Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008621
Original file (20100008621.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 August 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100008621 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his name be changed from L______ Perez to M_____ R____ Perez.  

2.  The applicant states his name is actually M______ R____ Perez.  His name was changed by a court order, dated 24 June 1952 in San Juan, Puerto Rico.  

3.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application:

* WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge)
* Court document (Resolution from the Judicial District Court of San Juan, Puerto Rico) in Spanish
* Court document (Resolution from the Judicial District Court of San Juan, Puerto Rico) translated into English 
* Honorable Discharge Certificate
* Final Payment – Worksheet

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board.  This case is being considered using the documents provided by the applicant.  

3.  The applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 10 November 1944 and he was discharged on 6 April 1946.  

4.  His WD AGO Form 53-55 and Honorable Discharge Certificate show his first and last name as L______ Perez.  

5.  His Final Payment Worksheet also shows his first and last name as L______ Perez.  

6.  The applicant provided a resolution, dated 24 June 1952, from the Judicial District Court of San Juan Puerto Rico.  This document indicates the following:

* Midwife inscribed the applicant with the name of L_______ at the time of his birth
* He has always been recognized as M____ by family members and neighbors
* He signed up for Elective Service and he did so with the name that appeared on his birth certificate
* His name was changed from L______ R____ Perez to M_____ R____ Perez 

7.  Army Regulation 600-2 (Name and Birth Data, Social Security Account Number, and Temporary Identification Number) prescribed the procedures for the recording of names and the changing of record of name and/or birth data.  Paragraph 2-3 stated that the request for change of the record must originate with the individual.  The authority to approve the change of record was delegated to the immediate commanding officer or other official so designated by him.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the integrity of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should actually reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, this Board is reluctant to recommend that those records be changed.

2.  The applicant’s court document shows his name was changed from L______ Perez to M_____ R____ Perez on 24 June 1952, subsequent to his separation date.  

3.  Although the applicant appears to be currently using the name shown on his court order, M_____ R____ Perez, he used the name L______ Perez while on active duty.  While the applicant's desire to have the records changed is understood, there is no basis for compromising the integrity of the Army's records.  This Board action will be filed in his military records; therefore, the name he is currently using will be on hand.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100008621



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100008621



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013232

    Original file (20090013232.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. These documents include his WD AGO Form 100 (Separation Qualification Record), dated 9 March 1946; his WD Form 372A (Final Payment), dated 31 January 1946; his WD AGO Form 38 (Report of Physical Examination of Enlisted Personnel Prior to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007220C070206

    Original file (20050007220C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation) to show a different last name, date of birth, and place of birth. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075955C070403

    Original file (2002075955C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show the correct spelling of his last name and to show his correct date of birth. The Board considered the applicant's request to correct the spelling of his last name from G------s to G------z. Therefore, the Board determined that the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 should be corrected to show his birth date as 20 November 1923.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010362

    Original file (20080010362.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his date of birth (DOB) on his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Records and Report of Separation) from 21 February 1921 to 23 May 1922. Item 10 (Date of Birth) of his WD AGO Form 53-55 shows his DOB as 21 February 1921. The evidence of record shows that the applicant used 21 February 1921 as his DOB throughout his military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012698

    Original file (20100012698.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. Considering all the evidence and information presented by the applicant together with the available evidence of record, applicable law, and regulations, it is concluded that the documents provided by the applicant are insufficient evidence to warrant a change to his military service records and separation document. In this regard, the evidence of record indicates the applicant's military service records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016066

    Original file (20110016066.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) to show his date of birth (DOB) as 15 March 1921 instead of 15 March 1919. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant contends his WD AGO Form 53...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001120

    Original file (20120001120.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her father's records to show his name as Del Valle-Lebron, F____ instead of Lebron, F____ D. 2. The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. _______ _ X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060062C070421

    Original file (2001060062C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his Report of Separation, WD AGO Form 53-55, item 40 be corrected to show his separation year as 1945 and that the American Campaign Medal, the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal with three bronze service stars, and the World War II Victory Medal be added to item 33. The available evidence of record shows that the applicant did not meet the eligibility criteria for award of the American Campaign Medal. That the applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55, item 32 be amended to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022535

    Original file (20110022535.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he was commissioned through the State Officer Candidate School (OCS) on 25 August 2009 * his NGB Form 0122E (Special Orders Number 255 AR), dated 19 October 2011, shows his initial appointment effective date as 4 March 2011 * his Federal Recognition packet was never submitted to the National Guard Bureau (NGB); therefore he was not given his Federal Recognition * 16 months after asking about his promotion to first lieutenant (1LT), he discovered he had never received...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017919

    Original file (20130017919.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: The applicant's request, statement, and supporting documents are provided by his counsel. The applicant's counsel argues that at the time the applicant completed the DDESS enrollment form on 30 April 2007 his assignment in Puerto Rico was scheduled to terminate on 25 July 2008 and the applicant had not been informed that his request for extension had been denied; therefore, the applicant did not make a false official statement. In regard to...