Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004376
Original file (20080004376.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  10 June 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080004376 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his Reentry (RE) code be changed from RE-4 to RE-3.

2.  The applicant states that it was unjust because he was a private and he told his command about his problems.  He claims that he was never in any trouble the entire time he was in the Army.  He knows he made a mistake, but he was young and dumb back then.  

3.  The applicant provides a memorandum, dated 24 September 2007; a character reference; and a supplemental letter.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  After having had prior service in the U.S. Army Reserve, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 May 2003 at the age of 22.  He was promoted to private first class on 1 October 2003.

3.  He tested positive for cocaine during a Unit Urinalysis Inspection conducted on 29 April 2004.

4.  On 17 June 2004, the applicant was convicted by a summary court-martial of wrongful use of cocaine between on or about 22 April 2004 and 29 April 2004.  He was sentenced to confinement for 14 days, a forfeiture of $795.00 pay for one month, and a reduction to private E-1.  

5.  The applicant was discharged on 3 November 2004 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct - abuse of illegal drugs.  He completed 1 year and 5 months of active military service during this period with 14 days of lost time.  

6.  His DD Form 214 shows he was issued a RE code of RE-4 and a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of "JKK" (Misconduct-Abuse of Illegal Drugs).  

7.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons.  The regulation shows that the separation program designator “JKK” as shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214 specifies the narrative reason for discharge as “Misconduct-Abuse of Illegal Drugs” and that the authority for discharge under this separation program designator is “AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2)."  

8.  Table 2-3 (SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table), Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes RE code 4 as the proper reentry code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 
14-12c(2) for misconduct - abuse of illegal drugs.

9.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the U.S. Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes.

10.  RE code 4 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service and the disqualification is not waivable.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was discharged on 3 November 2004 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) for misconduct - abuse of illegal drugs.

2.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was separated with a separation code of "JKK" and was assigned an RE code of RE-4 in accordance with the governing regulation in effect at the time.  

3.  There is no evidence of record which shows the RE code issued to him was administratively incorrect, in error or unjust.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

xxx______  xx_____  xx______  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      xxxxxxxxxxx_   ___
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080004376





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080004376



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001498

    Original file (20110001498.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The record confirms the applicant was separated by reason of misconduct (drug abuse) based on his wrongful use of cocaine. Absent any evidence of error or injustice in the separation process, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007125

    Original file (20080007125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the record of his Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) hearing and associated documents in support of his application. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was separated under the provisions of Paragraph 14-12c, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense (abuse of illegal drugs) based on his multiple incidents of illegal use of marijuana and cocaine. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011668

    Original file (20060011668.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation document (DD Form 214) he was issued at the time confirms that he held the rank of private/E-1 (PV1), and had completed a total 3 years, 8 months and 1 day of active military service. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. However, by regulation, the RE-4 code assigned to the applicant was the proper code to assign members...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020757

    Original file (20090020757.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 3 November 2004, the applicant was notified of his pending separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-12c, for commission of a serious offense (abuse of illegal drugs). The regulation shows that the SPD code of JKK as shown on the applicant's DD Form 214 is appropriate for involuntary discharge when the narrative...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021420

    Original file (20090021420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 September 2008, the separation authority approved the unit commander's request and directed that the applicant be separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(1), with a general discharge. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes), in effect at the time of the applicant's separation, provided the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011602

    Original file (20060011602.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On that same day, the applicant's commander recommended that he be separated from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct-commission of a serious offence, prior to his ETS date. The applicant's separation code of "JKK" is consistent with the basis for his separation and the RE Code applied to his DD Form 214 is consistent with the separation code; therefore, the applicant is not entitled to a change of his separation code or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007469

    Original file (20100007469.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 December 2008, the applicant's unit commander notified the applicant that he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 14-12c, by reason of commission of a serious offense based on the use of illegal drugs. On 13 January 2009, the separation authority directed that the applicant be separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001433

    Original file (20090001433.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 March 2008, the separation authority approved the applicant’s discharge under the provisions of chapter 14 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of misconduct – abuse of illegal drugs – and directed the applicant be furnished a general discharge. A discharge under other than honorable conditions was normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter. The "JKK" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under chapter 14-12c of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007220

    Original file (20100007220.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities, the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD code to be used for these stated reasons. The regulation shows that the SPD of JKK as shown on the applicant's original DD Form 214 is appropriate for voluntary discharge when the narrative reason for discharge is Misconduct (Drug Abuse) and the authority for discharge is Army Regulation 635–200,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015085

    Original file (20080015085.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 August 2006, the applicant's commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of wrongful use of cocaine. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation...