IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE:
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080004137
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states, in effect, he was injured in Vietnam, was told by his commander to go the CAMU (Cameron Army Medical Unit) from NAMCAM (sic his parent unit) to be treated for jungle rot (fungus) and shrapnel. While being treated for jungle rot, shrapnel was removed. His commander was to order the Purple Heart for his injury and records. However, his Purple Heart is not shown on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).
3. He adds that the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Purple Heart would benefit him greatly for his VA (Department of Veterans Affairs) benefits being sought due to his PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) problems which are being assessed at the Knoxville Veterans Center.
4. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 in support of his request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's record shows he was inducted on 7 February 1968. He was trained as a Light Weapons Infantryman, in military occupational specialty (MOS), 11B. He was promoted to specialist four (SP4)/E-4 effective 11 March 1969.
3. The applicant served in Vietnam from 21 August 1969 to 27 January 1970. He served until he was honorably released from active duty on 28 January 1970.
4. The applicants DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal; the Vietnam Service Medal; and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. His DD Form 214 does not show any additional awards.
5. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show an entry in item 40 (Wounds) and the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge are also not shown as an authorized award in item 41 (Awards and Decorations).
6. The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster for a wound received as a result of hostile action.
7. The ADCARS (Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System) failed to show that orders were published awarding the applicant the Purple Heart.
8. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), item 38 (Record of Assignments), shows he served as a security guard, in MOS 11B1O, with DMAC (Delta Military Assistant Command), USA Advisory Group, USAMACV (Military Assistance Command, Vietnam), in Vietnam.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the CIB is awarded to infantry officers, and to enlisted and warrant officer personnel who have an infantry MOS. They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size. The Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (formerly known as the Total Army Personnel Command) has advised, in similar cases, that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. To be awarded the Purple Heart, substantiating evidence must be presented to show that the Soldier was wounded as the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
2. There are no orders, and the applicant provided none, awarding him the Purple Heart; he is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty List; and there are no medical records available to show that he was treated for a wound as a result of hostile action.
3. The applicant claims that he was injured and was told by his commander, in effect, to seek medical treatment for jungle rot and shrapnel. While treated for jungle rot, shrapnel was removed; however, he has provided no evidence, and there is none available to the Board, to support his claim that he was injured by shrapnel as a result of hostile action.
4. The applicant claims, in effect, that his commander was to recommend him for award of the Purple Heart for his injury and correct his records to show this award; however, it is not shown on his DD Form 214. There is no evidence, and the applicant has provided none, to show that he was recommended for the Purple Heart by his commander.
5. The evidence shows that the applicant held an infantry MOS and was assigned as a security guard with DMAC, USAAG, USMACV; however, there is no evidence, and the applicant provided none to show he served in active ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit serving in Vietnam. He is therefore not entitled to award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and to have it added to his DD Form 214.
6. The applicant claims, in effect, that award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Purple Heart would benefit him greatly in his application for VA benefits he is seeking due to his PTSD problems which are being assessed at the Knoxville Veterans Center. The applicant is advised the Board does not award or approve awards to entitle individuals to VA benefits being sought due to PTSD.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___x____ ____x___ ___x____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
__________x_____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080004137
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080004137
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068494C070402
His WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) shows as authorized awards the Combat Infantryman Badge, the World War II Victory Medal, the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal, the Philippine Liberation Ribbon with one Bronze Service Star, the Army Good Conduct Medal, and the Meritorious Unit Emblem. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. The evidence of record shows that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005858
His military service records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 15 December 1965. Should the applicant obtain a copy of his medical records or some other form of documentation which show his injuries were a result of hostile action and were treated by medical personnel, he can use that documentation as new evidence to resubmit his request. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004448C070208
The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and reconsideration of his earlier appeal to correct his military records by award of the Bronze Star Medal. The evidence shows that the applicant’s record contains administrative error that does not require action by the Board. The Case Management Support Division in St. Louis is requested to correct the applicant’s records to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040004448lC070208
The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and reconsideration of his earlier appeal to correct his military records by award of the Bronze Star Medal. The evidence shows that the applicant’s record contains administrative error that does not require action by the Board. The Case Management Support Division in St. Louis is requested to correct the applicant’s records to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016913
His records do not show he was awarded an infantry MOS or served with an infantry unit during his period of service. The Vietnam Casualty List was reviewed to determine if the applicant had been wounded in action while he served in Vietnam. There is no evidence he was awarded and/or served in an infantry MOS during his period in Vietnam or military service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009087
The evidence shows the applicant was involved in a tussle and not in a firefight. There were no entries made in his service personnel records to show he was wounded as a result of hostile action and no orders were published to award him the Purple Heart for a wound he may have received on 18 July 1968. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by: a. awarding the applicant the Vietnam Service Medal, with four...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014638
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart, the Air Medal, and the Army Commendation Medal. There is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 4 November 1966...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022883
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show, in effect: * his characterization of service is honorable * award of the Purple Heart, Parachutist Badge, and all of his unit citations * he was granted disability for shrapnel wounds to the left shoulder and for the jungle rot that is on his legs * he was exposed to Agent Orange 2. The evidence of record...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009738
The applicant served in Vietnam from 25 November 1967 to 24 October 1968. He stated that as a medic in the Republic of Vietnam, he remembered the applicant being wounded by shrapnel. However, the combat medic, nor the applicant, provided evidence to show that this medical treatment was made a matter of official record.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064852C070421
The applicant's records indicate he was awarded the Purple Heart, for wounds sustained on 5 February 1967, and a Combat Infantryman Badge, while in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states, in effect, that Army Commendation Medals and Bronze Star Medals are both personal decorations, which require recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders. There is, however, no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any, which confirms he was ever recommended...