Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013542
Original file (20090013542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  14 January 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090013542 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of an earlier request for award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he originally provided a health record (one-page document) with entries on both sides and apparently entries on one side of the medical record were missed/overlooked during his initial review.  He points out that this health record states he was treated on 3/4 September 1970 for multiple lacerations on both legs as a result of being caught in barb wires.  He contends that the description is partially accurate but it was a razor wire obstacle surrounding a bunker and he was cut on both arms as well as his legs.  He claims that the attack occurred in the Kontom area, that they flew to Nha Trang, and that he was treated at the 8th Field Hospital.  

3.  The applicant provides a service medical record with entries dated 25 March 1979, 10 July 1970, 3 September 1970, and 4 September 1970 in support of his request for reconsideration. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090004351, on 7 July 2009.  The applicant contended that he was treated for injuries to his legs, arms, and chest at the 8th Field Hospital in Nha Trang, the Republic of Vietnam, as a result of a rocket/mortar attack.
2.  The service medical record provided by the applicant will be considered by the Board since it cannot be determined if the original Board considered the entries on both sides of this document.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 May 1969 for a period of 
2 years.  He served in Vietnam from 2 December 1969 to 12 November 1970.

4.  The applicant provided a service medical record which shows he was treated at the 25th Medical Detachment on 3 and 4 September 1970 for lacerations to his legs.  The record states that he got caught on barb wires causing multiple lacerations on both legs right above the knees.  However, there is no evidence that this injury was the result of hostile action.  

5.  The applicant was released from active duty on 13 November 1970 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) for completion of his remaining service obligation.

6.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.

7.  There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

8.  The applicant's DA Form 20 does not show entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 is blank.  The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

9.  On 12 November 1970, the applicant underwent a separation physical examination which makes no mention of any injuries or wounds sustained as a result of hostile action in the RVN.  Items 35 (Upper Extremities) and 37 (Lower Extremities) of his Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 
12 November 1970, shows he was rated normal.

10.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

There is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in Republic of Vietnam.  The service medical record provided by the applicant does not show that the lacerations to his legs were the result of hostile action.  Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20090004351, dated 7 July 2009.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013542



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013542



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004351

    Original file (20090004351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's medical records are not available for review with this case. There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart; there is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds; and his name is not shown on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015624

    Original file (20140015624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * National Archives (NA) Form 13038 (Certification of Military Service) * Standard Form (SF) 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care) * SF 93 (Report of Medical History), dated 20 November 1980 * a note, dated 21 January 1992, from Dr. C CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. He also indicated his left leg was crushed in Germany which caused constant pain. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017096C071029

    Original file (20060017096C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Separation or Discharge) and a Standard Form 180 (Request Pertaining to Military Records). There is no evidence of record and the applicant provided no evidence to show he was wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078291C070215

    Original file (2002078291C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. However, this statement, is not sufficient by itself as a basis for award of the Purple Heart, in view of evidence of record which shows the applicant was not wounded. The preponderance of evidence in this case shows the applicant was not wounded or otherwise entitled to the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028559

    Original file (20100028559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. His records do not contain any evidence of being wounded or being awarded the Purple Heart. There are no records that show the applicant was wounded or awarded the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001264C070206

    Original file (20050001264C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his discharge document to show award of the Purple Heart and that he was in a Prisoner of War (POW) status. There is no evidence in the records that show he was in a POW status while he was in Vietnam. Since the applicant did not depart Vietnam until 18 February 1971, this provided Army officials more than a month and a half to report the appropriate changes in the applicant's duty status, to notify his next-of-kin, and document the applicant's status...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001264C070206

    Original file (20050001264C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his discharge document to show award of the Purple Heart and that he was in a Prisoner of War (POW) status. There is no evidence in the records that show he was in a POW status while he was in Vietnam. Since the applicant did not depart Vietnam until 18 February 1971, this provided Army officials more than a month and a half to report the appropriate changes in the applicant's duty status, to notify his next-of-kin, and document the applicant's status...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018847

    Original file (20110018847.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * self-authored statements * his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 5 July 1968 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of official documentary evidence such as operation orders, morning reports,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005960

    Original file (20080005960.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. As a result, there is no evidence in the applicant's military records, and the applicant failed to provide evidence which conclusively shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009856

    Original file (20100009856.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. There is no evidence in the applicant's service records that shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Korea. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant has not provided evidence that shows his injury was a result of hostile action.