsequently transported to Pleiku where medical personnel removed the shrapnel and treated his ear. He went back and forth to the hospital several times and was ultimately awarded the Purple Heart on 1 September 1969.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 12 January 1970; a copy of a certificate, dated 1 January 1970, showing award of the Army Commendation Medal; and a copy of a certificate, dated 31 March 1969, showing award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, in support of his request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 6 March 1968. He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman). He was honorably released from active duty in the rank/grade of staff sergeant/E-6 on 12 January 1970 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) for completion of his Reserve obligation.
3. The applicants records show he served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about 12 January 1969 to on or about 11 January 1970. He was assigned to Company A, 2nd Battalion, 8th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division.
4. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicants DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, and two overseas service bars. Item 24 does not show award of the Purple Heart.
5. Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicants DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) contains no entry.
6. The applicant's name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster and there are no general orders in his records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart.
7. During the processing of this case, a member of the Boards staff reviewed the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, which is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973. This review failed to reveal any Purple Heart orders on file for the applicant.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends that he should be awarded the Purple Heart.
2. The Purple Heart differs from all other decorations in that an individual is not "recommended" for the decoration; rather an individual is entitled to it upon meeting a specific criteria. When contemplating an award of this decoration, the key issue that must be taken into consideration is the degree to which the enemy caused the injury. The fact that a proposed recipient was participating in direct or indirect combat operations is a necessary prerequisite, but it is not the sole justification for the Purple Heart.
3. There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart; there is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows he was wounded, or injured as a result of hostile action, or treated for such wounds; and his name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster. In the absence of documentation that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base adding of the Purple Heart to his DD Form 214.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____x____ ____x____ _____x___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ x_______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090008443
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090008443
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012969
A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence he was authorized or awarded the Purple Heart. On 12 March 2002, the applicant submitted a DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record) to the ABCMR requesting award of the Purple Heart. The medical records the applicant provides show he was initially seen by medical personnel on 21 November 1969 for a foreign body in the lower third of his left leg.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028067
He (the witness) received the Purple Heart along with many others who were wounded. The applicant's service in Vietnam and the witness statements he submitted were considered. Again, notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds and the treatment was made a matter of official record there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017690
He was treated for his shrapnel wound and other injuries and was released with his medical records to his unit. In this case, the applicant's name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 does not reflect a combat wound, his record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, and there is no conclusive evidence in his service personnel records that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds. There is no...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020541
There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. His available service medical records show he listed a shrapnel wound in December 1969 and the military medical doctor found evidence of a scar on his right forearm. In the absence of orders or other additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016507
Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show a combat wound and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this form does not show award of the Purple Heart. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record: a. Notwithstanding his sincerity as well as that of his buddies, in the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011159
The applicant's military service records contain an SF 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 16 November 1971, which was completed by the attending physician at the time of the applicants medical examination prior to his release from active duty. There is no evidence in the applicants military service records that shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action; his DA Form 20 does not show an entry in Item 40 (Wounds) or list the Purple Heart in Item 41...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004811
He provided the following documents: a. a personal letter, dated May 1986, in which he stated he was "put in" for a Purple Heart and he stated a piece of metal shrapnel hit him in the back. Unfortunately, his memory does not recall particular dates and details; however, he did, for a number days, clean and dress an infected wound to the applicant's lower back while they served in M Platoon, Company A performing combat duties. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004137
The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Purple Heart. The applicant claims, in effect, that his commander was to recommend him for award of the Purple Heart for his injury and correct his records to show this award; however, it is not shown on his DD Form 214. There is no evidence, and the applicant has provided none, to show that he was recommended for the Purple Heart by his commander.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002968
A review of the applicants military personnel records revealed that there are no orders in the applicants records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. This Army regulation, in pertinent part, states that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. There is no evidence in the applicants military personnel records that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action; his DA Form 20 does not list the Purple Heart in item 41; the applicant's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017301
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. His record shows he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal after his DD Form 214 released him from active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the...