Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006740
Original file (20090006740.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  3 September 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090006740 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 22a(2) (Other Service) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 12 April 1968 to add 10 months and 19 days.

2.  The applicant states prior to being inducted into the Army of the United States (AUS), he served with the Utah Army National (UTARNG) and this service was omitted from his DD Form 214. 

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214; a National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation) for the period ending on 13 April 1966; and Army National Guard (ARNG) Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 13 April 1966.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 



has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The NGB Form 22 submitted by the applicant shows he enlisted in the UTARNG on 25 May 1965 at Fort Douglas, UT.  It shows he served 10 months and 19 days and was honorably discharged on "13" [sic] April 1966 for induction into the AUS.  

3.  The applicant was inducted into the AUS on 13 April 1966.  On 12 April 1968, he was honorably released from active duty after completing 2 years of creditable active service with no time lost, and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group.

4.  Item 22a(1) (Net Service This Period) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 for the period ending 12 April 1968 shows the entry "2" years, "0" months, and "0" days. Item 22a(2) (Other Service) shows the entry "0" years, "0" months, and "0" days and item 22a(3) (Total) (Line (1) plus Line (2)) shows the entry "2" years, "0" months, and "0" days.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents that would be furnished each individual separated from the Army and established standardized procedures for the preparation and distribution of these documents.  The purpose of a separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his military service.  It is a vital record for interested Government agencies which assist the veteran in obtaining the rights and benefits to which he is entitled.  Therefore, it is important that information entered is complete and accurate.  It also established standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It stated that for Item 22a(2) enter all prior service excluding any service shown in item 22a(1).  This includes any period served in the USAR or the ARNG as a reservist not on active duty during the current enlistment. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to add his prior ARNG service of 10 months and 19 days.  The Board recommends approval of his request, but notes his date of discharge from the UTARNG is incorrect by 1 day.


2.  The applicant served 10 months and 19 days in the UTARNG, enlisting on 25 May 1965.  Adding 10 months and 19 days to his enlistment date gives him a discharge date of 12 April 1966, not 13 April 1966.  This is verified by his active duty records.

3.  All active duty records show the applicant was inducted into the AUS on 13 April 1966 for 2 years.  His DD Form 214 shows he was honorably separated on 12 April 1968 with exactly 2 years of service.  The DD Form 214 does not reflect his UTARNG service.

4.  Because the Board accepts the applicant’s AUS induction date of 13 April 1966 as correct, his date of discharge from the UTARNG cannot be on the same date for two reasons.  First, a Soldier cannot be discharged and enlist on the same date; a Soldier is discharged on one day, followed by immediate enlistment on the following day.  Second, a UTARNG discharge date of 13 April 1966 would have given him 10 months and 20 days of National Guard service, not 10 months and 19 days.

5.  Therefore, item 22a(2) of the applicant's DD Form 214 should be amended to show 10 months and 19 days and item 22a(3) should be amended to show 2 years, 10 months, and 19 days.


BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ___X____  ____X__  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  amending item 22a(2) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 to show 10 months and 19 days; and 

	b.  amending item 22a(3) of his DD Form 214 to show 2 years, 10 months, and 19 days.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090006740



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090006740



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000715

    Original file (20120000715.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * He was drafted and he was inducted into the AUS on 19 July 1966 * He enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) a few days later, but his DD Form 214 only shows his RA service * He thinks he should have received the Army Good Conduct Medal * He should have been promoted to E-5 because he was in an E-5 position for which he was trained and experienced for several months 3. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012580

    Original file (20110012580.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his 17 May 1969 DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show he entered the Regular Army on 29 June 1966 and that the periods of service be corrected. He enlisted in the RA on 29 June 1966 (his DD Form 214 erroneously states "23 June 1967") and was separated on 17 May 1969, a period of 2 years, 10 months, and 19 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000816

    Original file (20100000816.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that Item 3 on his DD Form 214 be corrected to show the number "2" as the fifth digit of his SSAN. All documents contained in the applicant's DA Form 201 file shows the number "2" as the fifth digit of his SSAN. There are other corrections required on the applicant's DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020107

    Original file (20090020107.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Armed Forces Examining and Entrance Station, Pittsburgh, PA, Special Orders Number 122, dated 22 June 1966, show the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States (AUS) for a period of 24 months on 22 June 1966. Records show the applicant was inducted into the AUS and entered active duty on 22 June 1966. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct item 11d of his DD Form 214 to show he was separated from active duty effective 21 June 1968.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016246

    Original file (20130016246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. However, since there is no evidence of record which shows he was recommended for promotion to E-5 by a promotion selection board and placed on a permanent recommended promotion list prior to his release from active duty on 22 July 1969, there is insufficient evidence on which to grant his request for a promotion to E-5. His service record is void of evidence which shows he was promoted to the permanent rank of SP4/E-4 prior to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002838

    Original file (20140002838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 31 March 1968 to show completion of 6 years of service instead of only 6 days. The applicant completed two periods of active duty service and he was issued a separate DD Form 214 for each period. There is no evidence the applicant completed another period of active duty service of at least 90 days in duration that would have required the issuance of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015021

    Original file (20130015021.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 24a(1) (Net Service This Period) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer of Discharge) ending on 2 May 1966. His record contains the following documents issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Reception Station: * SO Number 101, dated 3 May 1966, enlisting him in the Regular Army (RA) on 3 May 1966 for 3 years * amendment of DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge memorandum, dated 5 May 1966, wherein his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016583

    Original file (20080016583.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states that item 17c (Date of Entry) of his DD Form 214 incorrectly shows that he entered active duty on 20 January 1973, and that his military records show that he actually entered active duty on 20 January 1971. The applicant's military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States (AUS) on 20 January 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104881C070208

    Original file (2004104881C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of Item 17c (Date of Entry) of his separation document (DD Form 214). A Record of Induction (DD Form 47) on file in the applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) confirms in Item 22a (Date of Induction) that he was inducted and entered active duty on 22 September 1966. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was inducted into the Army and entered active duty on 22 September 1966.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010719

    Original file (20100010719.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he served approximately 24 months in Vietnam from 29 March 1967 to 15 February 1969. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be correctly annotated to show his Vietnam service. The applicant's records show, with 4 days' prior service, he enlisted in the RA for 3 years on 9 July 1966.