Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000816
Original file (20100000816.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 August 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100000816


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his Social Security Account Number (SSAN) be corrected on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant states due to a typographical error, the fifth digit of his SSAN incorrectly shows as a "4" when it should be a "2."

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and two DD Forms 215 (Correction to DD Form 214).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States (AUS) for 2 years on 6 October 1966 and was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 64B (Heavy Truck Driver).  His record of assignments as recorded on his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows:

Effective Date
Duty MOS
Principal Duty
Organization & Station
6 Oct 1966
None
Induction
Co A, US Army Reception Station, Ft. Jackson, SC
17 Oct 1966
09BOO
Basic Combat Training
Co B, 1st Bn, 52nd Inf, 1st Armored Div, Ft. Hood, TX
16 Dec 1966
64A1T
Advanced Individual Training
Co B, 501st S&T Bn, 1st Armored Div, Ft. Hood, TX
6 Mar 1967
64B2O
Heavy Truck Driver
HHC, 2nd Bn, 46th Inf, 1st Armored Div, Ft. Hood, TX
12 Jul 1967

Casual
En route to USARPAC (Vietnam)
22 Aug 1967
64A1O
Light Truck Driver
566th Transportation Co, USARPAC
15 May 1968

Patient
US Naval Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
7 Jul 1968

Casual
En route to Valley Forge General Hospital, Phoenixville, PA
9 Jul 1968

Patient
Med Hold Co, Valley Forge General Hospital, Phoenixville, PA
15 Aug 1968

Separation
Valley Forge General Hospital, Phoenixville, PA
3.  The applicant served on active duty during a period when Service Numbers were being phased out in favor of SSANs.  When he entered on active duty, he did so with a Service Number which was assigned at his induction station; no SSAN was required or used to identify the applicant.  Later, he was required to provide his SSAN to unit personnel staff and the SSAN was recorded on various documents and orders contained in his DA Form 201 (Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ)).  His records consistently reflect the fifth digit of his SSAN as a "2."

4.  The applicant's records contain documents which show:

* service in the AUS from 6 October 1966 to 15 August 1968, a total of 1 year, 10 months, and 10 days
* service in Vietnam from on or about 12 July 1967 to on or about 28 May 1968, a total of 10 months and 16 days
* wounding on 15 May 1968
* award of the following medals:

   (1)  Purple Heart
   (2)  Good Conduct Medal
   (3)  National Defense Service Medal
   (4)  Vietnam Service Medal with 4 bronze service stars [should be only 3]
   (5)  Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
   (6)  Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)



5.  He was promoted to specialist five (SP5)/E-5 by Special Orders Number 141, Headquarters, US Army Support Command, Cam Ranh Bay, dated 9 May 1968, with a date of rank of 9 May 1968.

6.  The applicant's DD Form 214 that was prepared on temporary records and on his affidavit was woefully incomplete and incorrect.  On 21 April 1970, he was issued a 2-page DD Form 215 with more than a dozen corrections, some of which were, themselves, incorrect.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), in pertinent part, authorizes award of a bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed in Appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal.  During the applicant's service in Vietnam, there were three named campaigns – Counteroffensive, Phase III (1 June 1967-29 January 1968), Tet Counteroffensive (30 January 1968-1 April 1968), and Counteroffensive, Phase IV (2 Apri1 1968-30 June 1968).

8.  Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974, announced   award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U.S. Military Assistance Command and its subordinate units during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 and to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to          28 March 1973.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the policies and procedures for the preparation and issuance of separation documents, including the DD Form 214.  The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  Once a DD Form 214 has been issued, it is normally not reissued except when two DD Forms 215 have been issued and an additional correction is required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests that Item 3 on his DD Form 214 be corrected to show the number "2" as the fifth digit of his SSAN.  All documents contained in the applicant's DA Form 201 file shows the number "2" as the fifth digit of his SSAN.  This correction should be made.

2.  There are other corrections required on the applicant's DD Form 214.  They are:

* Item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) - should be SP5 [DD Form 215 changed it to "PFC E3"]
* Item 5b (Pay Grade) - should be E-5 [DD Form 215 is incorrect]
* Item 6 (Date of Rank) - should be 9 May 1968
* Item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) - should be "566 Trans Co, USARV"
* Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) - should be "USARV  0 years, 10 months, and 16 days"
* Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) should show:  the Republic of 
   Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Vietnam Service 
   Medal with 3 bronze service stars

3.  Because his DD Form 214 was completed from temporary records and the applicant's affidavit, it was replete with errors.  The 2-page DD Form 215 issued on 21 April 1970 corrected some errors while creating other errors.  In order to provide the applicant with a single-source, correct document, he should, as an exception to policy, be issued a new DD Form 214 to show his good and faithful service to our nation.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by voiding his DD Form 214 and DD Form 215 and issuing him a new DD Form 214 with the following corrections:

* Item 3, change the fifth digit to a "2"
* Item 6, insert "09 May 68"
* Item 10a, insert "36 48 42 613"
* Item 10b, insert "Local Board #48, Clearfield PA  16830"
* Item 10c, change to "06 Oct 66"
* Item 12, insert "566 Trans Co, USARV"
* Item 22a(1), change to "1 year, 10 months, 10 days"
* Item 22a(2), insert "0 years, 0 months, 0 days"
* Item 22a(3), insert "1 year, 10 months, 10 days"
* Item 22b, insert "1 year, 10 months, 10 days"
* Item 22c, insert " USARV  0 years, 10 months, 16 days"
* Item 24, add:

o Purple Heart
o Good Conduct Medal
o National Defense Service Medal
o Vietnam Service Medal with 3 bronze service stars
o Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
o Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)
o Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000816



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000816



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018554

    Original file (20070018554.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Orders and documents on file in the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) that contain a SSAN list the number 8 as the fifth digit. As a result, absent any evidence that the applicant attempted to resolve the SSAN issue while he was serving on active duty or that confirms he used a different DOB than the one listed in his military records, it would not be appropriate to change the SSAN and/or DOB listed in his military records, given these were the ones under which he entered...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070267C070402

    Original file (2002070267C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 issued to him on the date of his separation contains a SSAN that differs from the one recorded in his DA Form 20. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant is entitled to be awarded the first award of the AGCM for honorable active duty service from 17 October 1966 through 10 October 1968. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal; showing that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012059

    Original file (20100012059.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his first name in item 1 (Last Name, First Name, Middle Name) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) and that the first and fifth digits in item 3 (Social Security Number (SSN)) be corrected. The entries on the applicant's 1966 induction record and his service personnel records which show his first name is Stephen are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to amend item 1 on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066189C070421

    Original file (2001066189C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, and any other awards associated with his service in Vietnam. The Board also notes that applicant's military personnel file reflects two different SSANs and in the absence of official documentation from the Social Security Administration cannot correct the applicant's records. The evidence confirms that the applicant did serve in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003771

    Original file (20140003771.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) listed his last name as "Pxxxin." With respect to the last name, the evidence of record shows that at the time of his induction into the AUS the applicant listed his last name as "Pxxxin."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018362C080407

    Original file (20070018362C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20), which was prepared upon his entry on active duty, also lists an Army Service Number in Item 1 (Name and Service Number), and does not include a SSAN. The evidence of record also confirms that based on his service and campaign participation in the RVN, the applicant is entitled to the PUC, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and 2 bronze service stars with his VSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057821C070420

    Original file (2001057821C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) contains an entry in block 38 (record of assignments) that shows he was medically evacuated from the RVN to Ireland Army Hospital, Fort Knox, Kentucky, and that he arrived there as a patient on 2 August 1969. Given the evidence of record in this case, the Board finds it reasonable to presume that the hospital commander at Fort Knox promoted the applicant in accordance with applicable regulations in effect at the time based...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002696

    Original file (20110002696.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). There are no orders in his service personnel record awarding him the CIB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal, and b. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001250

    Original file (20150001250.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states the DFC he was awarded for action in the A Shau Valley in Vietnam should be upgraded to the DSC. He provides: * USARV Form 157-R (Recommendation for Decoration for Valor or Merit) * Proposed Citation for the DFC * General Orders for the DFC, dated 9 July 1969 * DFC Award Certificate * DFC Award Citation * General Orders for the DFC for the co-pilot of the aircraft * Information paper, subject: A Shau Valley-Private First Class (PFC), by J___ F__ * five letters of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018168

    Original file (20100018168.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. Based on the available evidence, the applicant should be awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service...