Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007923
Original file (20090007923.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		BOARD DATE:	  17 November 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090007923 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect:

	a.  her military occupational specialty (MOS) on her DA Form 5011-R (Training Evaluation Summary) be corrected to show MOS 91B1O vice MOS 91A1O; and

	b.  her rank on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show specialist (SPC/E-4) vice private (PVT/E-1).

2.  The applicant states she wants proper recognition of her service.

3.  The applicant provides:

	a.  a copy of her DD Form 214;

	b.  a page from her DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record);

	c.  Orders D-09-075935, U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Personnel Center, St. Louis, MO, dated 30 September 1988;

	d.  a Reserve Components Primary Leadership Development Course Diploma; and

	e.  a DA Form 5011-R and MOS 91A Skill Qualification Test (SQT).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR for 6 years and training in MOS 91B.  She entered on active duty for training (ADT) on 17 August 1982 and was sent to Fort Sam Houston, Texas.  Orders 234-15, Headquarters, Fort Sam Houston, TX, dated 7 December 1982, awarded her a primary MOS of 91B1O.  She completed her training on 19 January 1983 and was issued a DD Form 214 which shows her rank as PVT and her MOS as 91B1O.

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 shows she was awarded MOS 91B1O.

4.  In 1984, the applicant was reassigned from the 73rd Field Hospital to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) by reason of unsatisfactory participation.  Her MOS was shown as 91B1O.

5.  Orders D-09-075935 discharged the applicant from the USAR effective 4 October 1988 in the rank of SPC.

6.  Army MOS manuals for the period of the applicant's service show that MOS 91A and MOS 19B were essentially the same MOS, that of Medical Specialist.  MOS 91A was the entry MOS and MOS 91B was the MOS for Soldiers beyond the rank of SPC.  The list of SQT skills was essentially the same, except in the matter of degree.

7.  The DA Form 5011-R provided by the applicant does not exist in her military personnel records jacket (MPRJ).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant wants a DA Form 5011-R corrected to show MOS 91B1O vice 91A1O, and her ADT DD Form 214 corrected to show she was a SPC.

2.  As to the applicant's rank, she enlisted in the USAR as a PVT and entered ADT as a PVT.  There is no record showing she was ever promoted while on ADT; she achieved the rank of SPC after her period of ADT captured by her DD Form 214.  Her DD Form 214 correctly shows she completed her ADT as a PVT.

3.  As to her MOS, the applicant enlisted for MOS 91B; she trained for and was awarded MOS 91B at Fort Sam Houston; there is no indication anywhere in her records that she held or served in MOS 91A.  Her DD Form 214 correctly shows she was awarded MOS 91B1O.

4.  Because MOS 91A and 91B were essentially the same and were only differentiated by skill level and rank, SQT testing for both MOS's essentially would have been interchangeable.  The DA Form 5011-R is not an official indication of her MOS; block 11 (Primary Specialty) of the DD Form 214 is the official record of her awarded MOS and active service in that MOS.

5.  Because the DA Form 5011-R provided by the applicant does not exist in her MPRJ, there is no official record to correct.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x______  ___x_____  __x___  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090007923



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090007923



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021187

    Original file (20100021187.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 22 (MOS) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following: Type Code Title Date PMOS 91A Medical Corpsman 24 Apr 1970 PMOS 91B Medical Specialist 16 Sep 1970 4. The applicant's contention that he was a 91B Medic instead of a 91E2O Medic with a related civilian occupation and DOT number of Dental Assistant 079.378 was carefully considered and found to have merit.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005917

    Original file (20090005917.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states, in pertinent part, that item 14 (Military Education) will list formal in-service training courses of 40 hours or more successfully completed during the period of service covered by title, length in weeks, and month and year completed. Although the evidence of record shows he was awarded PMOS 91A, there are no orders which show he was awarded the Expert Field Medical Badge and the applicant has not provided any supporting evidence to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011525

    Original file (20090011525.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This form shows her last name as "C-------" and her first name as "J--------." This form shows her last name as "C------" and her first name as "J--------." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. issuing the applicant a DD Form 214 that captures her period of ADT from 6 January 2008 through 19 January 2008 with an entry-level status characterization of service; and b. reissuing the applicant an Honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013910

    Original file (20110013910.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show in block 11 (Primary Specialty) the entries “91B4O Health Care Specialist – 9 years, 2 months”; “91W4O Health Care Specialist -4 years, 9 months”; and “91A10 – Medical Specialist – 2 years, 9 months”; in block 14 (Military Education), that the entry “7” in line four be deleted, and in block 18 (Remarks) that the entry “Service in Iraq 20070910 -20091120” be corrected to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000172

    Original file (20130000172.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides his DD Form 214. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 1 year, 10 months, and 26 days of active service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017398

    Original file (20080017398.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel record to show she was again ordered to active duty for training on 5 December 2001, the date that corresponds to the date entered active duty currently shown on her DD Form 214. Item 35 of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 shows the applicant was released from her AIT and returned to her parent unit on 17 July 2001; however, there is no evidence a DD Form 214 was prepared to document the completion of her IADT and her release from this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007526

    Original file (20130007526.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Character of Service) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "honorable" instead of "uncharacterized." The letter states VA records certified she "separated under honorable conditions from active duty military service." Chapter 4 (Separation for Expiration of Service Obligation) states the service of ARNG Soldiers in an entry-level status upon completion of IADT will be uncharacterized even though they...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016269

    Original file (20130016269.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 October 1983, he was notified by his immediate commander that discharge action was being initiated against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 5 by reason of a personality disorder diagnosed by a competent medical authority. The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his grade as E-5, dates of service from 1981 to 1984, MOS as 91B2O, Parachutist Badge, and reason for separation as something...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023247

    Original file (20110023247.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * her character of service as honorable instead of uncharacterized * her total service to include her U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) inactive duty training and annual training * her rank/grade as specialist (SPC)/E-4 instead of private (PV2)/E-2 * her actual duty served 2. He or she will only receive a DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report); and d. RC Soldiers completing initial ADT that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004107112C070208

    Original file (2004107112C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued on 5 March 1992 be corrected to show her military occupational specialty (MOS) was "MOS 91A (Medical Specialist) versus 94B (Food Service Specialist)." The applicant states, in effect, that on 28 March 1985, she completed the Combat Medical Specialist Course and she performed the duties associated with this MOS while assigned to the 6253rd United States Army Hospital until...