Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010719
Original file (20100010719.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  28 September 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100010719


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his foreign service be correctly annotated on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant states he served approximately 24 months in Vietnam from 29 March 1967 to 15 February 1969.  His DD Form 214 only shows 10 months and 17 days.

3.  The applicant provides:

* a letter
* his DD Form 214
* part of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame 


provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States (AUS) on 
5 July 1966 and he was sent to Fort Leonard Wood, MO.  Immediately upon arrival at Fort Leonard Wood, on 8 July 1966, after 4 days as an AUS Soldier, he was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate enlistment in the RA.  On 9 July 1966, he enlisted in the RA for 3 years.

3.  The applicant completed Basic Combat Training at Fort Leonard Wood.  He was then transferred to Fort Eustis, VA for Advanced Individual Training in MOS (military occupational specialty) 67U, Helicopter Repairman.

4.  The applicant departed Fort Eustis on or about 2 March 1967 for Vietnam with leave en route.  He arrived in Vietnam on or about 29 March 1967.  He was assigned to Company A, 15th Transportation Battalion (Aircraft Maintenance), 1st Cavalry Division.  He remained with this unit until he departed Vietnam on 15 February 1969 to return to the United States for release from active duty.

5.  The applicant returned to Fort Lewis, WA and was honorably separated on 15 February 1969.  His DD Form 214, in Block 22 (Statement of Service), shows:

* Block 22a(1) Net Service This Period		2 years  07 months  08 days
* Block 22a(2) Other Service				0 years  00 months  00 days
* Block 22a(3) Total							2 years  07 months  08 days
* Block 22b	     Total Active Service			2 years  07 months  08 days
* Block 22c      Foreign and/or Sea Svc	0 years  10 months  17 days
* Block 22c is also annotated with the acronym "USARPAC" for US Army Pacific

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the policies and procedures for the preparation and issuance of separation documents, including the DD Form 214.  The regulation in effect during the applicant's period of service stated for enlisted Soldiers, Item 22c would be completed as follows:  "Enter total active duty outside continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last oversea theater service was performed [emphasis added]."



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be correctly annotated to show his Vietnam service.

2.  The applicant's records show, with 4 days' prior service, he enlisted in the RA for 3 years on 9 July 1966.  The records show he arrived in Vietnam on 29 March 1967 and remained in Vietnam until 15 February 1969.  Block 22 of his DD Form 214 should show:

* Block 22a(1) Net Service This Period		2 years  07 months  07 days
* Block 22a(2) Other Service				0 years  00 months  04 days
* Block 22a(3) Total							2 years  07 months  11 days
* Block 22b	     Total Active Service			2 years  07 months  11 days
* Block 22c      Foreign and/or Sea Svc	1 years  10 months  18 days

3.  Although the "USARPAC" acronym is not incorrect, it would be more appropriate to use the acronym "USARV" for US Army Vietnam as the location of his foreign service.  The Sample DD Forms 214 contained in Army Regulation 635-5 for the period used the "USARV" acronym.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the entries in Block 22 of the DD Form 214, issued on 15 February 1969, and adding the following entries:

* Block 22a(1) Net Service This Period			2 years  07 months  07 days
* Block 22a(2) Other Service					0 years  00 months  04 days
* Block 22a(3) Total								2 years  07 months  11 days


* Block 22b	     Total Active Service				2 years  07 months  11 days
* Block 22c Foreign and/or Sea Svc  USARV	1 years  10 months  18 days




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010719



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010719



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003792

    Original file (20140003792.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his tour of duty in Vietnam and that the following items are properly completed: * item 22a(1) (Net Service This Period) * item 22a(2) (Other Service) * item 22a(3) (Total) * item 22b (Total Active Service) * item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) 2. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005883

    Original file (20110005883.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to reflect his total active service in block 22 (Statement of Service). The applicant states block 22 of his DD Form 214 shows he only served 6 months and 22 days of active service which is less than that shown for his foreign and/or sea service. The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record – Armed Forces of the United States), and DA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001032

    Original file (20090001032.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further states no RVN service awards are listed on the DD Form 214. The evidence of record confirms the applicant served on active duty for 1 year, 9 months, and 15 days between 9 March 1967 and 23 December 1968 and that he had no prior military service. Therefore, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to award the applicant the AGCM for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 9 March 1967 through 23 December 1968 and to add this award to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000265

    Original file (20110000265.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states a DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty service. It further stated: a. item 22a(1) would show the total service between dates shown in items 10c or 17c and 11d of the DD Form 214, as represented by continual and foreign service, less time lost; b. item 22a(2) would show all prior service excluding any service shown in item 22a(1); c. item 22a(3) is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011067

    Original file (20090011067.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 12 January 1973 to show his service in the Republic of Vietnam. Item 11d (Effective Date) shows the entry "26 Aug 69"; c. Item 22 (Statement of Service) shows the following entries: (1) Item 22a(1) (Net Service This Period) shows "3 1 0"; (2) Item 22a(2) (Other Service) shows "0 6 15"; (3) Item 22a(3) (Total) shows "3 7 15"; (4) Item 22b...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018768

    Original file (20110018768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show that he was inducted on 13 May 1965 and served continuously until he was released from active duty (REFRAD) on 31 January 1968 without a break in service. His records show no evidence that a DD Form 214 was issued at the time. However, the DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he had served 8 months and 23 days of active service this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014063

    Original file (20080014063.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period 6 December 1966 through 8 December 1966 shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) with an honorable characterization of service to enlist in the Regular Army for a three-year term of service after completing 3 days of active military service. The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period 9 December 1966 through 24 August 1969 shows that on 24 August 1969, he was separated from active duty with an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010499

    Original file (20100010499.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he proudly served in Vietnam, but his DD Form 214 does not show this service, nor does it list the Vietnam Service Medal and Vietnam Campaign Medal as authorized awards. The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his foreign service in Vietnam and that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal and Vietnam Campaign Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106456C070208

    Original file (2004106456C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Carol A. Kornhoff | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record confirms the total period of active military service covered by the DD Form 214 in question is 2 years, 10 months and 15 days. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086512C070212

    Original file (2003086512C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows: in Item 22a(1) (Net Service), he was credited with 1 year, 11 months, and 22 days of active military service; in Item 22 a(3) (Total), he was credited with 1 year, 11 months, and 22 days of active military service; in Item 22b (Total Active Service), he was credited with 1 year, 11 months, and 22 days of active military service; in Item 22c (Foreign and Sea Service), he was credited with 4 months and 28 days of foreign service; and in Item 30 (Remarks), it was recorded...