Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001418
Original file (20090001418.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 April 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090001418 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that her name shown in her records be changed from D______ L______ to D______ G____. 

2.  The applicant states that she was married on 5 November 1987; however, she only recently took her spouse's name after being married for over 21 years. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her marriage license, driver's license, military identification card and Social Security Card.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 July 1981 and remained on active duty as a finance specialist through a series of continuous reenlistments.  She was married on 5 November 1987 to another service member at the time and on 1 November 1997, she was promoted to the pay grade of E-7.

3.  She continued to serve in the name of D______ L______ until she was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 31 August 2001 and was transferred to the Retired List effective 1 September 2001, due to sufficient service for retirement.  She had served 20 years, 1 month and 24 days of total active service.  The DD Form 214 that she was issued at the time of REFRAD shows that she was retired in the name of D______ L_______.

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) provides, in pertinent part, guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  This regulation has historically stated that item 1 (Last Name, First Name, Middle Name) of the DD Form 214 will contain the name taken from the Soldier’s personnel record that are in effect on the date of separation.  That regulation also states that changes that occur subsequent to the date of separation are not authorized for entry and will not be entered on the DD Form 214 retroactively.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  It is understandable that the applicant desires to have the name recorded in her military records changed to her current legal name.  However, there is no evidence of record or independent evidence that suggests the name recorded in her military records exhibits a material error or injustice.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted under, served in, and was REFRAD under the name of "D______ L_______" and it was not until after she was REFRAD that she changed her name.  

3.  Accordingly, her DD Form 214 correctly reflects her legal name as it existed on the date she was REFRAD and there is no basis to change her DD Form 214 or other records to reflect otherwise.

4.  There is no evidence that suggests the applicant has or would suffer any injury or injustice as a result of the Army maintaining its records with the name under which she served.  The Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  While it is understandable the applicant desires to now record her current name in her military records, there is not a sufficiently compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army’s records at this late date.  
5.  The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document along with her application and the supporting evidence she provided, which confirms her current name, will be filed in her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion in regard to the difference in the name recorded in her military records and to satisfy her desire to have her current name documented in her OMPF.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x____  _____x___  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001418



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090001418



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008621

    Original file (20100008621.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board. The applicant’s court document shows his name was changed from L______ Perez to M_____ R____ Perez on 24 June 1952, subsequent to his separation date.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002830

    Original file (20150002830.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that she be issued a new DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) based on the information that is contained on her DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), that her last name be changed to her maiden name, and a personal appearance hearing. The applicant states, in effect that: * she was issued a DD Form 215 to correct errors on her DD Form 214; however, it was not incorporated into her original DD Form 214 (which corrected her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005325C070205

    Original file (20060005325C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. Although the applicant’s last name was changed due to marriage, evidence of record shows the same first and middle names and gender were used at the time of the applicant's enlistment in 1989 and his release from active duty in 1990. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to changing the applicant's gender on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016523

    Original file (20140016523.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The restricted portion of the applicant's OMPF contains a DA Form 2627 showing that, on 16 July 2013, her battalion commander informed her she was considering whether she should be punished under Article 15, UCMJ, for: * on or about 28 June 2013, being disrespectful in language toward 1SG L_______ by saying to him "I will not be coming in to sign the hand receipt" or words to that effect * on or about 28 June 2013, willfully disobeying a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001405

    Original file (20150001405.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * her last name as Shields vice Taylor * her foreign service in Bahrain from May to June 1999 2. Block 1 (Name) of her DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States), dated 17 February 1982, shows her last name as Shields. With respect to showing her foreign service in Bahrain, notwithstanding her sincerity, although she provided...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019025

    Original file (20110019025.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 April 2010 to show her last name as "Stephens" instead of "Everette." The fact that she married and changed her name after her retirement does not serve as a basis to alter her records to reflect information that was not in effect at the time of her retirement. _______ _ X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015793

    Original file (20130015793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    f. When asked if any civilian employees who work for the clinic informed him the applicant smoked spice he stated Kim, the receptionist, told him someone told her the applicant smoked spice or used other drugs. She also stated the applicant called her at home after hours and told her not to tell about the other employee moving in with her. She told him that the applicant volunteered to take a urinalysis and she told her she didn't have to at the time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003431C071113

    Original file (20070003431C071113.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this regard, the evidence of record shows that the applicant’s military service records reflect the correct name and sex under which military service was performed. While the Board understands the applicant's desire to have the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021753

    Original file (20130021753 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect her new name and Social Security Number (SSN). Her DD Form 214 issued at the time of her REFRAD reflects the name and SSN under which she was serving at the time of her REFRAD. The evidence of record shows the name and SSN depicted on the applicant’s DD Form 214 is the SSN that she enlisted and served under during all of her service and the last name she served under.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018775

    Original file (20120018775.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). She was transferred to a USAR Troop Program Unit in Kansas and the DD Form 214 she was issued at the time of REFRAD reflects the last name she was serving under at the time (Cashxxx). Therefore, since the applicable regulation requires that the DD Form 214 be prepared to reflect information as it exists in the official records at the time of separation and the applicant’s DD Form 214 was prepared...