Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008055
Original file (20140008055.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:	  8 January 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140008055 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 11 (Primary Specialty) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 13 June 1991.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  His DD Form 214 and DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) contain incorrect information.  His military occupational specialty (MOS) should be listed as "Driver Support 88M Transportation Fuel/HEMTT [Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck]" (correctly known as MOS 88M (Motor Transport Operator).  He transported fuel (diesel and jet accelerator) and supplies.

	b.  The MOS's listed are from his Reserve unit, not what he did or was trained in at Fort Benning, Georgia, before he deployed in support of the Gulf War.

	c.  This incorrect information will impact his service-connection claim.

	d.  He was also involved, but not one of the injured, in the February 1991 scud attack on the Dhahran barracks.  It is very possible his records may have been destroyed in the attack since he has been trying to locate his records for many years without success.

3.  The applicant provides a detailed letter of explanation.



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Having prior service in the Regular Army, the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 19 August 1976.  Item 6 (MOS's) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) shows he was awarded:

* primary MOS 76Y (Unit Supply Specialist) effective 24 July 1987
* secondary MOS 11B (Infantryman) effective 7 April 1987
* additional MOS 94B effective 7 April 1987

3.  He was ordered to active duty on 15 January 1991 in support of Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm.  He served in Southwest Asia from 5 February 1991 to 24 May 1991.  On 13 June 1991, he was honorably released from active duty.

4.  Item 11 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 13 June 1991 shows the following entries:

* 76Y1O-UNIT SUPPLY SPECIALIST, 8707
* 94B1O-FOOD SERVICE SPECIALIST, 8704
* NOTHING FOLLOWS

5.  There is no evidence in the available records which shows he was awarded MOS 88M.

6.  A DD Form 215, dated 12 May 1992, amended item 11 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 13 June 1991 to show the entry "76Y1O UNIT SUPPLY SPECIALIST 00YRS 07MOS//NOTHING FOLLOWS."

7.  He was honorably discharged from the USAR on 11 May 1993.

8.  According to the U.S. Army Center of Military History, U.S. Army participation in the Persian Gulf War emphasized several types of specialized training.  The decision to haul, rather than drive, heavy equipment overland in the Persian Gulf created a demand to train an additional 1,000 heavy equipment drivers quickly.  The Transportation School reduced the normal training time of 8 weeks to 4 for motor transport operators, MOS 88M, and successfully trained the additional drivers.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It established standardized policy for preparation of the DD Form 214.  It stated to enter the titles of all MOS's served (clarified by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command to mean held) for at least 1 year from the Enlisted Record Brief and include the number of years and months served for each MOS in item 11.  For time determination, 16 days or more count as a month.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

Although the applicant contends he was trained in MOS 88M and his sincerity is not in doubt, there is no evidence of record and he provided no evidence that shows he was awarded MOS 88M.  Only MOS's awarded are entered on the DD Form 214.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to amend item 11 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 13 June 1991.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X______  _X__  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X______________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008055



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008055



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080020055

    Original file (20080020055.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 12 June 1991 as follows: a. show his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 91B (Medical Specialist) and adding his Army Good Conduct Medal; and b. award of the Kuwait Liberation Medal (Saudi Arabia), the Kuwait Liberation Medal (Kuwait), the Meritorious Unit Award, and three bronze service stars to be affixed to his already-awarded Southwest Asia Service Medal....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005662

    Original file (20110005662.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant served in Southwest Asia in support of Operation Desert Shield/Storm from 18 January to 12 August 1991; therefore, he served a qualifying period of service for award of the Kuwait Liberation Medal (Saudi Arabia) and the Kuwait Liberation Medal (Kuwait) and correction of his DD Form 214 to show both awards. By regulation, he served a qualifying period for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021501

    Original file (20090021501.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal, the Army Reserve Components Overseas Training Ribbon (2nd Award), and the Armed Forces Reserve Medal with “Hourglass” and “M” device. With respect to award of the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal, the evidence of record shows the applicant’s immediate commander awarded him the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal for service from 10 December 1986 through 10...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004490

    Original file (20140004490.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show the Army Commendation Medal and the Army Good Conduct Medal. Although his records from his first enlistment are not available, it appears it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) based on completion of a qualifying period of active Army service and correcting his DD Form 214, ending on 16 May 1991, to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017290

    Original file (20070017290.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show the awards of the Kuwait Liberation Medal and the Army Reserve Component Achievement Medal. The applicant's personnel record does not contain any orders awarding him the Army Reserve Component Achievement Medal for the period of his active duty tour ending 29 July 1991. Therefore, he is not entitled to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101823C070208

    Original file (2004101823C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his Certificate of Release or Discharge (DD Form 214) be amended by deleting the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and including the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the Meritorious Service Medal, the Kuwait Liberation Medal-K and the Kuwait Liberation Medal-SA. The applicant provides in support of his application a memorandum for record dated 23 April 1991, indicating that the applicant was assigned to the 377th Transportation Company in support of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050012261

    Original file (20050012261.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    During its original review of the applicant's case, the Board found that the evidence of record showed the applicant served in the Pennsylvania Army National Guard (PAARNG), and was trained in, awarded and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 88M (Motor Transport Operator), and that he served with the 253rd Transportation Company during his assignment in Southwest Asia (SWA). However, by regulation, assignment to a qualifying infantry unit alone is not sufficient to support award...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050001226

    Original file (20050001226.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    During its original review of the applicant's case, the Board found that the evidence of record showed the applicant served in the Pennsylvania Army National Guard (PAARNG), and was trained in, awarded and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 88M (Motor Transport Operator), and that he served with the 253rd Transportation Company during his assignment in Southwest Asia (SWA). However, by regulation, assignment to a qualifying infantry unit alone is not sufficient to support award...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025250

    Original file (20110025250.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 August 1991 to show his combat service and a combat specialty. His DD Form 214 for this period of service shows in: * Item 11 (Primary Specialty (List number, title, and years and months in specialty. His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows in: * Item 5 (Overseas Service) he served in Saudi Arabia from 4 November 1990 to 22 July 1991 * Item 17...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008188

    Original file (20100008188.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It further provides that item 18 will contain the following entry for Regular Army Soldiers deployed with their unit during their continuous period of active service: "SERVICE IN (NAME OF COUNTRY DEPLOYED) FROM (inclusive dates for example, YYYYMMDD-YYYYMMDD)." The evidence of record shows the applicant was deployed to Saudi Arabia from 1 October 1990 to 15 April 1991, a period of 6 months and 15 days. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show these awards.