Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013729
Original file (20130013729.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  25 March 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130013729 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a change of his reentry (RE) code.

2.  He states he was given RE code "4" when he was discharged, which does not allow him to reenter service.  He is well aware of the seriousness of his actions.  He asks that he be given an RE code that will allow him to enlist.  

3.  He provides no documentary evidence in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 10 August 2009, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.

3.  On 9 March 2010, while attending initial entry training, he accepted nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, for wrongfully using cocaine between 30 December 2009 and 4 January 2010.  

4.  On 29 March 2010, the applicant's commander notified him he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 14-12c(2), for misconduct–abuse of illegal drugs.  His commander informed him he was recommending that his service be uncharacterized and he was advised of his rights.

5.  On 29 March 2010, the applicant waived his right to counsel and elected not to submit statements in his own behalf.  

6.  On 30 March 2010, the separation authority approved his separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), and directed that his service be uncharacterized.  

7.  On 6 April 2010, he was discharged in accordance with the separation authority's decision.  The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued at that time shows in:

* item 25 (Separation Authority) – "AR635-200, PARA 14-12C(2)"
* item 26 (Separation Code) – "JKK"
* item 27 (RE Code) – "4"
* item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) – "MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE)"

8.  On 2 February 2011, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) voted to change the applicant's characterization of service from uncharacterized to general, under honorable conditions.  The ADRB voted against changing the reason for his discharge.

9.  As a result of the ADRB's decision, the applicant was issued a new DD Form 214 to reflect the change in his characterization of service.  This DD Form 214 shows in:

* item 25 – "AR635-200, PARA 14-12C(2)"
* item 26 – "JKK"
* item 27 – "4"
* item 28 – "MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE)"


10.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designators (SPD)) provides the SPD code to be entered in item 26 of the DD Form 214.  Soldiers separated by reason of misconduct (drug abuse) under the provisions of Army Regulation 635–200, paragraph 14–12c(2), are assigned the SPD code of "JKK."  

11.  The SPD/RE Codes Cross Reference Table provides instructions for determining the RE code to assign to Active Army Soldiers when they are separated.  The table shows the SPD code of "JKK" corresponds to an RE code of "4."

12.  Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) provides eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army, U.S. Army Reserve, and Army National Guard.  Table 3-1 states RE code "4" applies to Soldiers who are separated from their last period of service with a nonwaivable disqualification.  They are ineligible for enlistment.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The RE code on the applicant's DD Form 214 was assigned based on his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 
14-12c(2).  RE code "4" is associated with this type of discharge and it is properly entered on his DD Form 214.

2.  His desire to reenter military service, while commendable, is not a sufficient basis for changing an entry on his DD Form 214 that is correct.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  __X___  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013729



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013729



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020184

    Original file (20120020184.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 January 2010, the applicant's immediate commander notified him of his intent to initiate separation action against him in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 14-12c for misconduct - abuse of illegal drugs. Accordingly, the ADRB voted to grant him relief in the form of upgrading his discharge to a fully honorable discharge and changing the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003122C070206

    Original file (20050003122C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of Item 25 (Separation Authority), Item 26 (Separation Code) and Item 27 (Reentry Code) of his 21 June 1994 separation document (DD Form 214). Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The evidence of record confirms the applicant’s commander recommended his separation under the provisions of paragraph...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120023017

    Original file (AR20120023017.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier’s separation specifically allows such characterization. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020286

    Original file (20090020286.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 March 2006, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge for commission of a serious offense under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c and directed the applicant receive a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. SPD code JKK is the correct code for Soldiers separated under paragraph 14-12c(2) of Army Regulation 635-200. The applicant's request to change his RE code was carefully considered, but it is not supported by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012042

    Original file (20120012042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 August 2009, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, by reason of misconduct - commission of a serious offense and directed her service be uncharacterized. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate for a Soldier discharged for patterns of misconduct; however, the discharge authority may direct an honorable or general discharge if such are...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120012193

    Original file (AR20120012193.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 April 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 4 May 2011, for misconduct (drug abuse), under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c(2), with a SPD Code of JKK, and a RE code of 4. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)," and the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004617

    Original file (AR20130004617.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007220

    Original file (20100007220.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities, the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD code to be used for these stated reasons. The regulation shows that the SPD of JKK as shown on the applicant's original DD Form 214 is appropriate for voluntary discharge when the narrative reason for discharge is Misconduct (Drug Abuse) and the authority for discharge is Army Regulation 635–200,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021517

    Original file (AR20120021517.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the characterization of service was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. On 30 June 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022175

    Original file (20100022175.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 further states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. It states, in pertinent part, that SPD code JKK is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14-12c, by reason of misconduct - drug abuse. He has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or...