Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018709
Original file (20080018709.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        19 FEBRUARY 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080018709 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect that he was promoted to the rank of "Motor Sergeant."

2.  The applicant states that before and after graduating from motor sergeant's school in Germany, he was told that he would attain the rank of motor sergeant.  However, he was never promoted to the rank of motor sergeant and when he inquired about it, he was told that it would be taken care of.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his Separation Qualification Record (DA Form 493), a copy of his report of separation (DD Form 214), a copy of his Honorable Discharge Certificate, and a copy of his diploma from the Motor Sergeant's Course.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant was born on 19 October 1929 and was inducted in the Army of the United States in New York City, New York on 18 January 1951.  He completed his training and was transferred to Germany.

4.  The available records show that he served as a driver for 10 months, he was advanced to the temporary rank of private first class (PFC) on 11 December 1951, and he was assigned to Headquarters Company, 2nd Battalion, 169th Infantry Regiment.  He was appointed to the rank of acting corporal on 26 April 1952.  

5.  He completed the Motor Sergeant's Course for military occupational specialty (MOS) 1014 on 20 June 1952 and was assigned as the battalion motor sergeant for 6 months.

6.  On 24 December 1952, he was honorably released from active duty at Camp Kilmer, New Jersey in the rank of PFC.  He had served 1 year, 11 months, and 6 days of total active service and was transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) to fulfill his statutory service obligation.  He was honorably discharged from the USAR in the rank of PFC on 8 January 1957.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the sincerity of the applicant's claim that he was told that he would be promoted to the rank of motor sergeant is not in doubt, in actuality, motor sergeant was not a rank; it was an MOS title and a duty position.  

2.  The applicant's highest paying rank was that of a PFC and he actually served as an acting corporal.  Accordingly, he had to attain, or be promoted to the rank of corporal before he could be promoted to the rank of sergeant. 

3.  Although his available records reflect that he performed the duties of a battalion motor sergeant, that in itself did not automatically confer a promotion to the rank of sergeant or higher, nor did it negate the regulatory requirements to be promoted in sequence to the next higher grade.

4.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to show that he was properly recommended for promotion and that his promotion was not processed to completion or that a promotion order was published and he was not promoted, there appears to be no basis to grant his request.

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ________XXX______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018709



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080018709



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003551

    Original file (20090003551.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade held at the time of separation. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his grade as that of S/Sgt.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023587

    Original file (20110023587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) as follows: * Item 3 (Grade - Rate - Rank and Date of Appointment) to show he was appointed as a corporal (CPL) on 12 October 1952 instead of 1953 * Item 8 (Reason and Authority for Separation) to, in effect, list the correct date * Item 38 (Remarks) to show his permanent grade as private first class (PFC) instead of private (PV2) 2. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018867

    Original file (20080018867.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be corrected to show he was released from active duty (REFRAD) in the rank of corporal (CPL). While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005359

    Original file (20120005359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show his rank/grade as that of at least corporal (CPL)/E-4. The applicant's military record is not available to the Board for review.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001722

    Original file (20130001722.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he was a SGT at the time of his discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve; however, his discharge certificate shows he was a CPL. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) * a certificate of promotion, dated 6 June 1955 * DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate), dated 20 March 1956 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014918

    Original file (20130014918.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 3 (Grade, Rate, Rank, and Date of Appointment) of the DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) of her late husband, a former service (FSM), to show his rank as staff sergeant (SSG), pay grade E-6, with entitlement to back pay. The applicant provided copies of the following: * marriage license which shows she and the FSM were married on 11 June 1952 * two photographs alleged to be of herself and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002958

    Original file (20150002958.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: * reconsideration of his previous request for the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal * as a new issue, award of the Army of Occupation Medal 2. This document shows the 108th FAB received occupation credit for the period 2 May - 5 July 1945 for service in Germany. Army Regulation 600-65 (Service Medals), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000790

    Original file (20110000790.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be corrected to show that he was discharged in the rank of sergeant (SGT). While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012396

    Original file (20120012396.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Letter, National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 17 May 2012 * Standard Form (SF) 180 (Request Pertaining to Military Records), dated 30 April 2012 * DD Form 214 * Self-authored statement * Certificate of Completion, NCO Academy, dated 10 October 1952 * Certification of Military Service CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Unfortunately, his records do not contain a promotion recommendation or promotion orders for SGT. _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007269

    Original file (20090007269.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be issued a new DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) that contains all of his authorized awards. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that the Republic of Korea War Service Medal (ROKWSM) is awarded to members of the U.S. Armed Forces who served in Korea and adjacent waters between 25 June 1950 and 27 July 1953.