Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008021
Original file (20140008021.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  18 December 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140008021 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his record to show award of the Purple Heart for injuries he received in Vietnam.

2.  He states his record should accurately reflect his service in Vietnam.

3.  He submitted:

* his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Form 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claim)
* a self-authored statement
* pictures
* a letter
* a statement
* a hand-drawn map

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 24 August 1966.

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

	a.  item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in Vietnam from 13 January 1967 to 10 January 1968;

	b.  item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to:

		(1)  C Company, 504th Military Police (MP) Battalion (Airborne) from 	    1 February to 20 June 1967;

		(2)  212th MP Company from 21 June to 9 July 1967; 

		(3)  180th MP Detachment from 10 July to 14 August 1967; and 

		(4)  212th MP Company from 15 August 1967 to 9 January 1968.

	c.  item 40 (Wounds) is blank; and 

	d.  item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not list award of the Purple Heart.

4.  On 23 August 1968, he was honorably released from active duty.  He had completed 2 years of total active service.  His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and two Overseas Service Bars.

5.  The Adjutant General's Office Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty listing does not list the applicant as a casualty.

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS) maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Military Awards Branch, which is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

7.  There are no medical records in his official military personnel file that show he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam and treated for those wounds.

8.  He submitted:

	a.  A VA Form 21-4138 and allied documents, dated 6 November 2003, wherein he stated he was submitting pictures showing the mortar attack on his base which resulted in a shrapnel wound to his right wrist and his continued flashbacks and memories of this incident.

	b.  A letter from the Military Order of the Purple Heart, dated 23 July 2003, which states there was no evidence in his record that shows he was treated for a shrapnel wound to his right hand during his military service.  

	c.  A statement from a former service member who indicates he may have served with applicant in Vietnam, but doesn't remember him.  

	d.  Pictures he indicates are of himself, the base where he was stationed, and the equipment that was damaged during the mortar attack. 

	e.  A drawing that he indicates is the Soc Trang Army Air Field.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the Army's awards policy.  It states the Purple Heart is awarded to members wounded in action and states that in order to award the Purple Heart, there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for award of the Purple Heart has been carefully considered and it was determined that there is insufficient evidence to support his request. 

2.  There is no corroborating evidence of record which shows he was injured or wounded as a result of enemy action, that the wound required medical treatment, and the treatment was made a matter of official record.  The applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty listing or in ADCARS.  There is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:
_______  _________  _________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

_______  _________  _________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  _________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ____x____   DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008021



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008021



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012770

    Original file (20080012770.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he sustained shrapnel wounds during a mortar and rocket attack on the evening of 26 March 1969 while stationed at Dong Tam base camp in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The applicant contends, in effect, that his request for award of the Purple Heart should be reconsidered based on new evidence he presents concerning shrapnel wounds he sustained during a mortar and rocket attack on the evening of 26 March 1969 while stationed at Dong Tam base camp in the RVN. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019762

    Original file (20110019762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart. In support of his request he provides a statement, dated 20 August 2011, from an individual who states he was a company medic who treated the applicant for a head wound during August or September 1968. _________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017229

    Original file (20060017229.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 June 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060017229 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states, in effect, that he received a wound from shrapnel to his right arm from enemy mortar fire and that he was treated in the field by a medic. There also is no evidence in his service personnel records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004894

    Original file (20120004894.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence showing he was awarded the Purple Heart. There is no evidence in the applicant's military personnel record that shows he was wounded or injured in action as a result of a hostile act of the enemy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020521

    Original file (20110020521.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Although his separation physical examination document notes shrapnel wound to his left forearm, there is no corroborating evidence that shows he met the criteria for award of the Purple Heart. __________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012154

    Original file (20140012154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    f. The ROP stated that his medical records were not available for the time he was in Vietnam and that his personnel records were void of nearly all documentation related to Vietnam. He has the Army Commendation Medal, shrapnel still in his arm, and the Board states he needs more proof. There is no available evidence of record and the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence provided showing he show he sustained a wound/injury as a result of enemy action, received treatment, and that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008323

    Original file (20120008323.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of his official record shows no evidence of the applicant being wounded or being treated for any such wounds or injuries. While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim that he was wounded in Vietnam is not in doubt, there is no evidence of record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action, that he required treatment by medical personnel, and that such medical treatment was made a matter of official record. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003239

    Original file (20090003239.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no entry in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations), of the applicant's DA Form 20 showing he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was authorized to wear any unit awards that were awarded to his unit while he was a member of the unit. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register), which lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam, shows the unit the applicant was assigned to was awarded: the Valorous Unit Award, for action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012637

    Original file (20090012637.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that during his service with the 2nd Battalion, 327th Infantry in Vietnam, his unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for service from 19 July 1968 to 14 May 1969 based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 43, dated 1970 and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for service from 18 March 1868 to 2 May...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010712

    Original file (20100010712.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This publication shows that the 6th Battalion, 27th Artillery Regiment, during the time of the applicant's assignment, was cited for the Meritorious Unit Commendation during the period January – October 1966 by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 17, dated in 1968. d. DAGO Number 8, dated 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for service in Vietnam to Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during...