Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005165
Original file (20090005165.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


		BOARD DATE:	  20 August 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090005165 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Reentry (RE) code be changed from RE-4 to RE-3 so that he can regain his Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB).

2.  The applicant states he was told he would be able to get back his MGIB after one year and it has been a little over three years.  

3.  The applicant provides a personal statement in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 October 2003.  At the completion of basic training and advanced individual training, he was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (infantryman).  His highest grade attained was private first class.

3.  The applicant was discharged on 5 September 2006 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct - drug abuse with issuance of a general under honorable conditions discharge.  He completed 2 years and 10 months of active military service with 27 days of lost time.  

4.  His DD Form 214 shows he was issued an RE code of RE-4 and a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of "JKK" (Misconduct-Drug Abuse).  

5.  The applicant provided a personal statement in support of his claim.  He stated he joined the Army on 5 October 2003 and he described his physical training scores.  He also described the difficulties he encountered while he was deployed and the affects of his marriage on his mental state.  His behavior also changed when he returned to Fort Lewis, WA.  He got mixed up with a different crowd and he was discharged for misconduct.  He wanted to further his education and start his life over with a clean slate.  He claimed that he was now more mature and felt he could do a better job in building himself up.  

6.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons.  The regulation shows that the separation program designator “JKK” as shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214 specifies the narrative reason for discharge as “Misconduct-Drug Abuse” and that the authority for discharge under this separation program designator is “AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2)."  

7.  Table 2-3 (SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table), Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes RE code 4 as the proper reentry code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 
14-12c(2) for misconduct - drug abuse.

8.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the U.S. Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes.

9.  RE code 4 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service and the disqualification is not waivable.

10.  Information obtained from the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) website regarding federal benefits states, in part, that VA benefits may be used while the servicemember is on active duty or after the servicemember's separation from active duty with a fully honorable military discharge.  Discharges "under honorable conditions" and "general" discharges do not establish eligibility.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he was told he would be able to get back his MGIB after one year is noted.  However, the evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged with his service characterized as general under honorable conditions and discharges "under honorable conditions" and "general" do not establish eligibility for MGIB benefits.  

2.  The applicant was discharged on 5 September 2006 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) for misconduct - drug abuse.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was separated with a separation code of "JKK" and was assigned an RE code of RE-4 in accordance with the governing regulation.  

4.  The applicant's personal statement was noted.  However, he has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that the RE code issued to him was administratively incorrect, in error or unjust.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090005165





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090005165



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003125

    Original file (20130003125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his previously-denied request to upgrade his general under honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge and to change his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code to a more favorable code. On 24 May 2006, the applicant was discharged accordingly. His SPD and RE codes were assigned based on his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, due to misconduct – drug abuse.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023869

    Original file (20110023869.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Also on 10 July 2001 and consistent with the chain of command's recommendations, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, by reason of misconduct – commission of a serious offense, with a general under honorable conditions character of service. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Army Regulation 635-200 provides for the separation of enlisted Soldiers.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004376

    Original file (20080004376.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 June 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080004376 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. There is no evidence of record which shows the RE code issued to him was administratively incorrect, in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016441

    Original file (20110016441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states that the SPD code JKK is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct (drug abuse). Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant was properly separated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021204

    Original file (20120021204.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 June 2011, he was notified by his immediate commander that separation action was being initiated against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct - abuse of illegal drugs. The "JKK" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), by reason of misconduct - drug abuse. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record confirms...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010638

    Original file (20080010638.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 15 March 2005, the Commander, United States Army Garrison, Fort Richardson, Alaska, recommended that the applicant be separated from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), for the wrongful use of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019810

    Original file (20130019810.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 also shows his character of service as "under honorable conditions (general)"; the separation authority as "Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 14-12c(2)"; the separation program designator (SPD) as "JKK"; his RE code as "4"; and the narrative reason for his separation as "misconduct (drug abuse)." Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established the policies and procedures for completion and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007220

    Original file (20100007220.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities, the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD code to be used for these stated reasons. The regulation shows that the SPD of JKK as shown on the applicant's original DD Form 214 is appropriate for voluntary discharge when the narrative reason for discharge is Misconduct (Drug Abuse) and the authority for discharge is Army Regulation 635–200,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002686

    Original file (20090002686.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. There is no evidence of record which shows the RE code issued to him was administratively incorrect, in error or unjust. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013729

    Original file (20130013729.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 March 2010, the applicant's commander notified him he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 14-12c(2), for misconduct–abuse of illegal drugs. Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The RE code on the applicant's DD Form 214 was assigned...