Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002958
Original file (20150002958.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	 22 September 2015 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150002958 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests: 

* reconsideration of his previous request for the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal
* as a new issue, award of the Army of Occupation Medal

2.  The applicant states he arrived in Germany in June 1952 and was assigned to the 108th Field Artillery Battalion (FAB), 28th Infantry Division.  He was in Germany from June 1952 to October 1953.  He was promoted to corporal in January 1953 and he was in charge of the field wire section.  He was told he could not be promoted to sergeant because all ranks were frozen.  He was proud of his men doing a good job, knowing he had trained them well.  He was also proud of what he did as a corporal.  For this reason, he believes he is entitled to the Army Good Conduct Medal.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) with an effective date of separation of 5 November 1953
* DD Form 215 (Correction to a DD Form 214)
* a Certificate of Gift Agreement from the Pennsylvania National Guard Military Museum
* a thank you note from the Commanding General, 28th Infantry Division
* a letter, dated 20 January 2015, from the Army Review Boards Agency 


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20140007179, on 4 December 2014.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available to the ABCMR for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, MO in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  This case is being considered based on the documents provided by the applicant.

3.  His DD Form 214 shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 26 November 1951.

4.  On 5 November 1953, he was honorably released from active duty.  He completed 1 year, 11 months, and 10 days of net active service this period.  He also completed 1 year, 5 months, and 10 days of foreign service.  His most significant duty assignment was B Battery, 108th FAB.  His DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal or the Army of Occupation Medal.

5.  Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, unit citation emblems, and occupation duty credit.  This document shows the 108th FAB received occupation credit for the period 2 May - 5 July 1945 for service in Germany.

6.  Army Regulation 600-65 (Service Medals), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940.  For the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  A Soldier's conduct and efficiency ratings, including those pertinent to attendance at service schools, must have all been recorded as “excellent” or higher, except that ratings of “Unknown” for portions of the period under consideration, and service school efficiency (emphasis in the original) ratings of less than “excellent” entered prior to 3 March 1946, would not be disqualifying.  There must have been no convictions by court-martial.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Due to the unavailability of the applicant's military records, there is insufficient evidence to verify his eligibility for the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  His DD Form 214 shows his most significant duty assignment as B Battery, 108th FAB.  DA Pamphlet 672-1 does not show the 108th FAB received occupation credit during the period he was assigned.  There is insufficient evidence to authorize him the Army of Occupation Medal.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  Regarding his request for reconsideration, the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20140007179, dated 4 December 2014, denying the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  Regarding his new request, the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned to authorize the award of the Army of Occupation Medal.



      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150002958



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150002958



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007387

    Original file (20120007387.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 17 August 1950 through 16 August 1953 * adding to his DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019524

    Original file (20090019524.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the son of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, correction of his father's DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer of Discharge) for the period ending 31 October 1961 to show the Army Good Conduct Medal, Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp, European-African-Middle-Eastern Campaign Medal with three bronze service stars, Korean Service Medal with three bronze service stars, Republic of Korea War Service Medal, Armed Forces Reserve Medal with one silver...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010605

    Original file (20120010605.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military service records to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. Army Regulation 600-65, in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010697

    Original file (20110010697.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the National Defense Service Medal from 25 September 1951 through 16 September 1963. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020416

    Original file (20090020416.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a. reconsideration of his previous application for correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), and b. correction of his record to show award of the Distinguished Unit Citation [now known as the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC)]. In the absence of evidence showing he was assigned to HHB, 2d Infantry Division Artillery during the period for which the unit was awarded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067446C070402

    Original file (2002067446C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 28 (Most Significant Duty Assignment) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be corrected to show award of a Letter of Commendation. Item 27 of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal and the Army of Occupation Medal (Germany). That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing to the individual concerned a DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011170

    Original file (20100011170.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows: * he held MOS (military occupational specialty) 1745 (infantryman) * he served 11 months and 23 days of foreign service * his most significant unit assignment was 32nd Infantry Regiment, 7th Infantry Division, Korea * he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, Korean Service Medal with 1 bronze service star, and the United Nations Service Medal * item 29 (Wounds) contains the entry "NONE" * he was honorably separated as a corporal on 11 March 1953 * he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010024

    Original file (20120010024.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), an unspecified sharpshooter marksmanship qualification badge, "Overseas Occupation Medal" (presumably he means the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp for the Army of Occupation of Italy) and "Colonel's Orderly Medal." Since Army Regulation 600-8-22 does not show the "Colonel's Orderly Medal" as an authorized award, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018109

    Original file (20100018109.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he was discharged in pay grade E-6; he was awarded the Korean Service Medal (KSM) with three bronze service stars, the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), the American Defense Service Medal (ADSM), the Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation (ROKPUC), the Army of Occupation Medal (AOM); and that he be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022501

    Original file (20100022501.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the: * Korean Service Medal with one bronze service star * National Defense Service Medal * Army of Occupation Medal with Japan Clasp * United Nations Service Medal * one overseas service bar 6. While the applicant’s DD Form 214 does not provide the specific dates the applicant served in Korea, it does confirm he completed 3 years, 5 months, and 28 days of...