Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001878
Original file (20090001878.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE: 	        2 June 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090001878 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 28 April 2005, items 11 (Primary Specialty) and 14 (Military Education), be corrected.

2.  The applicant states that he was only a truck driver for 4 months and he has certificates of training to show that he has military education which was omitted from his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides excerpts from his military records.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in pay grade E-3 for assignment to a troop program unit on 30 November 1988 with 4 months of prior active service and 5 years, 7 months, and 13 days of prior inactive service.

3.  He enlisted in the Army National Guard in pay grade E-1 on 28 February 2001.

4.  He again enlisted in the USAR in pay grade E-3 on 12 May 2003.

5.  The applicant was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom on 8 October 2004.

6.  On 15 April 2005, the applicant's commander recommended that the applicant be separated for misconduct, commission of a serious offense, based on him testing positive for cocaine.  In the separation packet, the applicant's military occupational specialty (MOS) was recorded as 88M, motor transport operator.

7.  The applicant's records do not show that he completed any military schools during this period of active duty.

8.  On 28 April 2005, the applicant was discharged under other than honorable conditions.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows:

	a.  in item 11, "88M1O 00 MOTOR TRANSPORT OPERATOR--21 YRS-11 MOS//88U1O 00 RAILWAY OPERATIONS CREWMEMBER (RC)--15 YRS-8 MOS//NOTHING FOLLOWS."

	b.  in item 14, "NONE//NOTHING FOLLOWS."
   
9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  This regulation, in effect at the time, provided, in pertinent part, that the MOS codes, titles, years, and months served will be entered in item 11.  Enter the titles of all MOSs served for at least 1 year (with the exception of Reservists and Guardsmen serving short tours of active duty) and include for each MOS the number of years and months served.  For time determination, 16 days or more count as 1 month.  Do not count basic training and advanced individual training.  In the processing of similar cases, the Human Resources Command - Alexandria (HRC-A) clarified the entries of MOSs on DD Forms 214.  The HRC-A stated that since a DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty, only the time served in MOSs during the period covered by the DD Form 214 is entered in item 11.
10.  Army Regulation 635-5, in effect at the time, in pertinent part, stated that in-service (resident) training courses, title, number of weeks, and year successfully completed during this period of service will be entered in item 14.  It further stated that this information is to assist the member after separation in job placement and counseling; therefore, training courses for combat skills are not listed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence that the applicant successfully completed any military schooling during his period of active duty ending on 28 April 2005.  Since only military schooling which was successfully completed during the period covered by a DD Form 214 is to be entered in item 14, the entry "NONE//NOTHING FOLLOWS" was the correct entry and there is no reason to change it.

2.  However, the applicant is correct in that the entry in item 11 is in error.  In accordance with guidance provided by HRC-A, only the time spent in an MOS during the period covered by the DD Form 214 is to be entered in item 11.  Since the applicant's records show that he held MOS 88M during the time he was on active duty, that is the sole MOS which should have been entered on his DD Form 214.  Since he was on active duty for 6 months and 21 days, the correct entry for time served in the MOS is 7 months.

3.  However, correcting item 11 would make the applicant worse off, and it is the policy of the Board not to correct a record in a manner which would make an applicant worse off.  As such, the entry in item 11 will remain unchanged.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001878



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001878



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000793

    Original file (20140000793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This form also shows he completed 1 year and 1 day of foreign service during this period of active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. The applicant provided a DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 January 2005 that shows he was awarded MOS 88M after he completed the required active service and was released from active duty training to his USAR unit.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026063

    Original file (20100026063.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction to her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), Item 11 (Primary Specialty Number, Title, and Years and Months in Specialty), to add her secondary and additional military occupational specialties (MOSs). The applicant is therefore entitled to correction of Item 11 of her DD Form 214 to also show the entry, "76P, Materiel Control and Accounting Specialist, 01 Year 03 Months and 76Y, Unit Supply Specialist, 4 Years and 4 Months." ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011516

    Original file (20110011516.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he served in MOS 35M while on active duty, but his DD Form 214 shows he served as an 88M. Orders 301-408, issued by the TXARNG, dated 27 October 2008, ordered the applicant to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) for a period not to exceed 400 days, effective 25 November 2008. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 1 year and 27 days of net active service this period.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014585

    Original file (20140014585.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant contends that he served in primary MOS 37F during his service in Afghanistan and that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show that MOS. However, there is insufficient evidence in the applicant's record and he did not provide sufficient evidence to support his contention that his commander or the designated MOS proponent awarded him by permanent order MOS 37F upon completion of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003562

    Original file (20150003562.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This is no evidence in his record that shows he completed any military training course and/or was awarded the MOS 31B or 88M during the period of active duty service between 24 July 2006 and 4 November 2007. The DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021856

    Original file (20100021856.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It provides, in pertinent part, that for: * item 11, enter the titles of all MOS served for at least 1 year and include for each MOS the number of years ad months served * item 12f, enter the total amount of foreign service completed during the period covered by the DD Form 214 * for item 18, enter in the remarks section “SERVICE IN (Name of country Deployed) From (inclusive dates for example. Evidence shows the applicant served in Iraq for a period of 1 year, 2 months, and 29 days during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025250

    Original file (20110025250.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 August 1991 to show his combat service and a combat specialty. His DD Form 214 for this period of service shows in: * Item 11 (Primary Specialty (List number, title, and years and months in specialty. His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows in: * Item 5 (Overseas Service) he served in Saudi Arabia from 4 November 1990 to 22 July 1991 * Item 17...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009214

    Original file (20110009214.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214. The DD Form 214 he was issued for this period of service shows in Block 11 his PMOS as 88M and indicates he served as such for 2 years and 7 months. The evidence of record show that as of 5 March 2004 he had held and served in PMOS 88M for 2 years and 7 months and PMOS 63B for 5 years and 6 months.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008055

    Original file (20140008055.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence in the available records which shows he was awarded MOS 88M. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to amend item 11 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 13 June 1991.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011989

    Original file (20130011989.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), promotion orders to pay grade E-7, and a printout from an Army MOS website. Item 11 of the DD Form 214 is intended to show MOSs held during the current period of service, not how long a Soldier served in a particular duty MOS or at a particular skill level. Item 11 of the applicant's DD Form 214 is incorrect in that he held MOS 74D4O when he retired.