Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018775
Original file (20120018775.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	

		BOARD DATE:	  2 May 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120018775 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show her last name as “Flemxxx.”

2.  The applicant states that she joined the National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) after she was released from active duty (REFRAD) and all of her Reserve Component documents reflect her last name as “Flemxxx.”  She would like her DD Form 214 corrected to show the same last name because it causes confusion when she submits her separation documents to employers.

3.  The applicant provides copies of her DD Form 214, National Guard Bureau Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), a letter from the Department of Veterans Affairs, and discharge orders from the Missouri Army National Guard (MOARNG) and USAR. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 September 1987 for a period of 3 years under the last name of Chambxxx.  She completed one-station unit training at Fort McClellan, Alabama and she was transferred to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri for her first assignment.  She married on 2 September 1989 and changed her last name to Cashxxx.

3.  She served a 1-year tour in Korea and was assigned to Fort Riley, Kansas where she remained until she was honorably REFRAD.  She was transferred to a USAR Troop Program Unit in Kansas and the DD Form 214 she was issued at the time of REFRAD reflects the last name she was serving under at the time (Cashxxx).

4.  On 1 June 1994, she was transferred to a unit of the MOARNG and on 
1 September 1994 her last name was changed to “Flemxxx” due to marrying another service member.

5.  On 1 May 1995, she was discharged from the MOARNG under her new last name (Flemxxx) and she was transferred to the USAR where she served until she was honorably discharged from the USAR on 30 January 1996.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority for preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides that the DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect information as it exists in the official records at the time of separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that her DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect the last name she served under when she was discharged from the Reserve Components has been noted.

2.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 correctly reflects the last name she was serving under at the time she was REFRAD in accordance with the applicable regulations. 

3.  Therefore, since the applicable regulation requires that the DD Form 214 be prepared to reflect information as it exists in the official records at the time of separation and the applicant’s DD Form 214 was prepared accordingly, there appears to be no basis to grant her request.

4.  This Record of Proceedings will be filed in her military record in order to provide clarity and to deal with any confusion that might arise regarding the difference in her name.  Filing the Board’s decisional document will also guarantee the historical accuracy of the applicant's military record regarding the name under which she served.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _X   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120018775



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120018775



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020390

    Original file (20140020390.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends item 24 of her 21 August 2006 DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the characterization of her service was honorable. The evidence of record shows that only the honorable characterization may be awarded a Soldier upon completion of his/her period for which called or ordered to ADT. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. voiding the 21 August 2006 DD Form 214 that is under review in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008185

    Original file (20110008185.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show his correct Social Security Number (SSN) and date of birth (DOB). He used his father’s SSN and a DOB that was not his to enlist in the military. _______ _x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001418

    Original file (20090001418.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is no evidence of record or independent evidence that suggests the name recorded in her military records exhibits a material error or injustice. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted under, served in, and was REFRAD under the name of "D______ L_______" and it was not until after she was REFRAD that she changed her name. Accordingly, her DD Form 214 correctly reflects her legal name as it existed on the date she was REFRAD and there is no basis to change her DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022798

    Original file (20110022798.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. he completed 3 years active duty service encompassing a 15-month deployment to Iraq, followed by a 3-year reenlistment in the Army National Guard which included a 2-year MSO reduction; b. he served a total of 6 instead of 8 years active military service without performing any service in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR); c. although his career counselor had him sign the DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Contract) showing his 4 year, 9 month, and 27 day service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140010022

    Original file (AR20140010022.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that his last name was legally changed and he desires his DD Form 214 to be corrected to show that change. His records from that date were changed to reflect his new last name. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019025

    Original file (20110019025.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 April 2010 to show her last name as "Stephens" instead of "Everette." The fact that she married and changed her name after her retirement does not serve as a basis to alter her records to reflect information that was not in effect at the time of her retirement. _______ _ X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029431

    Original file (20100029431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She states she served 11 months and 8 days of active duty and then reenlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 19 December 1985 for six years. Her separation packet is not available for the Board’s review; however, her DD Form 214 shows she was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 12 December 1979, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel), chapter 8, for pregnancy. Orders D-12-135821, dated 18 December 1991, which are contained in her military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008296

    Original file (20100008296.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The enlistment documents on file report the applicant's first name was "John" and the applicant's gender was male. All documents and orders on file in the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) that contain a name and/or gender show the first name "John" and gender as male. The applicant contends that her military record should be corrected to show her correct first and middle names and gender.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021308

    Original file (20120021308.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 25 June 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120021308 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her last name as "Cxxxxy" instead of "Jxxxs." A DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 23 February 1990, shows the applicant's last name was changed in her service records to "Jxxxs."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025925

    Original file (20100025925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her military records to show her married name. The evidence of record shows the applicant's military service records reflect her maiden name and the approved official name changes that she requested throughout her military service. Records also show that, from that point on, her last name (i.e., "J-----n") is consistently recorded in her official military service records, including her DD Form 214, when she retired from active duty on 30 September 2009.