Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003270
Original file (20090003270.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        27 MAY 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090003270 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states that during a mortar attack while on duty at his base camp in Na Trang, Republic of Vietnam, he sustained a broken right wrist and was taken to a field hospital where his arm was examined and was put in a cast. He refused the Purple Heart at the time because he felt that an award of that significance was best awarded to members with more serious injuries, but after suffering intermittently for the past 40 years including having to have surgery to remove the fractured bone from that injury, he now feels the award is justified.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical History), dated 6 December 1969; a copy of his electronic clinical document, dated 20 June 1995; five statements dated in January 2009, from his former personnel sergeant, comrades, and former unit members; two photographs; and a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or discharge), dated 6 December 1969, in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 24 April 1967.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 84B (Photographer).  

4.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 also shows he completed 1 year, 7 months, and 6 days of foreign service, presumably in the Republic of Vietnam.  This form also indicates his last duty assignment and major command were Company A, 8th Psychological Battalion, 4th Psychological Operations Group, U.S. Army Republic of Vietnam (USARV).

5.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 further shows he was honorably released from active duty in the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4, as an overseas returnee, and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) on 6 December 1969.  

6.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.  Item 24 does not show award of the Purple Heart.

7.  The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) is not available for review with this case.  

8.  The applicant's name is not shown on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.



9.  The applicant's complete medical records are not available for review with this case.  However, the applicant submitted a copy of his Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical History), dated 6 December 1969, in which he indicated that he suffered a broken right wrist and was treated at the 8th Field Hospital during his service in the Republic of Vietnam.  

10.  During the processing of this case, a member for the Board staff reviewed the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS) maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command (HRC), which is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973.  This review failed to reveal any Purple Heart orders on file for the applicant.

11.  The applicant submitted five statements of support as follows:

	a.  in a statement, dated 12 January 2009, the applicant’s former S-1 message center sergeant states that his duties included routing and distributing all official and unofficial mail, documents, messages, and packages into and out of the unit headquarters.  In early 1969, while culling through documentation left by his predecessor, he saw a hand-written note about a Purple Heart for the applicant with a question mark.  He did not know the applicant at the time and placed the note in a stack of non-urgent items for the command sergeant major’s (CSM) attention.  In late September 1969, the CSM instructed him to bring a box of Purple Heart awards back from USARV.  This brought to his mind the note he had found.  He then showed the note to the CSM who recognized the applicant as the one injured in a mortar attack and that he (the applicant) declined to complete the paperwork for it because others were more seriously injured.  The former S-1 message center sergeant also states that the CSM said that the applicant was making a mistake by refusing the Purple Heart; 

	b.  in a statement, dated 13 January 2009, a comrade-in-arms and former member of the unit states that he was stationed with the applicant in the same unit as an illustrator and that during one late-night mortar attack in September or October 1968, they were moving out under fire to retrieve their weapons when the applicant fell and sustained a broken wrist and a sharp bang to the head; 

	c.  in a statement, dated 9 January 2009, another of the applicant’s former unit members states that he served with the 8th Psychological Operations Battalion from approximately May 1968 to June 1969.  He adds that to the best of his recollection, the applicant suffered an arm or a wrist injury as a result of a mortar attack which occurred in approximately October 1968; 


	d.  in a statement, dated 22 January 2009, a former unit member and combat artist who worked on the leaflet program states that the weapons were stored in a secured armory in their base camp.  One night they came under heavy mortar attack and were instructed to retrieve their weapons and take cover in their bunkers.  During the attack which took place around the end of September or beginning of October 1968, they were moving out under fire to retrieve their weapons when the applicant suffered a broken wrist.  It was a hectic situation at the time, but when the dust settled, he was put into a cast for his injury; and 

	e.  in a statement, dated 21 January 2009, a Soldier who was stationed in Na Trang, Vietnam from May 1968 to April 1969, states that a photographer of Company A broke his right arm jumping into a bunker while he was under fire. 

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart and the evidence presented was carefully considered; however, it is insufficient to award the applicant the Purple Heart in this case.  None of the authors of the statements provided by the applicant states that he witnessed the applicant being injured or wounded as a result of the hostile attack. 

2.  The Purple Heart differs from all other decorations in that an individual is not "recommended" for the decoration; rather he or she is entitled to it upon meeting specific criteria.  When contemplating an award of this decoration, the key issue that commanders must take into consideration is the degree to which the enemy caused the injury.  The fact that the proposed recipient was participating in direct or indirect combat operations is a necessary prerequisite, but is not sole justification for award.

3.  There is no evidence in the applicant’s reconstructed records that shows the wrist injury resulted from hostile action or that he was treated for such injury.  In the absence of documentation that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X______  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ XXX  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003270



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003270



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013542

    Original file (20090013542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090013542 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. The service medical record provided by the applicant does not show that the lacerations to his legs were the result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017053

    Original file (20140017053.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. Item 40 (Wounds) he fractured his left wrist on 10 July 1969. d. Item 41 (Awards and Decoration) no awards of the Purple Heart. f. Each approved award of the Purple Heart must exhibit all of the following factors: wound, injury or death must have been the result of enemy or hostile act; international terrorist attack; or friendly fire (as defined in paragraph b(8) above) the wound or injury must have required treatment by medical officials; and the records of medical treatment must have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024931

    Original file (20100024931.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in his military personnel records awarding him the Purple Heart during his period of service in Vietnam. Despite that there are no orders awarding him the Purple Heart, his former unit commander and a former service member confirmed the applicant was struck by shrapnel from a mortar round on 14 May 1969, in Vietnam, as a result of hostile action and received treatment by medical authorities. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014501

    Original file (20100014501.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the applicant’s service personnel records. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence in which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008021

    Original file (20140008021.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show award of the Purple Heart for injuries he received in Vietnam. A letter from the Military Order of the Purple Heart, dated 23 July 2003, which states there was no evidence in his record that shows he was treated for a shrapnel wound to his right hand during his military service. It states the Purple Heart is awarded to members wounded in action and states that in order to award the Purple Heart, there must be evidence the wound for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008220

    Original file (20120008220.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. The Purple Heart requires: * the wound was the result of hostile action * treatment of the wound by medical personnel * documentation of the wound in official records 3. There is no evidence in the available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021323

    Original file (20120021323.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: a. An email, dated 23 January 2012, from a Verizon email user who states he was the unit medic at the time in question and that he treated the applicant for a small concussion at Vinh Kim after a mortar round knocked him off his feet in February 1969. c. A statement, dated 12 January 2012, from a radio telephone operator who served in the same unit at the time. Therefore, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004351

    Original file (20090004351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's medical records are not available for review with this case. There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart; there is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds; and his name is not shown on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017020

    Original file (20140017020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The communications center where the applicant was assigned was also under attack and explosions were occurring all around them. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Based on these statements, it appears the applicant ran from the communications center during the mortar fire attack and ran into the wall surrounding the building and knocked himself unconscious.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010020

    Original file (20110010020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. Neither form lists any injury or medical treatment he received while on active duty. _______ _ __X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.